Literature DB >> 20035346

The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience.

Yong Wook Jung1, Young Tae Kim, Dae Woo Lee, Yu Im Hwang, Eun Ji Nam, Jae Hoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of single-port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) for hysterectomy and elaborate on our experience in order to introduce the single-port approach for gynecologic surgery.
METHODS: Between August 2008 and February 2009, 30 patients who initially planned to undergo single-port laparoscopic surgery at Yonsei University Health System in Seoul, Korea were enrolled in this study. The authors used a single-port three-channel system with a wound retractor, surgical gloves, and one 10/11-mm and two 5-mm trocars. All surgical procedures were performed with 30 degrees , 5-mm laparoscope, conventional laparoscopic instruments, and the LigaSure system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA). Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were prospectively evaluated. A visual analog score (VAS) scale was used to measure postoperative pain.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 30 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic surgery without conversion to laparotomy or conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Median operative time was 100 min (57-155 min), median blood loss was 100 ml (10-400 ml), median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (2-6 days), and median weight of resected uteri was 167 g (45-482 g). VAS scoring of pain at 6, 24, and 48 h after surgery was 4, 3, and 2, respectively. There were no operative complications.
CONCLUSION: SPLS is a feasible approach for hysterectomy in terms of operative time, complication rates, and cosmetic results. However, the possible benefits for patients such as better cosmetic outcomes, reduced pain, and lower complication rates should be evaluated in randomized prospective studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035346     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0830-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy).

Authors:  M A Pelosi; M A Pelosi
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Current status of elective sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  J F Hulka
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The location of abdominal wall blood vessels in relationship to abdominal landmarks apparent at laparoscopy.

Authors:  W W Hurd; R O Bude; J O DeLancey; J S Newman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  L E Smale; M L Smale; R L Wilkening; C F Mundy; T L Ewing
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-05-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction.

Authors:  Agnaldo L Silva-Filho; Rogéria Andrade Werneck; Rúbia Sena de Magalhães; Andrezza V Belo; Sérgio A Triginelli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Laparoscopic transillumination for the location of anterior abdominal wall blood vessels.

Authors:  E H Quint; F L Wang; W W Hurd
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1996-06

7.  Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.

Authors:  S R Kovac
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases.

Authors:  Prashanth P Rao; Sonali M Bhagwat; Abhay Rane; Pradeep P Rao
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Authors:  Javier F Magrina; Rosanne M Kho; Amy L Weaver; Regina P Montero; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Christian Schindlbeck; Konstanze Klauser; Darius Dian; Wolfgang Janni; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  19 in total

1.  Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.

Authors:  Mete Gungor; Korhan Kahraman; Polat Dursun; Esra Ozbasli; Canan Genim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-20

2.  A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Yong Wook Jung; Maria Lee; Ga Won Yim; San Hui Lee; Ji Heum Paek; Ha Yan Kwon; Eun Ji Nam; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Long-term Experience of Single-port and Multi-port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Single Center.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Yoon Soon Lee; Dae Gy Hong
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Tissue injuries after single-port and multiport laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyeong A So; Jae Kwan Lee; Jae Yun Song; Jae Won Kim; Nak Woo Lee; Kyung-Do Ki; Jong-Min Lee; Yong Jung Song; Yong Jin Na; Chun Hoe Ku; Jin Woo Shin; Chul Jung Kim; Un Suk Jung
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Minimally Invasive Surgical Outcomes in Advanced Gastric Cancer: An International Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Yongjia Yan; Annie Yang; Li Lu; Zhicheng Zhao; Chuan Li; Weidong Li; Joseph Chao; Tong Liu; Yuman Fong; Weihua Fu; Yanghee Woo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy with an accessory lateral port: surgical results in 237 patients and 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Carlos Farías; José Ignacio Fernández; Cristián Ovalle; Carolina Cabrera; Jaime de la Maza; Karin Kosiel; Ana María Molina
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynaecology: A new frontier in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Amanda Nickles Fader; Kimberly L Levinson; Camille C Gunderson; Abigail D Winder; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Robotic single-port transumbilical total hysterectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Eun Ji Nam; Sang Wun Kim; Maria Lee; Ga Won Yim; Ji Heum Paek; San Hui Lee; Sunghoon Kim; Jae Hoon Kim; Jae Wook Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Single-port access laparoscopic hysterectomy: a new dimension of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Mereu Liliana; Pontis Alessandro; Carri Giada; Mencaglia Luca
Journal:  J Gynecol Endosc Surg       Date:  2011-01

10.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yeon Jean Cho; Mi-La Kim; Soo Yoon Lee; Hee Suk Lee; Joo Myoung Kim; Kwan Young Joo
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.