Literature DB >> 20042478

Transdermal fentanyl for pain caused by radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients treated in an outpatient setting: a multicenter trial in Taiwan.

Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang1, Chien Yu Lin, Jin-Ching Lin, Moon-Sing Lee, Yu-Jen Chen, Hung-Ming Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl in the outpatient treatment of head and neck cancer patients with pain caused by radiotherapy.
METHODS: Patients with a visual analogue scale score >or=4 were invited to participate in the study. The following variables were collected: visual analogue scale, the Brief Pain Inventory, concomitant pain medications and adverse effects. A total of 163 head and neck cancer patients were enrolled (148 males and 15 females; median age, 53 years; age range, 21-72 years). Seventy-two (44%) patients had a visual analogue scale score >6 at enrollment, despite the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or weak opioids. Ninety-four (57.7%) patients received concurrent chemotherapy.
RESULTS: A total of 88 patients completed the study, whereas 55 underwent a drop-out by side effects. The most frequently reported adverse events were vomiting (23.9%) and nausea (16.6%). Treatment with transdermal fentanyl resulted in a significant decrease in visual analogue scale and Brief Pain Inventory scores that persisted during treatment. In the overall efficacy evaluation, the pain-alleviating effect, the easiness of application and the overall impression of transdermal fentanyl were rated as good by 54.5%, 65.9% and 59.1% of the completers, respectively. Effects of transdermal fentanyl were rated as good by 64.8% of the investigators.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that transdermal fentanyl is effective and relatively easy to use for outpatient treatment of pain control in head and neck cancer patients following radiotherapy in selected patients. Reduction of side effects and effective pain management need to be paramount in the management of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20042478     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyp166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Correlation of Planned Dose to Area Postrema and Dorsal Vagal Complex with Clinical Symptoms of Nausea and Vomiting in Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC) patients treated with radiation alone using IMRT.

Authors:  Tony J C Wang; Sandra Fontenla; Patrick McCann; Robert J Young; Stephen McNamara; Shyam Rao; James G Mechalakos; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-02-28

2.  Predictors of acute throat or esophageal patient reported pain during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hiram A Gay; Jung Hun Oh; Aditya P Apte; Mackenzie D Daly; Douglas R Adkins; Jason Rich; Peter J Oppelt; Pawel T Dyk; Daniel F Mullen; Laura Eschen; Re-I Chin; Brian Nussenbaum; Bruce H Haughey; Wade L Thorstad; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-04

3.  The use of fentanyl in pain management in head and neck cancer patients: a narrative review.

Authors:  Raffaele Giusti; Paolo Bossi; Marco Mazzotta; Marco Filetti; Daniela Iacono; Paolo Marchetti
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2017-10-10

4.  Pain management during radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy in oropharyngeal cancer patients: single-institution experience.

Authors:  Monika Konopka-Filippow; Ewa Zabrocka; Aleksandra Wójtowicz; Piotr Skalij; Marek Z Wojtukiewicz; Ewa Sierko
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Transdermal fentanyl for pain due to chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in nasopharyngeal cancer patients: evaluating efficacy, safety, and improvement in quality of life.

Authors:  Su-Ping Guo; San-Gang Wu; Juan Zhou; Hui-Xia Feng; Feng-Yan Li; Ying-Jia Wu; Jia-Yuan Sun; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.