Literature DB >> 20048183

Randomized study of intensified anthracycline doses for induction and recombinant interleukin-2 for maintenance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia age 50 to 70 years: results of the ALFA-9801 study.

Cecile Pautas1, Fatiha Merabet, Xavier Thomas, Emmanuel Raffoux, Claude Gardin, Selim Corm, Jean-Henri Bourhis, Oumedaly Reman, Pascal Turlure, Nathalie Contentin, Thierry de Revel, Philippe Rousselot, Claude Preudhomme, Dominique Bordessoule, Pierre Fenaux, Christine Terré, Mauricette Michallet, Hervé Dombret, Sylvie Chevret, Sylvie Castaigne.   

Abstract

PURPOSE In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), induction chemotherapy is based on standard doses of anthracyclines and cytarabine. High doses of cytarabine have been reported as being too toxic for patients older than age 50 years, but few studies have evaluated intensified doses of anthracyclines. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized Acute Leukemia French Association 9801 (ALFA-9801) study, high doses of daunorubicin (DNR; 80 mg/m(2)/d x 3 days) or idarubicin (IDA4; 12 mg/m(2)/d x 4 days) were compared with standard doses of idarubicin (IDA3; 12 mg/m(2)/d x 3 days) for remission induction in patients age 50 to 70 years, with an event-free survival (EFS) end point. After two consolidation courses based on intermediate doses of cytarabine, patients in continuous remission were randomly assigned to receive or not receive maintenance therapy with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2; 5 x 10(6) U/m(2) x 5 days each month) for a total duration of 12 months. A total of 468 patients entered the study (median age, 60 years). Results Overall complete remission rate was 77% with significant differences among the three randomization arms (83%, 78%, and 70% in the IDA3, IDA4, and DNR arms, respectively; P = .04). However, no significant differences were observed in relapse incidence, EFS, or overall survival among the three arms. In the 161 patients randomly assigned for maintenance therapy, no difference in outcome was observed between the rIL-2 and the no further treatment arms. CONCLUSION Neither intensification of anthracycline doses nor maintenance with rIL-2 showed a significant impact on AML course, at least as scheduled in this trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20048183     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  68 in total

1.  [Current treatment options in acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  M Heuser; R F Schlenk; A Ganser
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating IL-2 monotherapy as remission maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Pierre Squifflet; Beverly J Lange; Todd A Alonzo; Richard A Larson; Jonathan E Kolitz; Stephen L George; Clara D Bloomfield; Sylvie Castaigne; Sylvie Chevret; Didier Blaise; Dominique Maraninchi; Kathryn J Lucchesi; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Equipotent doses of daunorubicin and idarubicin for AML: a meta-analysis of clinical trials versus in vitro estimation.

Authors:  Sunil Adige; Rena G Lapidus; Brandon A Carter-Cooper; Alison Duffy; Ciera Patzke; Jennie Y Law; Maria R Baer; Nicholas P Ambulos; Ying Zou; Søren M Bentzen; Ashkan Emadi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  What Is the Best Daunorubicin Dose and Schedule for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction?

Authors:  Priyanka Pophali; Mark Litzow
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-01

Review 5.  Upfront therapy of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jenna Vanliere Canzoniero; Bhavana Bhatnagar; Maria R Baer; Ivana Gojo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Progress in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Tapan M Kadia; Farhad Ravandi; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-09-19

7.  Impact of additional genetic alterations on the outcome of patients with NPM1-mutated cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Pierre Peterlin; Aline Renneville; Raouf Ben Abdelali; Olivier Nibourel; Xavier Thomas; Cécile Pautas; Stéphane de Botton; Emmanuel Raffoux; Jean-Michel Cayuela; Nicolas Boissel; Christine Terré; Karine Celli-Lebras; Sylvie Castaigne; Claude Preudhomme; Claude Gardin; Hervé Dombret
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  A phase 2 trial of azacitidine and gemtuzumab ozogamicin therapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Sucha Nand; Megan Othus; John E Godwin; Cheryl L Willman; Thomas H Norwood; Dianna S Howard; Steven E Coutre; Harry P Erba; Frederick R Appelbaum
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Elderly.

Authors:  Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 10.  Novel agents and regimens for acute myeloid leukemia: 2009 ASH annual meeting highlights.

Authors:  Xiongpeng Zhu; Yuehua Ma; Delong Liu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 17.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.