Literature DB >> 20033461

Quantitative assessment of myelopathy patients using motor evoked potentials produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Toshio Nakamae1, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi, Yoshinori Fujimoto, Hirofumi Sasaki, Naosuke Kamei, Takahiko Hamasaki, Kiyotaka Yamada, Risako Yamamoto, Bunichiro Izumi, Mitsuo Ochi.   

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) study using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may give a functional assessment of corticospinal conduction. But there are no large studies on MEPs using TMS in myelopathy patients. The purpose of this study is to confirm the usefulness of MEPs for the assessment of the myelopathy and to investigate the use of MEPs using TMS as a screening tool for myelopathy. We measured the MEPs of 831 patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of myelopathy using TMS. The MEPs from the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles were evoked by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time from the MEP latency. Later, 349 patients had surgery for myelopathy (operative group) and 482 patients were treated conservatively (nonoperative group). CMCTs in the operative group and nonoperative group were assessed. MEPs were prolonged in 711 patients (86%) and CMCTs were prolonged in 493 patients (59%) compared with the control patients. CMCTs from the ADM and AH in the operative group were significantly more prolonged than that in the nonoperative group. All patients in the operative group showed prolongation of MEPs or CMCTs or multiphase of the MEP wave. MEP abnormalities are useful for an electrophysiological evaluation of myelopathy patients. Moreover, MEPs may be effective parameters in spinal pathology for deciding the operative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033461      PMCID: PMC2899952          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1246-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Cervical magnetic stimulation: the role of the neural foramen.

Authors:  C M Epstein; E Fernandez-Beer; J D Weissman; S Matsuura
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Clinical evaluation of magnetic stimulation in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  D J Jaskolski; J A Jarratt; J Jakubowski
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 3.  The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  Robert Chen; Didier Cros; Antonio Curra; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Michel R Magistris; Kerry Mills; Kai M Rösler; William J Triggs; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Motor evoked potentials elicited from erector spinae muscles in patients with thoracic myelopathy.

Authors:  S Taniguchi; T Tani; T Ushida; H Yamamoto
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Measurement of central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis by magnetic brain stimulation.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex.

Authors:  A T Barker; R Jalinous; I L Freeston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Mechanism of prolonged central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  K Kaneko; T Taguchi; H Morita; H Yonemura; H Fujimoto; S Kawai
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage.

Authors:  K Ono; S Ebara; T Fuji; K Yonenobu; K Fujiwara; K Yamashita
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-03

9.  Principles and pitfalls of nerve conduction studies.

Authors:  J Kimura
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine.

Authors:  H Ogino; K Tada; K Okada; K Yonenobu; T Yamamoto; K Ono; H Namiki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of corticospinal excitability in cervical myelopathy, before and after surgery, with transcranial magnetic stimulation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alessia Nicotra; Nicolas K K King; Maria Catley; Nigel Mendoza; Alison H McGregor; Paul H Strutton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A supplementary system for a brain-machine interface based on jaw artifacts for the bidimensional control of a robotic arm.

Authors:  Álvaro Costa; Enrique Hortal; Eduardo Iáñez; José M Azorín
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Relationship Between Motor Evoked Potential Response and the Severity of Paralysis in Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

Authors:  Mi-Kyoung Oh; Hye-Ri Kim; Won-Seok Kim; Hyung Ik Shin
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  Multimodal Evaluation of TMS - Induced Somatosensory Plasticity and Behavioral Recovery in Rats With Contusion Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Vijai S Krishnan; Samuel S Shin; Visar Belegu; Pablo Celnik; Mark Reimers; Kylie R Smith; Galit Pelled
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Application of electrophysiological measures in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhengran Yu; Wenxu Pan; Jiacheng Chen; Xinsheng Peng; Zemin Ling; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-08-09

7.  Wide-pulse, high-frequency, low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation has potential for targeted strengthening of an intrinsic foot muscle: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Darren C James; Matthew C Solan; Katya N Mileva
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.303

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.