Literature DB >> 20033205

Use of continuous glucose monitoring in normoglycemic, insulin-resistant women.

Rebecca E Hasson1, Patty S Freedson, Barry Braun.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare fasting and post-prandial glucose concentrations measured in venous blood with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived values, with and without prior exercise, in insulin-resistant, normoglycemic women. Interstitial and venous glucose concentrations were assessed in ten sedentary, overweight/obese African-American women following a sedentary condition (75 min of rest) and following an exercise condition (75 min of brisk walking on a treadmill). Ninety minutes after rest or exercise, participants completed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). In response to the OGTT, CGM-derived glucose area under the curves (AUC) were lower than venous values in the exercise condition (-25%, p = 0.03) but this difference was attenuated in the sedentary condition (-10%, p = 0.09). Additionally, CGM-derived absolute glucose values (mMol) were significantly lower compared to venous values during the sedentary (p = 0.007) and exercise conditions (p = 0.006). Overall, there was a moderately strong relationship between venous and CGM-derived glucose AUC (r (2) = 0.68) but the CGM-derived values were consistently lower in this study group. Although CGM provided more information regarding post-prandial glucose responses, these results suggest that CGM may not closely match venous glucose measurements in normoglycemic participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033205     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1325-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  27 in total

1.  Use of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to guide therapy in patients with insulin-treated diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert Tanenberg; Bruce Bode; Wendy Lane; Claresa Levetan; Jorge Mestman; Anne Peters Harmel; Janet Tobian; Todd Gross; John Mastrototaro
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Continuous glucose monitoring-guided insulin adjustment in children and adolescents on near-physiological insulin regimens: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kylie Yates; Abul Hasnat Milton; Keith Dear; Geoffrey Ambler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Why use the oral glucose tolerance test?

Authors:  R P Stolk; T J Orchard; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  William H Lagarde; Frank P Barrows; Marsha L Davenport; Minsun Kang; Harry A Guess; Ali S Calikoglu
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.866

5.  Multicenter study of oxygen-insensitive handheld glucose point-of-care testing in critical care/hospital/ambulatory patients in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  G J Kost; H T Vu; J H Lee; P Bourgeois; F L Kiechle; C Martin; S S Miller; A O Okorodudu; J J Podczasy; R Webster; K J Whitlow
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Strength and endurance training lead to different post exercise glucose profiles in diabetic participants using a continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  E Cauza; U Hanusch-Enserer; B Strasser; K Kostner; A Dunky; P Haber
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.686

7.  Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp.

Authors:  M Matsuda; R A DeFronzo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Postexercise insulin action in African-American women.

Authors:  Rebecca E Hasson; Patty S Freedson; Barry Braun
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Insulin action does not change during the menstrual cycle in normal women.

Authors:  E L Toth; A Suthijumroon; P M Crockford; E A Ryan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Counter-regulatory response to hypoglycemia in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  M P Diamond; D A Grainger; G Rossi; M Connolly-Diamond; R S Sherwin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  2 in total

1.  Glycaemic control is improved by 7 days of aerobic exercise training in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  C R Mikus; D J Oberlin; J Libla; L J Boyle; J P Thyfault
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Lowering physical activity impairs glycemic control in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Catherine R Mikus; Douglas J Oberlin; Jessica L Libla; Angelina M Taylor; Frank W Booth; John P Thyfault
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.