Literature DB >> 20047626

Assessing the validity of the Omron HEM-907XL oscillometric blood pressure measurement device in a National Survey environment.

Yechiam Ostchega1, Tatiana Nwankwo, Paul D Sorlie, Michael Wolz, George Zipf.   

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) readings taken by Omron HEM-907XL were compared with the results obtained using sphygmomanometer (HgS) in 509 individuals using 2002 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) criteria. With the exception of diastolic BP in youth ages 13 to 19 years (mean difference, -1.77 mm Hg; standard deviation, 8.65), the Omron device met the criteria. Agreement for hypertension (BP >or=140/90 mm Hg) was above chance (kappa=0.68) and, compared with HgS, Omron underestimated the prevalence of hypertension by 2.65%. The Omron and HgS measurements were highly correlated (r=0.94 for systolic BP and r=0.83 for diastolic BP). Both increased systolic and diastolic BP decreased device agreement (beta-coefficient=-0.10872, P<.0001; beta-coefficient=-0.25981, P<.0001, respectively). The Omron device meets AAMI criteria with the exception of diastolic BP in youth ages 13 to 19 years. However, Omron underestimated the prevalence of hypertension and device agreement decreases with increased systolic and diastolic BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20047626      PMCID: PMC8673034          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00199.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  12 in total

1.  Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  E O'Brien; B Waeber; G Parati; J Staessen; M G Myers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

2.  Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults.

Authors:  W B White; Y A Anwar
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Natalie H McInnis; George J Fodor; Frans H H Leenen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Valory N. Pavlik; David J. Hyman; Christine Toronjo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  US demographic trends in mid-arm circumference and recommended blood pressure cuffs for children and adolescents: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-2004.

Authors:  Ronald J Prineas; Yechiam Ostchega; Margaret Carroll; Charles Dillon; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  US demographic trends in mid-arm circumference and recommended blood pressure cuffs: 1988-2002.

Authors:  Y Ostchega; C Dillon; M Carroll; R J Prineas; M McDowell
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.

Authors:  Hanyu Ni; Colin Wu; Ronald Prineas; Steven Shea; Kiang Liu; Richard Kronmal; Diane Bild
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Isabella Riva; Alessia Giglio; Gianluca Caldara; Antonella Groppelli; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.444

10.  National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000: effect of observer training and protocol standardization on reducing blood pressure measurement error.

Authors:  Yechiam Ostchega; Ronald J Prineas; Ryne Paulose-Ram; Carlene M Grim; Grace Willard; Doreen Collins
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  31 in total

1.  High prevalence, low awareness, treatment and control rates of hypertension in Guinea: results from a population-based STEPS survey.

Authors:  A Camara; N M Baldé; M Diakité; D Sylla; E H Baldé; A P Kengne; M D Baldé
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Type D personality is not associated with coronary heart disease risk in a North American sample of retirement-aged adults.

Authors:  Noel C Larson; Steven D Barger; Sumner J Sydeman
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-06

3.  e-Care for heart wellness: a feasibility trial to decrease blood pressure and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Sheryl Catz; Paul A Fishman; Jennifer B McClure; Robert J Reid
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Discordance in national estimates of hypertension among young adults.

Authors:  Quynh C Nguyen; Joyce W Tabor; Pamela P Entzel; Yan Lau; Chirayath Suchindran; Jon M Hussey; Carolyn T Halpern; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 6.  Orthostatic Circulatory Disorders: From Nosology to Nuts and Bolts.

Authors:  Michael Gutkin; Julian M Stewart
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Partnering with Churches to Conduct a Wide-Scale Health Screening of an Urban, Segregated Community.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lynch; Joselyn Williams; Elizabeth Avery; Melissa M Crane; Brittney Lange-Maia; Christy Tangney; LaDawne Jenkins; Sheila A Dugan; Erin E Emery-Tiburcio; Steve M Epting
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-02

8.  Comparison of blood pressure measurements obtained in the home setting: analysis of the Health Measures at Home Study.

Authors:  Tatiana Nwankwo; Renee Gindi; Te-Ching Chen; Adena Galinsky; Ivey Miller; Ana Terry
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.444

9.  Sodium intake in a cross-sectional, representative sample of New York City adults.

Authors:  Sonia Y Angell; Stella Yi; Donna Eisenhower; Bonnie D Kerker; Christine J Curtis; Katherine Bartley; Lynn D Silver; Thomas A Farley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Nativity, language spoken at home, length of time in the United States, and race/ethnicity: associations with self-reported hypertension.

Authors:  Stella Yi; Tali Elfassy; Leena Gupta; Christa Myers; Bonnie Kerker
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.