Literature DB >> 19616131

Comparative analysis of conditional reporter alleles in the developing embryo and embryonic nervous system.

Debra Ellisor1, Dorothy Koveal, Nellwyn Hagan, Ashly Brown, Mark Zervas.   

Abstract

A long-standing problem in development is understanding how progenitor cells transiently expressing genes contribute to complex anatomical and functional structures. In the developing nervous system an additional level of complexity arises when considering how cells of distinct lineages relate to newly established neural circuits. To address these problems, we used both cumulative marking with Cre/loxP and Genetic Inducible Fate Mapping (GIFM), which permanently and heritably marks small populations of progenitors and their descendants with fine temporal control using CreER/loxP. A key component used in both approaches is a conditional phenotyping allele that has the potential to be expressed in all cell types, but is quiescent because of a loxP flanked Stop sequence, which precedes a reporter allele. Upon recombination, the resulting phenotyping allele is 'turned on' and then constitutively expressed. Thus, the reporter functions as a high fidelity genetic lineage tracer in vivo. Currently there is an array of reporter alleles that can be used in marking strategies, but their recombination efficiency and applicability to a wide array of tissues has not been thoroughly described. To assess the recombination/marking potential of the reporters, we utilized CreER(T) under the control of a Wnt1 transgene (Wnt1-CreER(T)) as well as a cumulative, non-inducible En1(Cre) knock-in line in combination with three different reporters: R26R (LacZ reporter), Z/EG (EGFP reporter), and Tau-Lox-STOP-Lox-mGFP-IRES-NLS-LacZ (membrane-targeted GFP/nuclear LacZ reporter). We marked the Wnt1 lineage using each of the three reporters at embryonic day (E) 8.5 followed by analysis at E10.0, E12.5, and in the adult. We also compared cumulative marking of cells with a history of En1 expression at the same stages. We evaluated the reporters by whole-mount and section analysis and ascertained the strengths and weaknesses of each of the reporters. Comparative analysis with the reporters elucidated complexities of how the Wnt1 and En1 lineages contribute to developing embryos and to axonal projection patterns of neurons derived from these lineages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19616131      PMCID: PMC2855890          DOI: 10.1016/j.gep.2009.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns        ISSN: 1567-133X            Impact factor:   1.224


  25 in total

1.  Axonal tau mRNA localization coincides with tau protein in living neuronal cells and depends on axonal targeting signal.

Authors:  S Aronov; G Aranda; L Behar; I Ginzburg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Two lineage boundaries coordinate vertebrate apical ectodermal ridge formation.

Authors:  R A Kimmel; D H Turnbull; V Blanquet; W Wurst; C A Loomis; A L Joyner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Fate map of mouse ventral limb ectoderm and the apical ectodermal ridge.

Authors:  Qiuxia Guo; Cynthia Loomis; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Cell behaviors and genetic lineages of the mesencephalon and rhombomere 1.

Authors:  Mark Zervas; Sandrine Millet; Sohyun Ahn; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Z/EG, a double reporter mouse line that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein upon Cre-mediated excision.

Authors:  A Novak; C Guo; W Yang; A Nagy; C G Lobe
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Efficient recombination in diverse tissues by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre: a tool for temporally regulated gene activation/inactivation in the mouse.

Authors:  Shigemi Hayashi; Andrew P McMahon
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  A Cre recombinase transgene with mosaic, widespread tamoxifen-inducible action.

Authors:  Caiying Guo; Wenyi Yang; Corrinne G Lobe
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Dynamic changes in the response of cells to positive hedgehog signaling during mouse limb patterning.

Authors:  Sohyun Ahn; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 is restricted to specific neural cells in the developing mouse embryo.

Authors:  D G Wilkinson; J A Bailes; A P McMahon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-07-03       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  En-1 and En-2, two mouse genes with sequence homology to the Drosophila engrailed gene: expression during embryogenesis.

Authors:  A L Joyner; G R Martin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  11 in total

1.  Molecular organization and timing of Wnt1 expression define cohorts of midbrain dopamine neuron progenitors in vivo.

Authors:  Ashly Brown; Jason T Machan; Lindsay Hayes; Mark Zervas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Timing of Sonic hedgehog and Gli1 expression segregates midbrain dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Lindsay Hayes; Zhiwei Zhang; Paul Albert; Mark Zervas; Sohyun Ahn
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Wnt1 expression temporally allocates upper rhombic lip progenitors and defines their terminal cell fate in the cerebellum.

Authors:  Nellwyn Hagan; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.314

4.  Common partner Smad-independent canonical bone morphogenetic protein signaling in the specification process of the anterior rhombic lip during cerebellum development.

Authors:  Ka Kui Tong; Kin Ming Kwan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Dynamic temporal requirement of Wnt1 in midbrain dopamine neuron development.

Authors:  Jasmine Yang; Ashly Brown; Debra Ellisor; Erin Paul; Nellwyn Hagan; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Genetic dissection of midbrain dopamine neuron development in vivo.

Authors:  Debra Ellisor; Caroline Rieser; Bettina Voelcker; Jason T Machan; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  A practical approach to genetic inducible fate mapping: a visual guide to mark and track cells in vivo.

Authors:  Ashly Brown; Stephen Brown; Debra Ellisor; Nellwyn Hagan; Elizabeth Normand; Mark Zervas
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Temporal and mosaic Tsc1 deletion in the developing thalamus disrupts thalamocortical circuitry, neural function, and behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Normand; Shane R Crandall; Catherine A Thorn; Emily M Murphy; Bettina Voelcker; Catherine Browning; Jason T Machan; Christopher I Moore; Barry W Connors; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The lineage contribution and role of Gbx2 in spinal cord development.

Authors:  Brian Luu; Debra Ellisor; Mark Zervas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Temporal Contribution of the Gbx2 Lineage to Cerebellar Neurons.

Authors:  Nellwyn Hagan; Juliana Guarente; Debra Ellisor; Mark Zervas
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.