Literature DB >> 20046823

Easy Multiplicity Control in Equivalence Testing Using Two One-sided Tests.

Carolyn Lauzon1, Brian Caffo.   

Abstract

Equivalence testing is growing in use in scientific research outside of its traditional role in the drug approval process. Largely due to its ease of use and recommendation from the United States Food and Drug Administration guidance, the most common statistical method for testing equivalence is the two one-sided tests procedure (TOST). Like classical point-null hypothesis testing, TOST is subject to multiplicity concerns as more comparisons are made. In this manuscript, a condition that bounds the family-wise error rate using TOST is given. This condition then leads to a simple solution for controlling the family-wise error rate. Specifically, we demonstrate that if all pair-wise comparisons of k independent groups are being evaluated for equivalence, then simply scaling the nominal Type I error rate down by (k - 1) is sufficient to maintain the family-wise error rate at the desired value or less. The resulting rule is much less conservative than the equally simple Bonferroni correction. An example of equivalence testing in a non drug-development setting is given.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046823      PMCID: PMC2800314          DOI: 10.1198/tast.2009.0029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  11 in total

1.  Assessing equivalence: an alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage.

Authors:  Lawrence E Barker; Elizabeth T Luman; Mary M McCauley; Susan Y Chu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  W J Westlake
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

4.  Bayesian approach to bioequivalence assessment: an example.

Authors:  H Fluehler; A P Grieve; D Mandallaz; J Mau; H A Moser
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results.

Authors:  S N Goodman; J A Berlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  A new statistical procedure for testing equivalence in two-group comparative bioavailability trials.

Authors:  W W Hauck; S Anderson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-02

7.  On Bayesian methods for bioequivalence.

Authors:  M R Selwyn; N R Hall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A Bayesian approach to bioequivalence for the 2 x 2 changeover design.

Authors:  M R Selwyn; A P Dempster; N R Hall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Radiopaque alginate microcapsules for X-ray visualization and immunoprotection of cellular therapeutics.

Authors:  B P Barnett; D L Kraitchman; C Lauzon; C A Magee; P Walczak; W D Gilson; A Arepally; J W M Bulte
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Magnetic resonance-guided, real-time targeted delivery and imaging of magnetocapsules immunoprotecting pancreatic islet cells.

Authors:  Brad P Barnett; Aravind Arepally; Parag V Karmarkar; Di Qian; Wesley D Gilson; Piotr Walczak; Valerie Howland; Leo Lawler; Cal Lauzon; Matthias Stuber; Dara L Kraitchman; Jeff W M Bulte
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  10 in total

1.  Task-invariance and reliability of anticipatory postural adjustments in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jo Armour Smith; Niklas König Ignasiak; Jesse V Jacobs
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  A modified grapefruit juice eliminates two compound classes as major mediators of the grapefruit juice-fexofenadine interaction: an in vitro-in vivo "connect".

Authors:  Christina S Won; Tian Lan; Karen M Vandermolen; Paul A Dawson; Nicholas H Oberlies; Wilbur W Widmer; Yolanda V Scarlett; Mary F Paine
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs).

Authors:  Palash Ghosh; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Bonnie Spring; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-09-09

4.  Not Just a Sum? Identifying Different Types of Interplay between Constituents in Combined Interventions.

Authors:  Katrijn Van Deun; Lieven Thorrez; Robert A van den Berg; Age K Smilde; Iven Van Mechelen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias.

Authors:  Harlan Campbell; Paul Gustafson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Validation of an inertial measurement unit to determine countermovement jump height.

Authors:  Emil Toft Nielsen; Peter Bo Jørgensen; Inger Mechlenburg; Henrik Sørensen
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2018-10-08

7.  Pleione: A tool for statistical and multi-objective calibration of Rule-based models.

Authors:  Rodrigo Santibáñez; Daniel Garrido; Alberto J M Martin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ugga; Renato Cuocolo; Sirio Cocozza; Giuseppe Pontillo; Andrea Elefante; Mario Quarantelli; Caterina Vicidomini; Maria Francesca De Pandis; Giovanna De Michele; Alessandra D'Amico; Oreste de Divitiis; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Assessing the efficacy of tablet-based simulations for learning pseudo-surgical instrumentation.

Authors:  James H Kryklywy; Victoria A Roach; Rebecca M Todd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two-dimensional reward evaluation in mice.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; Marion Rivalan; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.084

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.