Literature DB >> 20029253

Mortality associated with implantation and management of intrathecal opioid drug infusion systems to treat noncancer pain.

Robert J Coffey1, Mary L Owens, Steven K Broste, Michel Y Dubois, F Michael Ferrante, David M Schultz, Lisa J Stearns, Michael S Turner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the authors observed a cluster of three deaths, which circumstances suggested were opioid-related, within 1 day after placement of intrathecal opioid pumps for noncancer pain. Further investigation suggested that mortality among such patients was higher than previously appreciated. The authors performed investigations to quantify that mortality and compare the results to control populations, including spinal cord stimulation and low back surgery.
METHODS: After analyzing nine index cases--three sentinel cases and six identified by a prospective strategy--the authors used epidemiological methods to investigate whether mortality rates reflected patient- or therapy-related differences. Mortality rates after intrathecal opioid therapy and spinal cord stimulation were derived by correlating Medtronic device registration data with de-identified data from the Social Security Death Master File. Aggregate demographic and comorbidity data were obtained from Medicare and United Healthcare population databases to examine the influence of demographics and comorbidities on mortality.
RESULTS: Device registration and Social Security analyses revealed an intrathecal opioid therapy mortality rate of 0.088% at 3 days after implantation, 0.39% at 1 month, and 3.89% at 1 yr-a higher mortality than after spinal cord stimulation implants or after lumbar diskectomy in community hospitals. Demographic, illness profile, and mortality analyses of large databases suggest, despite limitations, that excess mortality was related to intrathecal opioid therapy, and could not be fully explained by other factors. These findings were consistent with the nine index cases that revealed that respiratory arrest caused or contributed to death in all patients. No device malfunctions associated with overinfusion were identified among cases where data were available.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with noncancer pain treated with intrathecal opioid therapy experience increased mortality compared to similar patients treated by using other therapies. Respiratory depression as a consequence of intrathecal drug overdosage or mixed intrathecal and systemic drug interactions is one plausible, but hypothetical mechanism. The exact causes for patient deaths and the proportion of those deaths attributable to intrathecal opioid therapy remain to be determined. These findings, although based on incomplete information, suggest that it may be possible to reduce mortality in noncancer intrathecal opioid therapy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20029253     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b64ab8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

Review 1.  Intrathecal therapy for chronic pain: current trends and future needs.

Authors:  Salim M Hayek; Michael C Hanes
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-01

Review 2.  History and present state of targeted intrathecal drug delivery.

Authors:  Syed Rizvi; Krishna Kumar
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Intrathecal drug delivery for chronic pain management-scope, limitations and future.

Authors:  M Czernicki; G Sinovich; I Mihaylov; B Nejad; S Kunnumpurath; G Kodumudi; N Vadivelu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Intrathecal drug delivery for the management of pain and spasticity in adults: an executive summary of the British Pain Society's recommendations for best clinical practice.

Authors:  Rui Duarte; Jon Raphael; Sam Eldabe
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2015-05-27

Review 5.  Interventional management for cancer pain.

Authors:  Doris K Cope; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-08

Review 6.  Current perspectives on intrathecal drug delivery.

Authors:  Michael M Bottros; Paul J Christo
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Treatment of Refractory Postdural Puncture Headache after Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Implantation with Epidural Blood Patch Procedures: A 20-Year Experience.

Authors:  Markus A Bendel; Susan M Moeschler; Wenchun Qu; Eugerie Hanley; Stephanie A Neuman; Jason S Eldrige; Bryan C Hoelzer
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-11

Review 8.  The Proteomics of Intrathecal Analgesic agents for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  David M Moore; Connail McCrory
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 7.363

Review 9.  Intrathecal Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Review of Morphine and Ziconotide as Firstline Options.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Jason E Pope; Michael C Hanes; Gladstone C McDowell
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Targeted Drug Delivery for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: Longitudinal Data From the Product Surveillance Registry.

Authors:  David M Schultz; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Aaron Calodney; Katherine Stromberg; Todd Weaver; Robert J Spencer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-01-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.