Literature DB >> 19567796

Clinical decision support capabilities of commercially-available clinical information systems.

Adam Wright1, Dean F Sittig, Joan S Ash, Sapna Sharma, Justine E Pang, Blackford Middleton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most effective decision support systems are integrated with clinical information systems, such as inpatient and outpatient electronic health records (EHRs) and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems. Purpose The goal of this project was to describe and quantify the results of a study of decision support capabilities in Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) certified electronic health record systems.
METHODS: The authors conducted a series of interviews with representatives of nine commercially available clinical information systems, evaluating their capabilities against 42 different clinical decision support features.
RESULTS: Six of the nine reviewed systems offered all the applicable event-driven, action-oriented, real-time clinical decision support triggers required for initiating clinical decision support interventions. Five of the nine systems could access all the patient-specific data items identified as necessary. Six of the nine systems supported all the intervention types identified as necessary to allow clinical information systems to tailor their interventions based on the severity of the clinical situation and the user's workflow. Only one system supported all the offered choices identified as key to allowing physicians to take action directly from within the alert. Discussion The principal finding relates to system-by-system variability. The best system in our analysis had only a single missing feature (from 42 total) while the worst had eighteen.This dramatic variability in CDS capability among commercially available systems was unexpected and is a cause for concern.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings have implications for four distinct constituencies: purchasers of clinical information systems, developers of clinical decision support, vendors of clinical information systems and certification bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567796      PMCID: PMC2744714          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  26 in total

1.  Using information systems to measure and improve quality.

Authors:  D W Bates; E Pappius; G J Kuperman; D Sittig; H Burstin; D Fairchild; T A Brennan; J M Teich
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1999 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.

Authors:  David W Bates; Gilad J Kuperman; Samuel Wang; Tejal Gandhi; Anne Kittler; Lynn Volk; Cynthia Spurr; Ramin Khorasani; Milenko Tanasijevic; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample.

Authors:  Steven M Asch; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Mary M Hogan; Rodney A Hayward; Paul Shekelle; Lisa Rubenstein; Joan Keesey; John Adams; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: Issues and examples.

Authors:  Adam Wright; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton; Tonya Hongsermeier; Vipul Kashyap; Sean M Thomas; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  A randomized trial of "corollary orders" to prevent errors of omission.

Authors:  J M Overhage; W M Tierney; X H Zhou; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Improving preventive care by prompting physicians.

Authors:  E A Balas; S Weingarten; C T Garb; D Blumenthal; S A Boren; G D Brown
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-02-14

8.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods.

Authors:  T Morimoto; T K Gandhi; A C Seger; T C Hsieh; D W Bates
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-08

10.  Computerized management of patient care in a complex, controlled clinical trial in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  D F Sittig; R M Gardner; N L Pace; A H Morris; E Beck
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1989 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  54 in total

1.  Electronic health record certification in oncology: role of the certification commission for health information technology.

Authors:  Robert S Miller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  A multi-layered framework for disseminating knowledge for computer-based decision support.

Authors:  Aziz A Boxwala; Beatriz H Rocha; Saverio Maviglia; Vipul Kashyap; Seth Meltzer; Jihoon Kim; Ruslana Tsurikova; Adam Wright; Marilyn D Paterno; Amanda Fairbanks; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  A set of preliminary standards recommended for achieving a national repository of clinical decision support interventions.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Adam Wright; Joan S Ash; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

4.  Trends in biomedical informatics: automated topic analysis of JAMIA articles.

Authors:  Dong Han; Shuang Wang; Chao Jiang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Hyeon-Eui Kim; Jimeng Sun; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Comparative outcome studies of clinical decision support software: limitations to the practice of evidence-based system acquisition.

Authors:  Gaurav Jay Dhiman; Kyle T Amber; Kenneth W Goodman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II: a public-access intensive care unit database.

Authors:  Mohammed Saeed; Mauricio Villarroel; Andrew T Reisner; Gari Clifford; Li-Wei Lehman; George Moody; Thomas Heldt; Tin H Kyaw; Benjamin Moody; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Utilization of genetic testing prior to subspecialist referral for cerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Brent L Fogel; Barbara G Vickrey; Jenny Walton-Wetzel; Eli Lieber; Carole H Browner
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-06-01

8.  Development and validation of a survey instrument for assessing prescribers' perception of computerized drug-drug interaction alerts.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Kathleen Fear; Bruce W Chaffee; Christopher R Zimmerman; Edward M Karls; Justin D Gatwood; James G Stevenson; Mark D Pearlman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Joshua Feblowitz; Seth Meltzer; Carmit McMullen; Ken Guappone; Jim Carpenter; Joshua Richardson; Linas Simonaitis; R Scott Evans; W Paul Nichol; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Comparison of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems and Content for Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  M Kantor; A Wright; M Burton; G Fraser; M Krall; S Maviglia; N Mohammed-Rajput; L Simonaitis; F Sonnenberg; B Middleton
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.