Literature DB >> 20024582

Can renal oncocytoma be distinguished from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma by the presence of fibrous capsule?

Alma Demirović1, Sanja Cesarec, Borislav Spajić, Davor Tomas, Stela Bulimbasić, Milan Milosević, Zlatko Marusić, Bozo Kruslin.   

Abstract

The most important differential diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) is renal oncocytoma. Due to overlapping morphological characteristics of renal oncocytoma and CRCC, particularly its eosinophilic variant, making a correct diagnosis can be challenging. To date, no data are available on the presence of the tumor fibrous capsule as a diagnostic feature in differentiating these tumors. The main purpose of this study was to establish the presence and compare the thickness of the tumor fibrous capsule between two tumor groups. A total of 37 tumors--18 cases of CRCC (three eosinophilic and 15 classic) and 19 cases of renal oncocytoma--were analyzed. Four slides of each tumor stained with hematoxylin and eosin were first scanned at low-power magnification (x40) to assess the presence of the capsule. If present, the capsule was measured in three different thickest areas at higher magnification (x200). The mean value of capsule thickness was calculated and taken into consideration. The capsule was present in 12 (66.7%) cases of CRCCs and in only two (10.5%) cases of renal oncocytomas. Statistical analysis showed significant difference between the presence of fibrous capsule in these two observed tumor groups (P = 0.001). Average thickness of capsule in CRCCs was 337.7 microm, and 115.4 microm in renal oncocytomas, but the median was not statistically significant (P = 0.198). Studies with a larger number of cases are needed to conclude if this characteristic could be a low-cost, reliable microscopic feature in differentiating between CRCC and renal oncocytoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024582     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-009-0868-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of fine-needle aspiration cytology for renal masses.

Authors:  R D Brierly; P J Thomas; N W Harrison; M S Fletcher; J D Nawrocki; M Ashton-Key
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Can renal oncocytoma be differentiated from its renal mimics? The utility of anti-mitochondrial, caveolin 1, CD63 and cytokeratin 14 antibodies in the differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Ozgur Mete; Isin Kilicaslan; Mine G Gulluoglu; Veli Uysal
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Can renal oncocytomas be distinguished from renal cell carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens? A study of conventional smears in conjunction with ancillary studies.

Authors:  J Liu; C V Fanning
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-12-25       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma: comparison of cytomorphologic features.

Authors:  B A Wiatrowska; M F Zakowski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Advances and controversies in grading and staging of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brett Delahunt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas have similar frequent losses of multiple chromosomes from among chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17, and this pattern of genetic abnormality is not present in renal oncocytoma.

Authors:  Matteo Brunelli; John N Eble; Shaobo Zhang; Guido Martignoni; Brett Delahunt; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Renal oncocytoma: CT features cannot reliably distinguish oncocytoma from other renal neoplasms.

Authors:  S Choudhary; A Rajesh; N J Mayer; K A Mulcahy; A Haroon
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Immunohistochemical analysis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, renal oncocytoma, and clear cell carcinoma: an optimal and practical panel for differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Lina Liu; Junqi Qian; Harpreet Singh; Isabelle Meiers; Xiaoge Zhou; David G Bostwick
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Nuclear morphometry in differential diagnosis of renal oncocytoma and renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J P Castrén; T Kuopio; M J Nurmi; Y U Collan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  2 in total

1.  A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with a central scar-matched study.

Authors:  Xiaoli Li; Qianli Ma; Pei Nie; Yingmei Zheng; Cheng Dong; Wenjian Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  TGF-β1 expression in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma.

Authors:  A Demirović; S Cesarec; Z Marušić; D Tomas; M Milošević; T Hudolin; B Krušlin
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.188

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.