G Wynne-Jones1, C D Mallen, C J Main, K M Dunn. 1. Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK. g.wynne-jones@cphc.keele.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: GPs typically sanction absence from work by issuing sickness certificates. There has been some debate recently about changing the way sickness certificates are issued and by whom. However, without understanding GPs' certification practices, their requirements in terms of training and education and how they feel the certification process should or should not be changed, measures aimed at improving the system are unlikely to succeed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate and describe British GPs' sickness certification practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional nationwide postal survey of 2154 UK GPs was conducted. GPs were asked about perceived certification practices, training in sickness certification, their opinions about the certification process and potential to improve the system. RESULTS: Adjusted response was 42% (n = 878). GPs do ask about a patient's work situation but lack training in sickness certification. GPs would like to maintain their role in sickness certification but felt there was scope for other health professionals to issue some sickness certificates. GPs report more frequent sickness certification for mental health and musculoskeletal conditions compared to any other condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study has highlighted the main issues that GPs face during a consultation where sickness certification is a possible outcome. Lack of training in certification was a recurrent theme. However, GPs felt there was scope to improve training and recommendations were made as to how this might be achieved. The survey has highlighted that GPs feel there are opportunities to improve the system and that other health professionals may play a role in the certification process.
BACKGROUND: GPs typically sanction absence from work by issuing sickness certificates. There has been some debate recently about changing the way sickness certificates are issued and by whom. However, without understanding GPs' certification practices, their requirements in terms of training and education and how they feel the certification process should or should not be changed, measures aimed at improving the system are unlikely to succeed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate and describe British GPs' sickness certification practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional nationwide postal survey of 2154 UK GPs was conducted. GPs were asked about perceived certification practices, training in sickness certification, their opinions about the certification process and potential to improve the system. RESULTS: Adjusted response was 42% (n = 878). GPs do ask about a patient's work situation but lack training in sickness certification. GPs would like to maintain their role in sickness certification but felt there was scope for other health professionals to issue some sickness certificates. GPs report more frequent sickness certification for mental health and musculoskeletal conditions compared to any other condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study has highlighted the main issues that GPs face during a consultation where sickness certification is a possible outcome. Lack of training in certification was a recurrent theme. However, GPs felt there was scope to improve training and recommendations were made as to how this might be achieved. The survey has highlighted that GPs feel there are opportunities to improve the system and that other health professionals may play a role in the certification process.
Authors: Christina Lindholm; Mia von Knorring; Britt Arrelöv; Gunnar Nilsson; Elin Hinas; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2013-05-23