Literature DB >> 20034592

Effects of pulsed, spatially fractionated, microscopic synchrotron X-ray beams on normal and tumoral brain tissue.

E Bräuer-Krisch1, R Serduc, E A Siegbahn, G Le Duc, Y Prezado, A Bravin, H Blattmann, J A Laissue.   

Abstract

Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) uses highly collimated, quasi-parallel arrays of X-ray microbeams of 50-600keV, produced by third generation synchrotron sources, such as the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), in France. The main advantages of highly brilliant synchrotron sources are an extremely high dose rate and very small beam divergence. High dose rates are necessary to deliver therapeutic doses in microscopic volumes, to avoid spreading of the microbeams by cardiosynchronous movement of the tissues. The minimal beam divergence results in the advantage of steeper dose gradients delivered to a tumor target, thus achieving a higher dose deposition in the target volume in fractions of seconds, with a sharper penumbra than that produced in conventional radiotherapy. MRT research over the past 20 years has yielded many results from preclinical trials based on different animal models, including mice, rats, piglets and rabbits. Typically, MRT uses arrays of narrow ( approximately 25-100 microm wide) microplanar beams separated by wider (100-400 microm centre-to-centre) microplanar spaces. The height of these microbeams typically varies from 1 to 100 mm, depending on the target and the desired preselected field size to be irradiated. Peak entrance doses of several hundreds of Gy are surprisingly well tolerated by normal tissues, up to approximately 2 yr after irradiation, and at the same time show a preferential damage of malignant tumor tissues; these effects of MRT have now been extensively studied over nearly two decades. More recently, some biological in vivo effects of synchrotron X-ray beams in the millimeter range (0.68-0.95 mm, centre-to-centre distances 1.2-4 mm), which may differ to some extent from those of microscopic beams, have been followed up to approximately 7 months after irradiation. Comparisons between broad-beam irradiation and MRT indicate a higher tumor control for the same sparing of normal tissue in the latter, even if a substantial fraction of tumor cells are not receiving a radiotoxic level of radiation. The hypothesis of a selective radiovulnerability of the tumor vasculature versus normal blood vessels by MRT, and of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved remains under investigation. The paper highlights the history of MRT including salient biological findings after microbeam irradiation with emphasis on the vascular components and the tolerance of the central nervous system. Details on experimental and theoretical dosimetry of microbeams, core issues and possible therapeutic applications of MRT are presented. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20034592     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  26 in total

1.  Interactions between synchrotron radiation X-ray and biological tissues - theoretical and clinical significance.

Authors:  Heyu Chen; Xin He; Caibin Sheng; Yingxin Ma; Hui Nie; Weiliang Xia; Weihai Ying
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-11

Review 2.  Microirradiation techniques in radiobiological research.

Authors:  Guido A Drexler; Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Microbeam radiation therapy alters vascular architecture and tumor oxygenation and is enhanced by a galectin-1 targeted anti-angiogenic peptide.

Authors:  Robert J Griffin; Nathan A Koonce; Ruud P M Dings; Eric Siegel; Eduardo G Moros; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Peter M Corry
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Biodosimetric quantification of short-term synchrotron microbeam versus broad-beam radiation damage to mouse skin using a dermatopathological scoring system.

Authors:  R C U Priyadarshika; J C Crosbie; B Kumar; P A W Rogers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Effects of high-dose microbeam irradiation on tumor microvascular function and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Andrew N Fontanella; Mary-Keara Boss; Michael Hadsell; Jian Zhang; Thies Schroeder; Katherine G Berman; Mark W Dewhirst; Sha Chang; Gregory M Palmer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Microbeam Radiotherapy Provides Superior Normal Tissue Sparing in Rat Lung Compared to Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael D Wright; Pantaleo Romanelli; Alberto Bravin; Geraldine Le Duc; Elke Brauer-Krisch; Herwig Requardt; Stefan Bartzsch; Ruslan Hlushchuk; Jean-Albert Laissue; Valentin Djonov
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-06

7.  Treating Brain Tumor with Microbeam Radiation Generated by a Compact Carbon-Nanotube-Based Irradiator: Initial Radiation Efficacy Study.

Authors:  Hong Yuan; Lei Zhang; Jonathan E Frank; Christina R Inscoe; Laurel M Burk; Mike Hadsell; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  A first generation compact microbeam radiation therapy system based on carbon nanotube X-ray technology.

Authors:  M Hadsell; J Zhang; P Laganis; F Sprenger; J Shan; L Zhang; L Burk; H Yuan; S Chang; J Lu; O Zhou
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Synchrotron-generated microbeam sensorimotor cortex transections induce seizure control without disruption of neurological functions.

Authors:  Pantaleo Romanelli; Erminia Fardone; Giuseppe Battaglia; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Yolanda Prezado; Herwig Requardt; Geraldine Le Duc; Christian Nemoz; David J Anschel; Jenny Spiga; Alberto Bravin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pencilbeam irradiation technique for whole brain radiotherapy: technical and biological challenges in a small animal model.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schültke; Michael Trippel; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Michel Renier; Stefan Bartzsch; Herwig Requardt; Máté D Döbrössy; Guido Nikkhah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.