Literature DB >> 30968179

Equipotent doses of daunorubicin and idarubicin for AML: a meta-analysis of clinical trials versus in vitro estimation.

Sunil Adige1,2, Rena G Lapidus1,2, Brandon A Carter-Cooper1,2, Alison Duffy1,3, Ciera Patzke1,3, Jennie Y Law1,2, Maria R Baer1,2, Nicholas P Ambulos1, Ying Zou1,4, Søren M Bentzen1,5, Ashkan Emadi6,7,8.   

Abstract

In the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the "7 + 3"-based strategy, combining cytarabine 100-200 mg/m2 for 7 days with an anthracycline for 3 days, remains the standard of care for younger and medically fit patients. Daunorubicin (DNR) and idarubicin (IDA) are the two anthracyclines most commonly used. DNR and IDA are used interchangeably with different conversion factors, as there is no high-level evidence on the equipotency of these two agents for AML treatment. To determine the equipotent doses of DNR and IDA, we first systematically reviewed studies directly comparing the clinical outcomes of AML induction therapy utilizing DNR and IDA. We found 15 articles that met our inclusion criteria and compared time-to-event survival end points as well as complete remission rates post-induction. The DNR:IDA equipotency ratio was estimated at 5.90 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-20.7. To validate the estimate from our meta-analysis biologically, we conducted in vitro tests comparing anti-AML activity of DNR and IDA against six AML cell lines and two primary AML cells from patients with different cytogenetic and molecular characteristics. Based on these in vitro data, the equipotency dose ratio between DNR and IDA was 4.06 with 95% CI 3.64-4.49. Combining the estimates from the meta-analysis and the in vitro data using inverse-variance weighting, the current best estimate of the DNR:IDA equipotent ratio is 4.1 with 95% CI 3.9-4.3. This estimate, however, is largely driven by the in vitro chemo-sensitivity data. Given clinical studies demonstrating the safety of IDA at higher doses, our work implies that dose intensification of IDA could be investigated in future clinical trials in AML.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia (AML); Anthracycline; Chemotherapy equipotency; Daunorubicin; Idarubicin; Meta-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30968179      PMCID: PMC7334867          DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03825-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  39 in total

1.  Drug shortages delay cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Merrill Goozner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Comparative pharmacokinetic study of idarubicin and daunorubicin in leukemia patients.

Authors:  J Robert; F Rigal-Huguet; P Hurteloup
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.271

3.  Comparative cellular pharmacology of daunorubicin and idarubicin in human multidrug-resistant leukemia cells.

Authors:  E Berman; M McBride
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Randomized multicenter phase II study of flavopiridol (alvocidib), cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (FLAM) versus cytarabine/daunorubicin (7+3) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Joshua F Zeidner; Matthew C Foster; Amanda L Blackford; Mark R Litzow; Lawrence E Morris; Stephen A Strickland; Jeffrey E Lancet; Prithviraj Bose; M Yair Levy; Raoul Tibes; Ivana Gojo; Christopher D Gocke; Gary L Rosner; Richard F Little; John J Wright; L Austin Doyle; B Douglas Smith; Judith E Karp
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Randomized study of induction therapy comparing standard-dose idarubicin with high-dose daunorubicin in adult patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: the JALSG AML201 Study.

Authors:  Shigeki Ohtake; Shuichi Miyawaki; Hiroyuki Fujita; Hitoshi Kiyoi; Katsuji Shinagawa; Noriko Usui; Hirokazu Okumura; Koichi Miyamura; Chiaki Nakaseko; Yasushi Miyazaki; Atsushi Fujieda; Tadashi Nagai; Takahisa Yamane; Masafumi Taniwaki; Masatomo Takahashi; Fumiharu Yagasaki; Yukihiko Kimura; Norio Asou; Hisashi Sakamaki; Hiroshi Handa; Sumihisa Honda; Kazunori Ohnishi; Tomoki Naoe; Ryuzo Ohno
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Phase II study of intravenous idarubicin in unfavorable non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  D C Case; M C Gerber; R A Gams; J Crawford; M L Votaw; C S Higano; B T Pruitt; J Gould
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  1993

7.  A systematic collaborative overview of randomized trials comparing idarubicin with daunorubicin (or other anthracyclines) as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. AML Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 8.  Anthracyclines during induction therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Teuffel; Kurt Leibundgut; Thomas Lehrnbecher; Todd A Alonzo; Joseph Beyene; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Efficacy and Toxicity of Idarubicin Versus High-dose Daunorubicin for Induction Chemotherapy in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weerapat Owattanapanich; Natthida Owattanapanich; Smith Kungwankiattichai; Patompong Ungprasert; Theera Ruchutrakool
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-08-22

Review 10.  Midostaurin, enasidenib, CPX-351, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and venetoclax bring new hope to AML.

Authors:  Andrew H Wei; Ing S Tiong
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 25.476

View more
  2 in total

1.  The efficacy and safety of daunorubicin versus idarubicin combined with cytarabine for induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Hanyu Wang; Xueting Xiao; Qirong Xiao; Yanhong Lu; Yong Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Drug responsiveness of leukemic cells detected in vitro at diagnosis correlates with therapy response and survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Maria A Kolesnikova; Aleksandra V Sen'kova; Tatiana I Pospelova; Marina A Zenkova
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-03-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.