Literature DB >> 20041599

Dream-enacting behaviors in a normal population.

Tore Nielsen1, Connie Svob, Don Kuiken.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Determine the prevalence and gender distributions of behaviors enacted during dreaming ("dream-enacting [DE] behaviors") in a normal population; the independence of such behaviors from other parasomnias; and the influence of different question wordings, socially desirable responding and personality on prevalence.
DESIGN: 3-group questionnaire study.
SETTING: University classrooms PARTICIPANTS: Three undergraduate samples (Ns = 443, 201, 496; mean ages = 19.9 +/- 3.2 y; 20.1 +/- 3.4 y; 19.1 +/- 1.6 y).
INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Subjects completed questionnaires about DE behaviors and Social Desirability. Study 1 employed a nonspecific question about the behaviors, Study 2 employed the same question with examples, and Study 3 employed 7 questions describing specific behavior subtypes (speaking, crying, smiling/laughing, fear, anger, movement, sexual arousal). Somnambulism, somniloquy, nightmares, dream recall, alexithymia, and absorption were also assessed. Factor analyses were conducted to determine relationships among DE behaviors and their independence from other parasomnias. Prevalence increased with increasing question specificity (35.9%, 76.7%, and 98.2% for the 3 samples). No gender difference obtained for the nonspecific question, but robust differences occurred for more specific questions. Females reported more speaking, crying, fear and smiling/laughing than did males; males reported more sexual arousal. When controlling other parasomnias and dream recall frequency, these differences persisted. Factor solutions revealed that DE behaviors were independent of other parasomnias and of dream recall frequency, except for an association between dream-talking and somniloquy. Sexual arousal was related only to age. Behaviors were independent of alexithymia but moderately related to absorption.
CONCLUSIONS: Dream-enacting behaviors are prevalent in healthy subjects and sensitive to question wording but not social desirability. Subtypes are related, differ with gender and occur independently of other parasomnias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20041599      PMCID: PMC2786047          DOI: 10.1093/sleep/32.12.1629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  16 in total

1.  Spontaneous muscle twitches during sleep guide spinal self-organization.

Authors:  Per Petersson; Alexandra Waldenström; Christer Fåhraeus; Jens Schouenborg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sexsomnia--a new parasomnia?

Authors:  Colin M Shapiro; Nikola N Trajanovic; J Paul Fedoroff
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 3.  Dissociated states of wakefulness and sleep.

Authors:  M W Mahowald; C H Schenck
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Parasomnias decline during pregnancy.

Authors:  C Hedman; T Pohjasvaara; U Tolonen; A Salmivaara; V V Myllylä
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.209

5.  The value of sleep deprivation as a diagnostic tool in adult sleepwalkers.

Authors:  Steve Joncas; Antonio Zadra; Jean Paquet; Jacques Montplaisir
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility.

Authors:  A Tellegen; G Atkinson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1974-06

7.  One explanatory basis for the discrepancy of reported prevalences of sleep paralysis among healthy respondents.

Authors:  K Fukuda
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1993-12

Review 8.  Evolving concepts of human state dissociation.

Authors:  M W Mahowald; C H Schenck
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  The links between the Adolescent Dissociative Experiences Scale (A-DES), fantasy proneness, and anxiety symptoms.

Authors:  Peter Muris; Harald Merckelbach; Elke Peeters
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.254

10.  Nonviolent elaborate behaviors may also occur in REM sleep behavior disorder.

Authors:  D Oudiette; V C De Cock; S Lavault; S Leu; M Vidailhet; I Arnulf
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  15 in total

1.  Diagnostic delay in REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD).

Authors:  Caroline White; Elizabeth A Hill; Ian Morrison; Renata L Riha
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  REM sleep behavior disorder in the Korean elderly population: prevalence and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Suk-Hoon Kang; In-Young Yoon; Sang Don Lee; Ji Won Han; Tae Hui Kim; Ki Woong Kim
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Dream enactment behavior: review for the clinician.

Authors:  Marc Baltzan; Chun Yao; Dorrie Rizzo; Ron Postuma
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 4.  Parasomnias: an updated review.

Authors:  Michael J Howell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  A scale for assessing the severity of arousal disorders.

Authors:  Isabelle Arnulf; Bin Zhang; Ginevra Uguccioni; Mathilde Flamand; Alix Noël de Fontréaux; Smaranda Leu-Semenescu; Agnès Brion
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Tickle me, I think I might be dreaming! Sensory attenuation, self-other distinction, and predictive processing in lucid dreams.

Authors:  Jennifer M Windt; Dominic L Harkness; Bigna Lenggenhager
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Active Reward Processing during Human Sleep: Insights from Sleep-Related Eating Disorder.

Authors:  Lampros Perogamvros; Patrick Baud; Roland Hasler; Claude Robert Cloninger; Sophie Schwartz; Stephen Perrig
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Reporting dream experience: Why (not) to be skeptical about dream reports.

Authors:  Jennifer M Windt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Why are dreams interesting for philosophers? The example of minimal phenomenal selfhood, plus an agenda for future research.

Authors:  Thomas Metzinger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 10.  A Neurologist's Guide to REM Sleep Behavior Disorder.

Authors:  Amber Roguski; Dane Rayment; Alan L Whone; Matt W Jones; Michal Rolinski
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.