BACKGROUND: The gene encoding the target of calcium channel blockers, the alpha1c-subunit of the L-type calcium channel (CACNA1C), has not been well characterized, and only small pharmacogenetic studies testing this gene have been published to date. METHODS AND RESULTS: Resequencing of CACNA1C was performed followed by a nested case-control study of the INternational VErapamil SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST) GENEtic Substudy (INVEST-GENES). Of 46 polymorphisms identified, 8 were assessed in the INVEST-GENES. Rs1051375 was found to have a significant interaction with treatment strategy (P=0.0001). Rs1051375 A/A genotype was associated with a 46% reduction in the primary outcome among those randomized to verapamil SR treatment, when compared with atenolol treatment (odds ratio 0.54 95% CI 0.32 to 0.92). In heterozygous A/G individuals, there was no difference in the occurrence of the primary outcome when randomized to verapamil SR versus atenolol treatment (odds ratio 1.47 95% CI 0.86 to 2.53), whereas homozygous G/G individuals had a greater than 4-fold increased risk of the primary outcome with verapamil treatment compared with those randomized to atenolol treatment (odds ratio 4.59 95% CI 1.67 to 12.67). We did not identify allelic expression imbalance or differences in mRNA expression in heart tissue by rs1051375 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in CACNA1C is associated with treatment response among hypertensive patients with stable coronary artery disease. Our data suggest a genetically defined group of patients that benefit most from calcium channel blocker therapy, a group that benefits most from beta-blocker therapy, and a third group in which calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker therapy are equivalent.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The gene encoding the target of calcium channel blockers, the alpha1c-subunit of the L-type calcium channel (CACNA1C), has not been well characterized, and only small pharmacogenetic studies testing this gene have been published to date. METHODS AND RESULTS: Resequencing of CACNA1C was performed followed by a nested case-control study of the INternational VErapamil SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST) GENEtic Substudy (INVEST-GENES). Of 46 polymorphisms identified, 8 were assessed in the INVEST-GENES. Rs1051375 was found to have a significant interaction with treatment strategy (P=0.0001). Rs1051375 A/A genotype was associated with a 46% reduction in the primary outcome among those randomized to verapamil SR treatment, when compared with atenolol treatment (odds ratio 0.54 95% CI 0.32 to 0.92). In heterozygous A/G individuals, there was no difference in the occurrence of the primary outcome when randomized to verapamil SR versus atenolol treatment (odds ratio 1.47 95% CI 0.86 to 2.53), whereas homozygous G/G individuals had a greater than 4-fold increased risk of the primary outcome with verapamil treatment compared with those randomized to atenolol treatment (odds ratio 4.59 95% CI 1.67 to 12.67). We did not identify allelic expression imbalance or differences in mRNA expression in heart tissue by rs1051375 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in CACNA1C is associated with treatment response among hypertensivepatients with stable coronary artery disease. Our data suggest a genetically defined group of patients that benefit most from calcium channel blocker therapy, a group that benefits most from beta-blocker therapy, and a third group in which calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker therapy are equivalent.
Authors: Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Liang Wang; Julie M Cunningham; Stephen N Thibodeau Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty; Jung Mi Oh; In-Wha Kim; Zuben E Sauna; Anna Maria Calcagno; Suresh V Ambudkar; Michael M Gottesman Journal: Science Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Danxin Wang; Audrey C Papp; Philip F Binkley; Julie A Johnson; Wolfgang Sadée Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Carl J Pepine; Eileen M Handberg; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Ronald G Marks; Peter Kowey; Franz H Messerli; Giuseppe Mancia; José L Cangiano; David Garcia-Barreto; Matyas Keltai; Serap Erdine; Heather A Bristol; H Robert Kolb; George L Bakris; Jerome D Cohen; William W Parmley Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-12-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M A Pacanowski; Y Gong; R M Cooper-Dehoff; N J Schork; M D Shriver; T Y Langaee; C J Pepine; J A Johnson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Amber L Beitelshees; Yan Gong; Danxin Wang; Nicholas J Schork; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff; Taimour Y Langaee; Mark D Shriver; Wolfgang Sadee; Harm J Knot; Carl J Pepine; Julie A Johnson Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Tobias Gerhard; Yan Gong; Amber L Beitelshees; Xianyun Mao; Maximilian T Lobmeyer; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Taimour Y Langaee; Nicholas J Schork; Mark D Shriver; Carl J Pepine; Julie A Johnson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Elvin Tyrone Price; Michael A Pacanowski; Michael A Martin; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Carl J Pepine; Issam Zineh; Julie A Johnson Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: J A Johnson; L H Cavallari; A L Beitelshees; J P Lewis; A R Shuldiner; D M Roden Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Chi Keung Lam; Lei Tian; Nadjet Belbachir; Alexa Wnorowski; Rajani Shrestha; Ning Ma; Tomoya Kitani; June-Wha Rhee; Joseph C Wu Journal: Circ Res Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Jason T Davis; Fangwen Rao; Dalal Naqshbandi; Maple M Fung; Kuixing Zhang; Andrew J Schork; Caroline M Nievergelt; Michael G Ziegler; Daniel T O'Connor Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Min Young Baek; Han Sung Hwang; Jin Young Park; Jee Eun Chung; Kyung Eun Lee; Gwan Yung Lee; Jin Won Seong; Jeong Yee; Young Ju Kim; Hye Sun Gwak Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Dan M Roden; Julie A Johnson; Stephen E Kimmel; Ronald M Krauss; Marisa Wong Medina; Alan Shuldiner; Russell A Wilke Journal: Circ Res Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 17.367