Literature DB >> 20031817

Statin cost-effectiveness in the United States for people at different vascular risk levels.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statins reduce the rates of heart attacks, strokes, and revascularization procedures (ie, major vascular events) in a wide range of circumstances. Randomized controlled trial data from 20,536 adults have been used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of prescribing statin therapy in the United States for people at different levels of vascular disease risk and to explore whether wider use of generic statins beyond the populations currently recommended for treatment in clinical guidelines is indicated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Randomized controlled trial data, an internally validated vascular disease model, and US costs of statin therapy and other medical care were used to project lifetime risks of vascular events and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 40 mg simvastatin daily. For an average of 5 years, allocation to simvastatin reduced the estimated US costs of hospitalizations for vascular events by approximately 20% (95% CI, 15 to 24) in the different subcategories of participants studied. At a daily cost of $1 for 40 mg generic simvastatin, the estimated costs of preventing a vascular death within the 5-year study period ranged from a net saving of $1300 (95% CI, $15,600 saving to $13,200 cost) among participants with a 42% 5-year major vascular event risk to a net cost of $216,500 ($123,700 to $460,000 cost) among those with a 12% 5-year risk. The costs per life year gained with lifetime simvastatin treatment ranged from $2500 (-$40 to $3820) in people aged 40 to 49 years with a 42% 5-year major vascular event risk to $10,990 ($9430 to $14,700) in people aged 70 years and older with a 12% 5-year risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with generic simvastatin appears to be cost-effective for a much wider population in the United States than that recommended by current guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20031817     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.808469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  20 in total

Review 1.  The role of C-reactive protein as a risk predictor of coronary atherosclerosis: implications from the JUPITER trial.

Authors:  Thura T Abd; Danny J Eapen; Ambareesh Bajpai; Abhinav Goyal; Allen Dollar; Laurence Sperling
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Economic utility of a blood-based genomic test for the assessment of patients with symptoms suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Louis I Hochheiser; Jessie L Juusola; Mark Monane; Joseph A Ladapo
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 3.  Adding a life-course perspective to cardiovascular-risk communication.

Authors:  Kunal N Karmali; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Pharmacologic regimens for knee osteoarthritis prevention: can they be cost-effective?

Authors:  E Losina; S A Burbine; L G Suter; D J Hunter; D H Solomon; M E Daigle; E E Dervan; J M Jordan; J N Katz
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 5.  Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integration of new data, evolving views, revised goals, and role of rosuvastatin in management. A comprehensive survey.

Authors:  Richard Kones
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Judy L Bezanson; Rowena J Dolor; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; L Kristin Newby; Ileana L Piña; Véronique L Roger; Leslee J Shaw; Dong Zhao; Theresa M Beckie; Cheryl Bushnell; Jeanine D'Armiento; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Jing Fang; Theodore G Ganiats; Antoinette S Gomes; Clarisa R Gracia; Constance K Haan; Elizabeth A Jackson; Debra R Judelson; Ellie Kelepouris; Carl J Lavie; Anne Moore; Nancy A Nussmeier; Elizabeth Ofili; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Vivian W Pinn; Katherine Sherif; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Elaine M Urbina; Viola Vaccarino; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Fiona Taylor; Mark D Huffman; Ana Filipa Macedo; Theresa H M Moore; Margaret Burke; George Davey Smith; Kirsten Ward; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

8.  Who needs laboratories and who needs statins?: comparative and cost-effectiveness analyses of non-laboratory-based, laboratory-based, and staged primary cardiovascular disease screening guidelines.

Authors:  Ankur Pandya; Milton C Weinstein; Joshua A Salomon; David Cutler; Thomas A Gaziano
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-01-14

Review 9.  A look at statin cost-effectiveness in view of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol management guidelines.

Authors:  Roderick C Deaño; Ankur Pandya; Erica C Jones; William B Borden
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  Practical Implementation of the 2013 AHA/ACC Blood Cholesterol Guidelines.

Authors:  John Dinkler; Karol Watson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.