Literature DB >> 20044278

Duration of left ventricular assist device support: Effects on abnormal calcium cycling and functional recovery in the failing human heart.

Monique L Ogletree1, Wendy E Sweet, Cassandra Talerico, Mary E Klecka, James B Young, Nicholas G Smedira, Randall C Starling, Christine S Moravec.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracellular Ca(2+) handling is abnormal in human heart failure. Studies have demonstrated that left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support reverses phenotypic alterations, suggesting that, in select patients, LVAD support may be a bridge to recovery. Few studies have related support duration to phenotypic recovery. We hypothesized that reversal of impaired sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) cycling following LVAD implantation is duration-dependent.
METHODS: We used post-rest potentiation to assess SR function, and Western blot analysis to measure Ca(2+)-cycling proteins. Left ventricular tissue from 10 non-failing hearts, 8 failing hearts and 10 LVAD-supported hearts was analyzed. Support ranged from 7 to 334 days. The median duration, 115 days, divided patients into short- and long-term support groups.
RESULTS: Post-rest potentiation (PRP) response recovered after short-term LVAD support to a level (116.8 +/- 12.1%; n = 5) close to non-failing (123.4 +/- 12.0%; n = 10) hearts, but recovery after long-term support (23.5 +/- 7.0%; n = 5) remained closer to that of failing hearts (13.5 +/- 5.6%). We found a similar pattern of normalization for SR Ca(2+)-ATPase protein and the phospholamban/SR Ca(2+)-ATPase ratio (non-failing: 0.66 +/- 0.11; failing: 1.21 +/- 0.23; short-duration LVAD: 0.68 +/- 0.14; long-duration LVAD: 1.67 +/- 0.30; correlation p < 0.001; r = 0.93). The ratio also tended to correlate with the PRP response after unloading (p = 0.05; r = -0.65).
CONCLUSIONS: SR Ca(2+) handling improved during early LVAD support, but long-term support was associated with abnormal Ca(2+) cycling. These findings cast doubt on strategies designed to wean patients after complete unloading with an LVAD. Copyright (c) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20044278     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  19 in total

1.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Imaging in patients after cardiac transplantation and in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Bhanu Gupta; Dany Jacob; Randall Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Temporal pattern of left ventricular structural and functional remodeling following reversal of volume overload heart failure.

Authors:  Kirk R Hutchinson; Anuradha Guggilam; Mary J Cismowski; Maarten L Galantowicz; Thomas A West; James A Stewart; Xiaojin Zhang; Kevin C Lord; Pamela A Lucchesi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  Cellular, molecular, genomic changes occurring in the heart under mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Michele Gallo; Vincenzo Tarzia; Laura Iop; Jonida Bejko; Giacomo Bortolussi; Roberto Bianco; Tomaso Bottio; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

5.  S100A1 in human heart failure: lack of recovery following left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Mosi K Bennett; Wendy E Sweet; Sara Baicker-McKee; Elizabeth Looney; Kristen Karohl; Maria Mountis; W H Wilson Tang; Randall C Starling; Christine S Moravec
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 6.  Clinical, molecular, and genomic changes in response to a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hall; David R Fermin; Emma J Birks; Paul J R Barton; Mark Slaughter; Peter Eckman; Hideo A Baba; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Leslie W Miller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular function in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Jose Rivero; Patricia Campbell; Leslie Griffin; Colleen Smith; Courtney Foster; Brian Claggett; Robert J Glynn; Gregory Couper; Michael M Givertz; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 8.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Structural and functional cardiac profile after prolonged duration of mechanical unloading: potential implications for myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Estibaliz Castillero; Ziad A Ali; Hirokazu Akashi; Nicholas Giangreco; Catherine Wang; Eric J Stöhr; Ruping Ji; Xiaokan Zhang; Nathaniel Kheysin; Joo-Eun S Park; Sheetal Hegde; Sanatkumar Patel; Samantha Stein; Carlos Cuenca; Diana Leung; Shunichi Homma; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Veli K Topkara; Koji Takeda; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; H Lee Sweeney; P Christian Schulze; Isaac George
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Prolonged mechanical unloading affects cardiomyocyte excitation-contraction coupling, transverse-tubule structure, and the cell surface.

Authors:  Michael Ibrahim; Abeer Al Masri; Manoraj Navaratnarajah; Urszula Siedlecka; Gopal K Soppa; Alexey Moshkov; Sara Abou Al-Saud; Julia Gorelik; Magdi H Yacoub; Cesare M N Terracciano
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.