Literature DB >> 20042997

A practical approach to genetic inducible fate mapping: a visual guide to mark and track cells in vivo.

Ashly Brown1, Stephen Brown, Debra Ellisor, Nellwyn Hagan, Elizabeth Normand, Mark Zervas.   

Abstract

Fate maps are generated by marking and tracking cells in vivo to determine how progenitors contribute to specific structures and cell types in developing and adult tissue. An advance in this concept is Genetic Inducible Fate Mapping (GIFM), linking gene expression, cell fate, and cell behaviors in vivo, to create fate maps based on genetic lineage. GIFM exploits X-CreER lines where X is a gene or set of gene regulatory elements that confers spatial expression of a modified bacteriophage protein, Cre recombinase (CreER(T)). CreER(T) contains a modified estrogen receptor ligand binding domain which renders CreER(T) sequestered in the cytoplasm in the absence of the drug tamoxifen. The binding of tamoxifen releases CreER(T), which translocates to the nucleus and mediates recombination between DNA sequences flanked by loxP sites. In GIFM, recombination typically occurs between a loxP flanked Stop cassette preceding a reporter gene such as GFP. Mice are bred to contain either a region- or cell type-specific CreER and a conditional reporter allele. Untreated mice will not have marking because the Stop cassette in the reporter prevents further transcription of the reporter gene. We administer tamoxifen by oral gavage to timed-pregnant females, which provides temporal control of CreER(T) release and subsequent translocation to the nucleus removing the Stop cassette from the reporter. Following recombination, the reporter allele is constitutively and heritably expressed. This series of events marks cells such that their genetic history is indelibly recorded. The recombined reporter thus serves as a high fidelity genetic lineage tracer that, once on, is uncoupled from the gene expression initially used to drive CreER(T). We apply GIFM in mouse to study normal development and ascertain the contribution of genetic lineages to adult cell types and tissues. We also use GIFM to follow cells on mutant genetic backgrounds to better understand complex phenotypes that mimic salient features of human genetic disorders. This video article guides researchers through experimental methods to successfully apply GIFM. We demonstrate the method using our well characterized Wnt1-CreER(T);mGFP mice by administering tamoxifen at embryonic day (E)8.5 via oral gavage followed by dissection at E12.5 and analysis by epifluorescence stereomicroscopy. We also demonstrate how to micro-dissect fate mapped domains for explant preparation or FACS analysis and dissect adult fate-mapped brains for whole mount fluorescent imaging. Collectively, these procedures allow researchers to address critical questions in developmental biology and disease models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20042997      PMCID: PMC2846818          DOI: 10.3791/1687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  2 in total

1.  Cell behaviors and genetic lineages of the mesencephalon and rhombomere 1.

Authors:  Mark Zervas; Sandrine Millet; Sohyun Ahn; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Comparative analysis of conditional reporter alleles in the developing embryo and embryonic nervous system.

Authors:  Debra Ellisor; Dorothy Koveal; Nellwyn Hagan; Ashly Brown; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 1.224

  2 in total
  11 in total

1.  Molecular organization and timing of Wnt1 expression define cohorts of midbrain dopamine neuron progenitors in vivo.

Authors:  Ashly Brown; Jason T Machan; Lindsay Hayes; Mark Zervas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  Alternative approaches to modeling hereditary dystonias.

Authors:  Rachel Fremont; Kamran Khodakhah
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Timing of Sonic hedgehog and Gli1 expression segregates midbrain dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Lindsay Hayes; Zhiwei Zhang; Paul Albert; Mark Zervas; Sohyun Ahn
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Wnt1 expression temporally allocates upper rhombic lip progenitors and defines their terminal cell fate in the cerebellum.

Authors:  Nellwyn Hagan; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.314

5.  Dynamic temporal requirement of Wnt1 in midbrain dopamine neuron development.

Authors:  Jasmine Yang; Ashly Brown; Debra Ellisor; Erin Paul; Nellwyn Hagan; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Genetic dissection of midbrain dopamine neuron development in vivo.

Authors:  Debra Ellisor; Caroline Rieser; Bettina Voelcker; Jason T Machan; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Duration of Shh signaling contributes to mDA neuron diversity.

Authors:  Lindsay Hayes; Sherry Ralls; Hui Wang; Sohyun Ahn
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Temporal and mosaic Tsc1 deletion in the developing thalamus disrupts thalamocortical circuitry, neural function, and behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Normand; Shane R Crandall; Catherine A Thorn; Emily M Murphy; Bettina Voelcker; Catherine Browning; Jason T Machan; Christopher I Moore; Barry W Connors; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The lineage contribution and role of Gbx2 in spinal cord development.

Authors:  Brian Luu; Debra Ellisor; Mark Zervas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Temporal Contribution of the Gbx2 Lineage to Cerebellar Neurons.

Authors:  Nellwyn Hagan; Juliana Guarente; Debra Ellisor; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.