Literature DB >> 20038188

Combining machine learning and pharmacophore-based interaction fingerprint for in silico screening.

Tomohiro Sato1, Teruki Honma, Shigeyuki Yokoyama.   

Abstract

In this study, we developed a new pharmacophore-based interaction fingerprint (Pharm-IF) and examined its usefulness for in silico screening using machine learning techniques such as support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) instead of similarity-based ranking. Using the docking results of PKA, SRC, cathepsin K, carbonic anhydrase II, and HIV-1 protease, the screening efficiencies of the Pharm-IF models were compared to GLIDE score and the residue-based IF (PLIF) models. The combination of SVM and Pharm-IF demonstrated a higher enrichment factor at 10% (5.7 on average) than those of GLIDE score (4.2) and PLIF (4.3). In terms of the size of the training sets, learning more than five crystal structures enabled the machine learning models to stably achieve better efficiencies than GLIDE score. We also employed the docking poses of known active compounds, in addition to the crystal structures, as positive samples of training sets. The enrichment factors of the RF models at 10% using the docking poses for SRC and cathepsin K showed significantly higher values (6.5 and 6.3) than those using only the crystal structures (3.9 and 3.2), respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20038188     DOI: 10.1021/ci900382e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  28 in total

Review 1.  From laptop to benchtop to bedside: structure-based drug design on protein targets.

Authors:  Lu Chen; John K Morrow; Hoang T Tran; Sharangdhar S Phatak; Lei Du-Cuny; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

2.  Protein-Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Matthew Ragoza; Joshua Hochuli; Elisa Idrobo; Jocelyn Sunseri; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  A D3R prospective evaluation of machine learning for protein-ligand scoring.

Authors:  Jocelyn Sunseri; Matthew Ragoza; Jasmine Collins; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A machine learning-based method to improve docking scoring functions and its application to drug repurposing.

Authors:  Sarah L Kinnings; Nina Liu; Peter J Tonge; Richard M Jackson; Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Characterization of small molecule binding. I. Accurate identification of strong inhibitors in virtual screening.

Authors:  Bo Ding; Jian Wang; Nan Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Molecular Docking: From Lock and Key to Combination Lock.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tripathi; Vytas A Bankaitis
Journal:  J Mol Med Clin Appl       Date:  2017-02-10

7.  An efficient multistep ligand-based virtual screening approach for GPR40 agonists.

Authors:  Sihui Yao; Tao Lu; Zifan Zhou; Haichun Liu; Haoliang Yuan; Ting Ran; Shuai Lu; Yanmin Zhang; Zhipeng Ke; Jinxing Xu; Xiao Xiong; Yadong Chen
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.943

8.  Fragment-Based Analysis of Ligand Dockings Improves Classification of Actives.

Authors:  Richard K Belew; Stefano Forli; David S Goodsell; T J O'Donnell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Shuangye Yin; Xiang S Wang; Shubin Liu; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Proteochemometric modeling of the bioactivity spectra of HIV-1 protease inhibitors by introducing protein-ligand interaction fingerprint.

Authors:  Qi Huang; Haixiao Jin; Qi Liu; Qiong Wu; Hong Kang; Zhiwei Cao; Ruixin Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.