Literature DB >> 20043148

Manipulation of a fragile object.

Stacey L Gorniak1, Vladimir M Zatsiorsky, Mark L Latash.   

Abstract

We investigated strategies of adjustments in kinetic and kinematic patterns, and in multi-digit synergies during quick vertical transport of an instrumented handle that collapsed when the grasping force exceeded a certain magnitude (quantified with a fragility index). The collapse threshold of the object was set using a novel electromagnetic device. Moving a fragile object is viewed as a task with two constraints on the grip force defined by the slipping and crushing thresholds. When moving more fragile objects, subjects decreased object peak acceleration, increased movement time, showed a drop in the safety margin (SM) (extra force over the slipping threshold), and showed a tendency toward violating the minimum-jerk criterion. Linear regression analysis of grip force against load force has shown tight coupling between the two with a decline in the coefficient of determination with increased fragility index. The SM was lower in bimanual tasks, compared to unimanual tasks, for both fragile and non-fragile objects. Two novel indices have been introduced and studied, the SM due to fragility and the drop-crush index. Both indices showed a decrease with increased object fragility. Changes in the drop-crush index showed that the subjects would rather crush the fragile objects as opposed to dropping them, possibly reflecting the particular experimental procedure. We did not find differences between the performance indices of the dominant and non-dominant hand thus failing to support the recently formulated dominance hypothesis. The synergies stabilizing grip force were quantified at two levels of an assumed two-level control hierarchy using co-variation indices between elemental variables across trials. There were strong synergies at the upper level of the hierarchy (the task is shared between the opposing groups of digits) that weakened with an increase in object fragility. At the lower level (action of an effector is shared among the four fingers), higher fragility led to higher synergy indices. Analysis of force variance showed that an increase in object fragility was accompanied by exploring a smaller range of equivalent combinations of elemental variables. The additional constraint imposed by high fragility facilitated synergies at the lower level of the hierarchy, while there was evidence for a trade-off between synergies at the two levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; fragile object; hand; prehension; safety margin; synergy

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20043148      PMCID: PMC2943227          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2148-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  57 in total

1.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Parkinsonism reduces coordination of fingers, wrist, and arm in fine motor control.

Authors:  H L Teulings; J L Contreras-Vidal; G E Stelmach; C H Adler
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance.

Authors:  Jae K Shim; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motor control goes beyond physics: differential effects of gravity and inertia on finger forces during manipulation of hand-held objects.

Authors:  Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Fan Gao; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Joint coordination during bimanual transport of real and imaginary objects.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Anatol G Feldman; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling.

Authors:  V M Zatsiorsky; Z M Li; M L Latash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Principles for learning single-joint movements. II. Generalizing a learned behavior.

Authors:  S Jaric; D M Corcos; G C Agarwal; G L Gottlieb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hierarchical control of static prehension: I. Biomechanics.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  16 in total

1.  Grip forces during fast point-to-point and continuous hand movements.

Authors:  Paolo Viviani; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dynamic bimanual force control in chronic stroke: contribution of non-paretic and paretic hands.

Authors:  Prakruti Patel; Neha Lodha
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of task complexity on grip-to-load coordination in bimanual actions.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Coordination of contact forces during multifinger static prehension.

Authors:  Joel R Martin; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Simultaneous assessment of hand function and neuromuscular quickness through a static object manipulation task in healthy adults.

Authors:  Karen Haberland; Mehmet Uygur
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Manipulation of a fragile object by elderly individuals.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Eye movements during action preparation.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of aging on force coordination in bimanual task performance.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points?

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Eli Brenner; Willemijn D Schot; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Force coordination during bimanual task performance in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Andre G Machado; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.