Literature DB >> 20047637

The contractile deceleration point: an important physiologic landmark on oesophageal pressure topography.

J E Pandolfino1, E Leslie, D Luger, B Mitchell, M A Kwiatek, P J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to correlate oesophageal bolus transit with features of oesophageal pressure topography (OPT) plots and establish OPT metrics for accurately measuring peristaltic velocity.
METHODS: About 18 subjects underwent concurrent OPT and fluoroscopy studies. The deglutitive Contractile Front Velocity (CFV) in OPT plots was subdivided into an initial fast phase (CFV(fast)) and subsequent slow phase (CFV(slow)) separated by a user-defined deceleration point (CDP). Fluoroscopy studies were analyzed for the transition from the initial rapidly propagated luminal closure associated with peristalsis to slow bolus clearance characteristic of phrenic ampullary emptying and to identify the pressure sensors at the closure front and at the hiatus. Oesophageal pressure topography measures were correlated with fluoroscopic milestones of bolus transit. Oesophageal pressure topography studies from another 68 volunteers were utilized to develop normative ranges for CFV(fast) and CFV(slow). KEY
RESULTS: A distinct change in velocity could be determined in all 36 barium swallows with the fast and slow contractile segments having a median velocity of 4.2 cm s(-1) and 1.0 cm s(-1), respectively. The CDP noted on OPT correlated closely with formation of the phrenic ampulla making CFV(fast) (mean 5.1 cm s(-1)) correspond closely to peristaltic propagation and CFV(slow) (mean 1.7 cm s(-1)) to ampullary emptying. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The deceleration point in the CFV on OPT plots accurately demarcated the early region in which the CFV reflects peristaltic velocity (CFV(fast)) from the later region where it reflects the progression of ampullary emptying (CFV(slow)). These distinctions should help objectify definitions of disordered peristalsis, especially spasm, and improve understanding of impaired bolus transit across the oesophagogastric junction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20047637      PMCID: PMC2883458          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  14 in total

1.  High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry.

Authors:  M Fox; G Hebbard; P Janiak; J G Brasseur; S Ghosh; M Thumshirn; M Fried; W Schwizer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Nilesh Lodhia; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-10

4.  Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; W J Dodds; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  S J Spechler; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  The phrenic ampulla: distal esophagus or potential hiatal hernia?

Authors:  S Lin; J G Brasseur; P Pouderoux; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-02

7.  Intramural mechanism of esophageal peristalsis: roles of cholinergic and noncholinergic nerves.

Authors:  J Crist; J S Gidda; R K Goyal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effect of selective muscarinic antagonists on peristaltic contractions in opossum smooth muscle.

Authors:  R J Gilbert; W J Dodds
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-01

9.  Intrabolus pressure gradient identifies pathological constriction in the upper esophageal sphincter during flow.

Authors:  Anupam Pal; Rohan B Williams; Ian J Cook; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  37 in total

1.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT).

Authors:  Sabine Roman; John E Pandolfino; Joan Chen; Lubomyr Boris; Daniel Luger; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Pressure morphology of the relaxed lower esophageal sphincter: the formation and collapse of the phrenic ampulla.

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; Frédéric Nicodème; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Distal esophageal spasm.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Localizing the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in patients with abnormal esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  Z Lin; J E Pandolfino; Y Xiao; D Carlson; K Bidari; G Escobar; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users.

Authors:  Erick Raj Singh; Christopher Rife; Steven Clayton; Peter Naas; Paul Nietert; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.806

9.  Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia: more the rule than the exception.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas; François Mion; Thomas B Nealis; Nathaniel J Soper; Gilles Poncet; Frédéric Nicodème; Eric Hungness; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Esophageal contractions in type 3 achalasia esophagus: simultaneous or peristaltic?

Authors:  Tae Ho Kim; Nirali Patel; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.