BACKGROUND: Intracellular Ca(2+) handling is abnormal in human heart failure. Studies have demonstrated that left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support reverses phenotypic alterations, suggesting that, in select patients, LVAD support may be a bridge to recovery. Few studies have related support duration to phenotypic recovery. We hypothesized that reversal of impaired sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) cycling following LVAD implantation is duration-dependent. METHODS: We used post-rest potentiation to assess SR function, and Western blot analysis to measure Ca(2+)-cycling proteins. Left ventricular tissue from 10 non-failing hearts, 8 failing hearts and 10 LVAD-supported hearts was analyzed. Support ranged from 7 to 334 days. The median duration, 115 days, divided patients into short- and long-term support groups. RESULTS: Post-rest potentiation (PRP) response recovered after short-term LVAD support to a level (116.8 +/- 12.1%; n = 5) close to non-failing (123.4 +/- 12.0%; n = 10) hearts, but recovery after long-term support (23.5 +/- 7.0%; n = 5) remained closer to that of failing hearts (13.5 +/- 5.6%). We found a similar pattern of normalization for SR Ca(2+)-ATPase protein and the phospholamban/SR Ca(2+)-ATPase ratio (non-failing: 0.66 +/- 0.11; failing: 1.21 +/- 0.23; short-duration LVAD: 0.68 +/- 0.14; long-duration LVAD: 1.67 +/- 0.30; correlation p < 0.001; r = 0.93). The ratio also tended to correlate with the PRP response after unloading (p = 0.05; r = -0.65). CONCLUSIONS: SR Ca(2+) handling improved during early LVAD support, but long-term support was associated with abnormal Ca(2+) cycling. These findings cast doubt on strategies designed to wean patients after complete unloading with an LVAD. Copyright (c) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Intracellular Ca(2+) handling is abnormal in humanheart failure. Studies have demonstrated that left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support reverses phenotypic alterations, suggesting that, in select patients, LVAD support may be a bridge to recovery. Few studies have related support duration to phenotypic recovery. We hypothesized that reversal of impaired sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) cycling following LVAD implantation is duration-dependent. METHODS: We used post-rest potentiation to assess SR function, and Western blot analysis to measure Ca(2+)-cycling proteins. Left ventricular tissue from 10 non-failing hearts, 8 failing hearts and 10 LVAD-supported hearts was analyzed. Support ranged from 7 to 334 days. The median duration, 115 days, divided patients into short- and long-term support groups. RESULTS: Post-rest potentiation (PRP) response recovered after short-term LVAD support to a level (116.8 +/- 12.1%; n = 5) close to non-failing (123.4 +/- 12.0%; n = 10) hearts, but recovery after long-term support (23.5 +/- 7.0%; n = 5) remained closer to that of failing hearts (13.5 +/- 5.6%). We found a similar pattern of normalization for SR Ca(2+)-ATPase protein and the phospholamban/SR Ca(2+)-ATPase ratio (non-failing: 0.66 +/- 0.11; failing: 1.21 +/- 0.23; short-duration LVAD: 0.68 +/- 0.14; long-duration LVAD: 1.67 +/- 0.30; correlation p < 0.001; r = 0.93). The ratio also tended to correlate with the PRP response after unloading (p = 0.05; r = -0.65). CONCLUSIONS: SR Ca(2+) handling improved during early LVAD support, but long-term support was associated with abnormal Ca(2+) cycling. These findings cast doubt on strategies designed to wean patients after complete unloading with an LVAD. Copyright (c) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kirk R Hutchinson; Anuradha Guggilam; Mary J Cismowski; Maarten L Galantowicz; Thomas A West; James A Stewart; Xiaojin Zhang; Kevin C Lord; Pamela A Lucchesi Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-09-01
Authors: Mosi K Bennett; Wendy E Sweet; Sara Baicker-McKee; Elizabeth Looney; Kristen Karohl; Maria Mountis; W H Wilson Tang; Randall C Starling; Christine S Moravec Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Jennifer L Hall; David R Fermin; Emma J Birks; Paul J R Barton; Mark Slaughter; Peter Eckman; Hideo A Baba; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Leslie W Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-02-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Jose Rivero; Patricia Campbell; Leslie Griffin; Colleen Smith; Courtney Foster; Brian Claggett; Robert J Glynn; Gregory Couper; Michael M Givertz; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Estibaliz Castillero; Ziad A Ali; Hirokazu Akashi; Nicholas Giangreco; Catherine Wang; Eric J Stöhr; Ruping Ji; Xiaokan Zhang; Nathaniel Kheysin; Joo-Eun S Park; Sheetal Hegde; Sanatkumar Patel; Samantha Stein; Carlos Cuenca; Diana Leung; Shunichi Homma; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Veli K Topkara; Koji Takeda; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; H Lee Sweeney; P Christian Schulze; Isaac George Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Michael Ibrahim; Abeer Al Masri; Manoraj Navaratnarajah; Urszula Siedlecka; Gopal K Soppa; Alexey Moshkov; Sara Abou Al-Saud; Julia Gorelik; Magdi H Yacoub; Cesare M N Terracciano Journal: FASEB J Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 5.191