Literature DB >> 20031704

A randomized controlled trial of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-directed bare-metal coronary stent placement (the AVID Trial).

Robert J Russo1, Patricia D Silva, Paul S Teirstein, Michael J Attubato, Charles J Davidson, Anthony C DeFranco, Peter J Fitzgerald, Steven L Goldberg, James B Hermiller, Martin B Leon, Frederick S Ling, Jennifer E Lucisano, Richard A Schatz, S Chiu Wong, Neil J Weissman, David M Zientek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AVID (Angiography Versus Intravascular ultrasound-Directed stent placement) is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess the effect of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-directed stent placement on the 12-month rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: After elective coronary stent placement and an optimal angiographic result (<10% stenosis), 800 patients were randomized to Angiography- or IVUS-directed therapy. Blinded IVUS was performed in the Angiography group without further therapy. In the IVUS group, IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement (<10% area stenosis, apposition, and absence of dissection) were applied. Final minimum stent area was 6.90+/-2.43 mm(2) in the Angiography group and 7.55+/-2.82 mm(2) in the IVUS group (P=0.001). In the IVUS group, only 37% with inadequate expansion (<90%) received further therapy. The 12-month TLR rate was 12.0% in the Angiography group and 8.1% in the IVUS group (P=0.08, 95% confidence level [CI], [-8.3% to 0.5%]). When vessels with a distal reference diameter <2.5 mm by core laboratory angiography measurement were excluded from analysis, the 12-month TLR rate was 10.1% in the Angiography group and 4.3% in the IVUS group (P=0.01, 95% CI, [-10.6% to -1.2%]). With a pre-stent angiographic stenosis of > or =70%, the TLR rate was lower in the IVUS group compared with the Angiography group (3.1% versus 14.2%; P=0.002; 95% CI, [-18.4% to -4.2%]).
CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement results in larger acute stent dimensions without an increase in complications and a significantly lower 12-month TLR rate for vessels > or =2.5 mm by angiography and for vessels with high-grade pre-stent stenosis. However, for the entire sample analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement does not significantly reduce the 12-month TLR rate when compared with stent placement guided by angiography alone. In addition, IVUS evaluation of adequate stent expansion is underutilized by experienced operators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20031704     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.778647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  22 in total

1.  One-year optical coherence tomography findings in patients with late and very-late stent thrombosis treated with intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Marcos Ñato; Josep Gomez-Lara; Rafael Romaguera; Gerard Roura; José Luis Ferreiro; Luis Teruel; Montserrat Gracida; Lara Fuentes; Bert Vandeloo; Joan-Antoni Gomez-Hospital; Angel Cequier
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Causes, assessment, and treatment of stent thrombosis--intravascular imaging insights.

Authors:  Daniel S Ong; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Optical coherence tomography- vs. intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Lorenz Räber; Yasushi Ueki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Intra-coronary imaging modalities.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Jigar Patel; Michael Yeung; Prashant Kaul
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-05

Review 5.  The Role of Intracoronary Plaque Imaging with Intravascular Ultrasound, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Vu Hoang; Jill Grounds; Don Pham; Salim Virani; Ihab Hamzeh; Athar Mahmood Qureshi; Nasser Lakkis; Mahboob Alam
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Compliance charts to guide non-complex small artery stenting: validation by quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; J Kimberly Haladyn; Debbie M Smith; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-05-31

7.  Overaggressive stent expansion without intravascular imaging: impact on restenosis.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; Richard Chan; J Kimberly Haladyn; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-02-27

8.  Is intravascular ultrasound beneficial for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions? Evidence from a 4,314-patient registry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Imad Sheiban; Enrico Romagnoli; Stefano De Servi; Corrado Tamburino; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Burzotta; Patrizia Presbitero; Leonardo Bolognese; Leonardo Paloscia; Paolo Rubino; Gennaro Sardella; Carlo Briguori; Luigi Niccoli; Gianfranco Franco; Domenico Di Girolamo; Luigi Piatti; Cesare Greco; Davide Capodanno; Giuseppe Sangiorgi
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 9.  Restenosis after PCI. Part 1: pathophysiology and risk factors.

Authors:  J Wouter Jukema; Jeffrey J W Verschuren; Tarek A N Ahmed; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  IVUS-Guided Stent Implantation to Improve Outcome: A Promise Waiting to be Fulfilled.

Authors:  Renata Rogacka; Azeem Latib; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.