Literature DB >> 20043711

Developing next-generation telehealth tools and technologies: patients, systems, and data perspectives.

Michael J Ackerman1, Rosemarie Filart, Lawrence P Burgess, Insup Lee, Ronald K Poropatich.   

Abstract

The major goals of telemedicine today are to develop next-generation telehealth tools and technologies to enhance healthcare delivery to medically underserved populations using telecommunication technology, to increase access to medical specialty services while decreasing healthcare costs, and to provide training of healthcare providers, clinical trainees, and students in health-related fields. Key drivers for these tools and technologies are the need and interest to collaborate among telehealth stakeholders, including patients, patient communities, research funders, researchers, healthcare services providers, professional societies, industry, healthcare management/economists, and healthcare policy makers. In the development, marketing, adoption, and implementation of these tools and technologies, communication, training, cultural sensitivity, and end-user customization are critical pieces to the process. Next-generation tools and technologies are vehicles toward personalized medicine, extending the telemedicine model to include cell phones and Internet-based telecommunications tools for remote and home health management with video assessment, remote bedside monitoring, and patient-specific care tools with event logs, patient electronic profile, and physician note-writing capability. Telehealth is ultimately a system of systems in scale and complexity. To cover the full spectrum of dynamic and evolving needs of end-users, we must appreciate system complexity as telehealth moves toward increasing functionality, integration, interoperability, outreach, and quality of service. Toward that end, our group addressed three overarching questions: (1) What are the high-impact topics? (2) What are the barriers to progress? and (3) What roles can the National Institutes of Health and its various institutes and centers play in fostering the future development of telehealth?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20043711      PMCID: PMC2993051          DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  4 in total

1.  A pragmatic approach to implementing best practices for clinical decision support systems in computerized provider order entry systems.

Authors:  Peter A Gross; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service.

Authors:  Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Alison L Marshall; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Effect of clinical-decision support on documentation compliance in an electronic medical record.

Authors:  Shoshana Haberman; Joseph Feldman; Zaher O Merhi; Glenn Markenson; Wayne Cohen; Howard Minkoff
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Clinical decision support capabilities of commercially-available clinical information systems.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Sapna Sharma; Justine E Pang; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

  4 in total
  22 in total

1.  Endockscope: using mobile technology to create global point of service endoscopy.

Authors:  William Sohn; Samir Shreim; Renai Yoon; Victor B Huynh; Atreya Dash; Ralph Clayman; Hak J Lee
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Ethical practice in Telehealth and Telemedicine.

Authors:  Danielle Chaet; Ron Clearfield; James E Sabin; Kathryn Skimming
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Social Media and Allergy.

Authors:  Ves Dimov; Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada; Frank Eidelman
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  An information technology framework for strengthening telehealthcare service delivery.

Authors:  Li-Chin Chen; Chi-Wen Chen; Yung-Ching Weng; Rung-Ji Shang; Hui-Chu Yu; Yufang Chung; Feipei Lai
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Post-disaster Gulf Coast recovery using telehealth.

Authors:  Thomas J Kim; Martha I Arrieta; Sasha L Eastburn; Marjorie L Icenogle; Michelle Slagle; Azizeh H Nuriddin; Katrina M Brantley; Rachel D Foreman; Ayanna V Buckner
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 6.  Medical cyber-physical systems: A survey.

Authors:  Nilanjan Dey; Amira S Ashour; Fuqian Shi; Simon James Fong; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  Evolution of cognitive-behavioral therapy for eating disorders.

Authors:  W Stewart Agras; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Denise E Wilfley
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-01

8.  Developing personalized survivorship care pathways in the United States: Existing resources and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Deborah K Mayer; Stephanie B Wheeler; Justin G Trogdon; Jason Rotter; Sarah A Birken
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care : which providers prefer virtual care?

Authors:  Nikhil R Yedulla; Zachary A Montgomery; Dylan S Koolmees; Eric B Battista; Charles S Day
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools.

Authors:  Kit Huckvale; Mate Car; Cecily Morrison; Josip Car
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.