Literature DB >> 20031712

Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.

William A Gray1, Seemant Chaturvedi, Patrick Verta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association has established guidelines for acceptable 30-day death and stroke rates for patients with severe carotid disease undergoing standard-risk carotid endarterectomy: <3% for asymptomatic lesions and <6% for symptomatic lesions. To date, carotid artery stenting has not demonstrated these outcomes in multicenter, prospective assessments of high-surgical-risk patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data from 2 prospective, multicenter (280 US sites, 672 operators), postmarket surveillance studies in high-surgical-risk patients were analyzed: 2145 patients from the Emboshield and Xact Post Approval Carotid Stent Trial (EX) and 4175 patients from the Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (C2). Both studies had pre- and postprocedure neurological evaluation and independent adjudication of neurological events. The overall 30-day death and stroke rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.0%) for EX and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.0%) for C2. In the population comparable with American Heart Association guidelines (<80 years), the combined 30-day death and stroke rate was 5.3% (95% CI, 3.6% to 7.4%) for symptomatic patients and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.4% to 3.4%) for asymptomatic patients, independent of unfavorable risk factors (anatomic or physiologic); in patients >/=80 years, this rate was 10.5% (95% CI, 6.3% to 16.0%) and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.7%), respectively. In subjects with anatomic features unfavorable for surgery, the 30-day death and stroke rates were 1.7% (95% CI, 0.0% to 8.9%) and 2.7% (95% CI, 1.3% to 4.9%) for symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts, respectively, independent of age.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for carotid artery stenting in nonoctogenarian high-surgical-risk patients have improved since the pivotal Food and Drug Administration approval trials, and have achieved American Heart Association standards in both symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20031712     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  15 in total

1.  Carotid artery stenting with distal filter protection: single-center experience in high-surgical-risk patients.

Authors:  Rainer Knur
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.

Authors:  Stephan Staubach; Ralph Hein-Rothweiler; Matthias Hochadel; Manuela Segerer; Ralf Zahn; Jens Jung; Gotthard Riess; Hubert Seggewiss; Andre Schneider; Thomas Fürste; Christian Gottkehaskamp; Harald Mudra
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Optimal treatment of extracranial carotid artery disease: carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, or optimal medical therapy.

Authors:  R Kevin Rogers; Kalkidan Bishu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Clinical significance and technical assessment of stent cell geometry in carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Ender A Finol; Mark H Wholey
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 5.  State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.

Authors:  Rajan A G Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Pascal Meier; Guido Knapp; Umesh Tamhane; Seemant Chaturvedi; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-12

7.  Stroke prevention: carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J White
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-03-25

8.  [Heart or brain? Problem patients at the interface between cardiology and neurology].

Authors:  K Gröschel; J Röther; U Laufs; R Wachter
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 9.  The urgent need for contemporary clinical trials in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Seemant Chaturvedi; Marc Chimowitz; Robert D Brown; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Recommendations for management of patients with carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Arijana Lovrencic-Huzjan; Tatjana Rundek; Michael Katsnelson
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.