Literature DB >> 20047027

Morphological comparison between adolescent and adult lumbar pedicles using computerised tomography scanning.

Abdullah Mohammed Abdo Mughir1, Mohd Imran Yusof, Shafie Abdullah, Shahrulazua Ahmad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To study the morphological difference between the lumbar pedicle in adolescent and adult groups as only less information is known about their pedicle morphology, especially in Malaysian population.
METHODS: The pedicle parameters of the lumbar spine in adolescent and adult groups including transverse outer pedicle diameter, transverse inner pedicle diameters, medial wall cortical thickness, lateral wall cortical thickness, pedicle length, transverse pedicle angle and sagittal pedicle angle were measured using computerised tomography (CT) scanning. The measurements in both groups were compared and analysed using statistical method.
RESULTS: In adolescent group, the mean transverse outer diameter was 8.9 +/- 1.2 mm, transverse inner diameter was 6.3 +/- 1.2 mm, medial cortical thickness was 1.6 +/- 1.2 mm, lateral cortical thickness was 1.3 +/- 1.2 mm, pedicle length was 41.7 +/- 3.8 mm, transverse angle was 20.0 +/- 2.5 degrees and sagittal angle was 16.0 +/- 1.7 degrees . In adult group, the mean transverse outer diameter was 9.8 +/- 1.3 mm, transverse inner diameter was 7.0 +/- 1.2 mm, medial cortical thickness was 1.7 +/- 1.2 mm, lateral cortical thickness was 1.4 +/- 1.6 mm, pedicle length was 44.8 +/- 5.0 mm, transverse angle was 21.7 +/- 2.3 degrees and sagittal angle was 17.4 +/- 1.7 degrees . Comparing the mean of the two age groups, all the measurements were significantly smaller (p < 0.05) in the adolescent patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle morphology in adolescent and adult population is different in all parameters, especially in males. Understanding of specific pedicle morphology for each group is imperative for safety in spinal procedures using pedicle route.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20047027     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-009-0612-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  21 in total

1.  Pedicle morphology of the immature thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  M R Zindrick; G W Knight; M J Sartori; T J Carnevale; A G Patwardhan; M A Lorenz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation.

Authors:  Sajal R Mitra; Sandeep P Datir; Sanjay O Jadhav
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Measurements of the lumbar pedicles in the Eastern Anatolian population.

Authors:  H H Kadioglu; E Takci; A Levent; M Arik; I H Aydin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Computed tomographic morphometry of thoracic pedicles: safety margin of transpedicular screw fixation in malaysian malay population.

Authors:  Kai Ming Liau; Mohd Imran Yusof; Mohd Shafie Abdullah; Sarimah Abdullah; Abdul Halim Yusof
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Age-related variations in the horizontal and vertical diameters of the pedicles of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H S Amonoo-Kuofi
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population.

Authors:  S Hou; R Hu; Y Shi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar pedicle morphology in the immature spine: a three-dimensional study using spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Hakan Senaran; Muharrem Yazici; Musturay Karcaaltincaba; Ahmet Alanay; R Emre Acaroğlu; M Cemalettin Aksoy; Macit Ariyürek; Adil Surat
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic images.

Authors:  Bing Li; Baoguo Jiang; Zhongguo Fu; Diangying Zhang; Tianbing Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation.

Authors:  J M Olsewski; E H Simmons; F C Kallen; F C Mendel; C M Severin; D L Berens
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Morphometric analysis of the thoracic and lumbar spine in Japanese on the use of pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kenya Nojiri; Morio Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prospective comparative study between straight and curved probe for pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yogesh K Pithwa; Kumar Venkatesh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Three-dimensionally printed vertebrae with different bone densities for surgical training.

Authors:  Marco Burkhard; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Characterization of polyurethane-based synthetic vertebrae for spinal cement augmentation training.

Authors:  Marianne Hollensteiner; Melanie Botzenmayer; David Fürst; Martin Winkler; Peter Augat; Sabrina Sandriesser; Falk Schrödl; Benjamin Esterer; Stefan Gabauer; Klaus Püschel; Andreas Schrempf
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Optimal cut-off points of lumbar pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter to predict lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sang Joon An; Soo Il Choi; Keum Nae Kang; Syn-Hae Yoon; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Determination of anisotropic elastic parameters from morphological parameters of cancellous bone for osteoporotic lumbar spine.

Authors:  Christoph Oefner; Elena Riemer; Kerstin Funke; Michael Werner; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Stephan Schoenfelder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.602

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.