Literature DB >> 22137416

Fit for purpose? Using the fit note with patients with chronic pain: a qualitative study.

Elaine Wainwright1, David Wainwright, Edmund Keogh, Christopher Eccleston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staying in work may benefit patients with chronic pain, but can be difficult for GPs to negotiate with patients and their employers. The new fit note is designed to help this process, but little is known of how it is operating. AIM: To explore GPs' views on the fit note, with particular reference to sickness certification for patients with chronic pain. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews in eight primary care trusts in south-west England.
METHOD: In-depth interviews with 13 GPs.
RESULTS: GPs reported that the rationale behind the fit note is sound and that it may help patients with chronic pain to return to work earlier. However, GPs also reported barriers to successful fit note use, including the need to preserve doctor-patient relationships, inconsistent engagement from employers, GPs' lack of specialist occupational health knowledge, issues with fit note training, and whether a new form can achieve cultural shift.
CONCLUSION: While doctors agree that good work improves health outcomes, they do not think that fit notes will greatly alter sickness-certification rates without more concerted initiatives to manage the tripartite negotiation between doctor, patient, and employer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137416      PMCID: PMC3223777          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X613133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  22 in total

Review 1.  Functional somatic syndromes: one or many?

Authors:  S Wessely; C Nimnuan; M Sharpe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the 'soft' option, or a form of sociological imperialism?

Authors:  A Chapple; A Rogers
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  The influence of change of legislation concerning sickness absence on physicians' performance as certifiers. A population-based study.

Authors:  Britt Arrelöv; Lars Borgquist; Dan Ljungberg; Kurt Svärdsudd
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Sickness absence: causes, consequences, and physicians' sickness certification practice. A systematic literature review by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU).

Authors: 
Journal:  Scand J Public Health Suppl       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Judging without criteria? Sickness certification in Dutch disability schemes.

Authors:  Agnes Meershoek; Anja Krumeich; Rein Vos
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2007-05

6.  How physicians have learned to handle sickness-certification cases.

Authors:  Anna Löfgren; Charlotte Silén; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study.

Authors:  C A Barry; C P Bradley; N Britten; F A Stevenson; N Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

Review 8.  Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  Jos Verbeek; Marie-José Sengers; Linda Riemens; Joke Haafkens
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Patient, clinician, and general practice factors in long-term certified sickness.

Authors:  Christopher Shiels; Mark B Gabbay
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland.

Authors:  Susan Hussey; Pat Hoddinott; Phil Wilson; Jon Dowell; Rosaline Barbour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-22
View more
  7 in total

1.  Work Experiences During and After Treatment Among Self-Employed People with Cancer.

Authors:  Steffen Torp; Birgit Brusletto; Tina B Withbro; Bente Nygaard; Linda Sharp
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-03

2.  General practitioners and sickness certification for injury in Australia.

Authors:  Danielle Mazza; Bianca Brijnath; Nabita Singh; Agnieszka Kosny; Rasa Ruseckaite; Alex Collie
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Recommendations to facilitate the ideal fit note: are they achievable in practice?

Authors:  Carol Coole; Fiona Nouri; Iskra Potgieter; Paul J Watson; Louise Thomson; Rob Hampton; Avril Drummond
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Application of the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel to Understand Physicians' Behaviors and Behavior Change in Using Temporary Work Modifications for Return to Work: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Ritva Horppu; K P Martimo; E MacEachen; T Lallukka; E Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03

Review 5.  The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Mary Grant; Joanne O-Beirne-Elliman; Robert Froud; Martin Underwood; Kate Seers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Assessing work capacity - reviewing the what and how of physicians' clinical practice.

Authors:  P Nordling; G Priebe; C Björkelund; G Hensing
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Occupational Physicians' Reasoning about Recommending Early Return to Work with Work Modifications.

Authors:  Ritva Horppu; Kari-Pekka Martimo; Eira Viikari-Juntura; Tea Lallukka; Ellen MacEachen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.