Literature DB >> 15467713

Eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas have similar frequent losses of multiple chromosomes from among chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17, and this pattern of genetic abnormality is not present in renal oncocytoma.

Matteo Brunelli1, John N Eble, Shaobo Zhang, Guido Martignoni, Brett Delahunt, Liang Cheng.   

Abstract

That chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has an uncommon eosinophilic variant has been recognized for more than a decade. In sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma are similar in appearance. While it is well established that chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma have different patterns of genetic anomalies, little is known of the genetics of the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. This study was undertaken to elucidate the genetic lesions of eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and to compare them with those found in classic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and in renal oncocytoma. A total of 29 renal neoplasms--nine eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 10 classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, and 10 oncocytomas--were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization on 5 microm paraffin-embedded tissue sections with centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17. Signals were counted in 100-200 neoplastic nuclei from each tumor. Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas frequently showed loss of chromosomes 1 (70% of classic, 67% of eosinophilic), 2 (90% classic, 56% eosinophilic), 6 (80% classic, 56% eosinophilic), 10 (60% classic, 44% eosinophilic), and 17 (90% classic, 78% eosinophilic); Among the classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, only one had no loss of any of the chromosomes, while 50% had loss of all five chromosomes. Among the eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, one of nine had no loss and 44% had loss of all five chromosomes. One oncocytoma had loss of chromosome 1. No other chromosomal loss was detected in the oncocytomas. In conclusion, losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17 are frequent in both eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Loss of chromosome 1 occurs occasionally in oncocytoma but losses of chromosomes 2, 6, 10, and 17 are not found in oncocytomas. When the differential diagnostic problem is oncocytoma vs eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, detection of losses of chromosomes 2, 6, 10, or 17 effectively excludes the diagnosis of oncocytoma and supports the diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15467713     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  36 in total

1.  The somatic genomic landscape of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Caleb F Davis; Christopher J Ricketts; Min Wang; Lixing Yang; Andrew D Cherniack; Hui Shen; Christian Buhay; Hyojin Kang; Sang Cheol Kim; Catherine C Fahey; Kathryn E Hacker; Gyan Bhanot; Dmitry A Gordenin; Andy Chu; Preethi H Gunaratne; Michael Biehl; Sahil Seth; Benny A Kaipparettu; Christopher A Bristow; Lawrence A Donehower; Eric M Wallen; Angela B Smith; Satish K Tickoo; Pheroze Tamboli; Victor Reuter; Laura S Schmidt; James J Hsieh; Toni K Choueiri; A Ari Hakimi; Lynda Chin; Matthew Meyerson; Raju Kucherlapati; Woong-Yang Park; A Gordon Robertson; Peter W Laird; Elizabeth P Henske; David J Kwiatkowski; Peter J Park; Margaret Morgan; Brian Shuch; Donna Muzny; David A Wheeler; W Marston Linehan; Richard A Gibbs; W Kimryn Rathmell; Chad J Creighton
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 2.  Renal cell carcinoma deep sequencing: recent developments.

Authors:  Leslie J Farber; Kyle Furge; Bin Tean Teh
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Morphological, immunohistochemical, and chromosomal analysis of multicystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, an architecturally unusual challenging variant.

Authors:  Maria Pané Foix; Ana Dunatov; Petr Martinek; Enric Condom Mundó; Saul Suster; Maris Sperga; Jose I Lopez; Monika Ulamec; Stela Bulimbasic; Delia Perez Montiel; Reza Alaghehbandan; Kvetoslava Peckova; Krystina Pivovarcikova; Daum Ondrej; Pavla Rotterova; Faruk Skenderi; Kristyna Prochazkova; Martin Dusek; Milan Hora; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Genomic and metabolic characterization of a chromophobe renal cell carcinoma cell line model (UOK276).

Authors:  Youfeng Yang; Cathy D Vocke; Christopher J Ricketts; Darmood Wei; Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Martin Lang; Carole Sourbier; J Keith Killian; Shawna L Boyle; Robert Worrell; Paul S Meltzer; Thomas Ried; Maria J Merino; Adam R Metwalli; W Marston Linehan
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Diagnostic pitfall on the histological spectrum of adult-onset renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions.

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Kazunobu Katto; Yukichi Tanaka; Tadanori Yamaguchi; Kaori Inoue; Masahiko Ohara; Keiko Mizuno; Ondrej Hes; Michal Michal; Gang-Hong Lee
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with prominent lymph node metastasis and polysomy of chromosome 21: poorly differentiated form or "presarcomatoid" form?

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Masato Tamura; Ondrej Hes; Michal Michal; Taro Shuin; Makoto Toi; Yoshihiro Hayashi; Gang-Hong Lee
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Renal oncocytoma: a comparative clinicopathologic study and fluorescent in-situ hybridization analysis of 73 cases with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Marie Dvorakova; Rajiv Dhir; Sheldon I Bastacky; Kathleen M Cieply; Marie B Acquafondata; Carol R Sherer; Tracy L Mercuri; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  High fidelity of driver chromosomal alterations among primary and metastatic renal cell carcinomas: implications for tumor clonal evolution and treatment.

Authors:  Eril J Kouba; John N Eble; Novae Simper; David J Grignon; Mingsheng Wang; Shaobo Zhang; Lisha Wang; Guido Martignoni; Sean R Williamson; Matteo Brunelli; Claudio Luchini; Anna Calió; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytic variant: a proposal of a new variant giving a critical diagnostic pitfall in diagnosing renal oncocytic tumors.

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Azusa Tanaka; Tadanori Yamaguchi; Kotaro Kasahara; Keishi Naruse; Yosuke Yamada; Kanako Hatanaka; Nobuo Shinohara; Yoji Nagashima; Shuji Mikami; Mototsugu Oya; Takeru Hamashima; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  High-resolution DNA copy number and gene expression analyses distinguish chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas.

Authors:  Maria V Yusenko; Roland P Kuiper; Tamas Boethe; Börje Ljungberg; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Gyula Kovacs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.