Literature DB >> 23061530

Neural correlates of attentional bias for smoking cues: modulation by variance in the dopamine transporter gene.

Reagan R Wetherill1, Kanchana Jagannathan, Falk W Lohoff, Ronald Ehrman, Charles P O'Brien, Anna Rose Childress, Teresa R Franklin.   

Abstract

Cigarette-dependent smokers automatically and involuntarily orient attention toward smoking cues (SCs). This attentional bias is clinically significant, as it may contribute to relapse. Thus, identifying neural and genetic correlates of attentional bias is critical for improving interventions. Our previous studies show that the dopamine transporter (DAT) SLC6A3 genotype exerts profound effects on limbic responses to SCs. One potential mechanism underlying these effects is greater attentional bias for SCs. Here, we explored associations between attentional bias for SCs and neural responses to SCs among 'sated' smokers genotyped for the SLC6A3 polymorphism. Pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion functional magnetic resonance imaging images were acquired during SC exposure in 35 smokers genotyped for the SLC6A3 variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism (n = 16, 9-repeats; n = 19, 10/10-repeats). Participants completed a visual dot-probe attentional bias task, which contained pictures of smoking and non-smoking pictures, to examine whether genetic variation in DAT influences attentional bias and to investigate relationships between attentional bias and neural responses to SCs. Although attentional bias to smoking pictures was not significantly different between 9-repeats and 10/10-repeats, 9-repeats showed a positive correlation between attentional bias and increased SC-induced brain activity in the amygdala, whereas 10/10-repeats showed an inverse correlation in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC). In group comparisons, 9-repeats exhibited positive correlations between attentional bias and SCs in the mOFC and amygdala, relative to 10/10-repeats. Findings suggest that genetic variation in the DAT gene influences brain responses associated with attentional bias; thus, providing additional support for a SC-vulnerable endophenotype. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction; attentional bias; dopamine transporter; neuroimaging; smoking cues

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23061530      PMCID: PMC4052978          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00507.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Biol        ISSN: 1355-6215            Impact factor:   4.280


  59 in total

1.  Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Terry E Robinson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Limbic activation to cigarette smoking cues independent of nicotine withdrawal: a perfusion fMRI study.

Authors:  Teresa R Franklin; Ze Wang; Jiongjiong Wang; Nathan Sciortino; Derek Harper; Yin Li; Ron Ehrman; Kyle Kampman; Charles P O'Brien; John A Detre; Anna Rose Childress
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 3.  Imaging stress- and cue-induced drug and alcohol craving: association with relapse and clinical implications.

Authors:  Rajita Sinha; C S R Li
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2007-01

4.  Empirical optimization of ASL data analysis using an ASL data processing toolbox: ASLtbx.

Authors:  Ze Wang; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Hengyi Rao; Jiongjiong Wang; María A Fernández-Seara; Anna R Childress; John A Detre
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  DRD4 VNTR polymorphism is associated with transient fMRI-BOLD responses to smoking cues.

Authors:  F Joseph McClernon; Kent E Hutchison; Jed E Rose; Rachel V Kozink
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 7.  Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences.

Authors:  Matt Field; W Miles Cox
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 8.  Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse.

Authors:  Arthur Tomie; Kathryn L Grimes; Larissa A Pohorecky
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-12-28

9.  Contributions of the amygdala to reward expectancy and choice signals in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Alan N Hampton; Ralph Adolphs; Michael J Tyszka; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Menstrual cycle phase at quit date predicts smoking status in an NRT treatment trial: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Teresa R Franklin; Ronald Ehrman; Kevin G Lynch; Derek Harper; Nathan Sciortino; Charles P O'Brien; Anna Rose Childress
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.681

View more
  16 in total

1.  Influence of menstrual cycle phase on neural and craving responses to appetitive smoking cues in naturally cycling females.

Authors:  Teresa R Franklin; Kanchana Jagannathan; Reagan R Wetherill; Barbara Johnson; Shannon Kelly; Jamison Langguth; Joel Mumma; Anna Rose Childress
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 2.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Classifying and characterizing nicotine use disorder with high accuracy using machine learning and resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Reagan R Wetherill; Hengyi Rao; Nathan Hager; Jieqiong Wang; Teresa R Franklin; Yong Fan
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  Multivariate pattern analysis of the neural correlates of smoking cue attentional bias.

Authors:  Amanda Elton; Vicki W Chanon; Charlotte A Boettiger
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 5.  Neuroimaging in psychiatric pharmacogenetics research: the promise and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mary Falcone; Ryan M Smith; Meghan J Chenoweth; Abesh Kumar Bhattacharjee; John R Kelsoe; Rachel F Tyndale; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Individual variation in incentive salience attribution and accumbens dopamine transporter expression and function.

Authors:  Bryan F Singer; Bipasha Guptaroy; Curtis J Austin; Isabella Wohl; Vedran Lovic; Jillian L Seiler; Roxanne A Vaughan; Margaret E Gnegy; Terry E Robinson; Brandon J Aragona
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Gene x abstinence effects on drug cue reactivity in addiction: multimodal evidence.

Authors:  Scott J Moeller; Muhammad A Parvaz; Elena Shumay; Nicasia Beebe-Wang; Anna B Konova; Nelly Alia-Klein; Nora D Volkow; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  GABA levels in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex associated with difficulty ignoring smoking-related cues in tobacco-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  Amy C Janes; John Eric Jensen; Stacey L Farmer; Blaise Deb Frederick; Diego A Pizzagalli; Scott E Lukas
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  The impact of sex on brain responses to smoking cues: a perfusion fMRI study.

Authors:  Reagan R Wetherill; Kimberly A Young; Kanchana Jagannathan; Joshua Shin; Charles P O'Brien; Anna Rose Childress; Teresa R Franklin
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Biases of attention in chronic smokers: men and women are not alike.

Authors:  Andrea Perlato; Elisa Santandrea; Chiara Della Libera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.