Benjamin T Saunders1, Terry E Robinson. 1. Department of Psychology, Biopsychology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In addicts drug cues attract attention, elicit approach, and motivate drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior, and addicts find it difficult to resist such cues. In preclinical studies we have found, however, that food cues acquire incentive motivational properties only in a subset of individuals. For example, a food cue becomes attractive, eliciting approach and engagement with it, and acts as an effective conditional reinforcer in some rats but not others. We asked, therefore, whether rats that have a propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue are the same ones that attribute incentive value to a drug (cocaine) cue. METHODS: We first used a Pavlovian conditioned approach procedure to determine which individual rats attributed incentive salience to a food cue. A second cue was then associated with the IV self-administration of cocaine. Later, the ability of the cocaine cue to maintain self-administration behavior and to reinstate self-administration after extinction was assessed. RESULTS: We report that in individuals that had a propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue, a cocaine cue spurred motivation to take drugs (its removal greatly diminished self-administration) and reinstated robust drug-seeking after extinction. However, in those individuals that failed to attribute incentive salience to a food cue, the cocaine cue was relatively devoid of incentive motivational properties. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it is possible to determine, before any drug experience, which individuals will most likely have difficulty resisting drug cues, a trait that might confer susceptibility to addiction. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: In addicts drug cues attract attention, elicit approach, and motivate drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior, and addicts find it difficult to resist such cues. In preclinical studies we have found, however, that food cues acquire incentive motivational properties only in a subset of individuals. For example, a food cue becomes attractive, eliciting approach and engagement with it, and acts as an effective conditional reinforcer in some rats but not others. We asked, therefore, whether rats that have a propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue are the same ones that attribute incentive value to a drug (cocaine) cue. METHODS: We first used a Pavlovian conditioned approach procedure to determine which individual rats attributed incentive salience to a food cue. A second cue was then associated with the IV self-administration of cocaine. Later, the ability of the cocaine cue to maintain self-administration behavior and to reinstate self-administration after extinction was assessed. RESULTS: We report that in individuals that had a propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue, a cocaine cue spurred motivation to take drugs (its removal greatly diminished self-administration) and reinstated robust drug-seeking after extinction. However, in those individuals that failed to attribute incentive salience to a food cue, the cocaine cue was relatively devoid of incentive motivational properties. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it is possible to determine, before any drug experience, which individuals will most likely have difficulty resisting drug cues, a trait that might confer susceptibility to addiction. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: A R Caggiula; E C Donny; A R White; N Chaudhri; S Booth; M A Gharib; A Hoffman; K A Perkins; A F Sved Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Shelly B Flagel; Terry E Robinson; Jeremy J Clark; Sarah M Clinton; Stanley J Watson; Phillip Seeman; Paul E M Phillips; Huda Akil Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Marci R Mitchell; Virginia G Weiss; B Sofia Beas; Drake Morgan; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Lakshmikripa Jagannathan; Elijah D Lowenstein; Terry E Robinson; Jill B Becker; Jonathan D Morrow Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Reagan R Wetherill; Kanchana Jagannathan; Falk W Lohoff; Ronald Ehrman; Charles P O'Brien; Anna Rose Childress; Teresa R Franklin Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 4.280