Literature DB >> 20024018

Fate of organohalogens in US wastewater treatment plants and estimated chemical releases to soils nationwide from biosolids recycling.

Jochen Heidler1, Rolf U Halden.   

Abstract

This study examined the occurrence in wastewater of 11 aromatic biocides, pesticides and degradates, and their fate during passage through US treatment plants, as well as the chemical mass contained in sewage sludge (biosolids) destined for land application. Analyte concentrations in wastewater influent, effluent and sludge from 25 facilities in 18 US states were determined by liquid chromatography electrospray (tandem) mass spectrometry. Dichlorocarbanilide, fipronil, triclocarban, and triclosan were found consistently in all sample types. Dichlorophene, hexachlorophene, and tetrachlorocarbanilide were detected infrequently only, and concentrations of the phenyl urea pesticides diflubenzuron, hexaflumuron, and linuron were below the limit of detection in all matrixes. Median concentrations (+/-95% confidence interval) of quantifiable compounds in influent ranged from 4.2 +/- 0.8 microg L(-1) for triclocarban to 0.03 +/- 0.01 microg L(-1) for fipronil. Median concentrations in effluent were highest for triclocarban and triclosan (0.23 +/- 0.08 and 0.07 +/- 0.04 microg L(-1), respectively). Median aqueous-phase removal efficiencies (+/-95% CI) of activated sludge treatment plants decreased in the order of: triclosan (96 +/- 2%) > triclocarban (87 +/- 7%) > dichlorocarbanilide (55 +/- 20%) > fipronil (18 +/- 22%). Median concentrations of organohalogens were typically higher in anaerobically than in aerobically digested sludges, and peaked at 27 600 +/- 9600 and 15 800 +/- 8200 microg kg(-1) for triclocarban and triclosan, respectively. Mass balances obtained for three primary pesticides in six activated sludge treatment plants employing anaerobic digestion suggested a decreasing overall persistence from fipronil (97 +/- 70%) to triclocarban (87 +/- 29%) to triclosan (28 +/- 30%). Nationwide release of the investigated organohalogens to agricultural land via municipal sludge recycling and into surface waters is estimated to total 258 000 +/- 110 00 kg year(-1) (mean +/- 95% confidence interval), with most of this mass derived from antimicrobial consumer products of daily use. This study addresses some of the data gaps identified by the National Research Council in its 2002 study on standards and practices of biosolids application on land.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024018      PMCID: PMC2802102          DOI: 10.1039/b914324f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  32 in total

1.  Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  B K Matuszewski; M L Constanzer; C M Chavez-Eng
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Survey of organic wastewater contaminants in biosolids destined for land application.

Authors:  Chad A Kinney; Edward T Furlong; Steven D Zaugg; Mark R Burkhard; Stephen L Werner; Jeffery D Cahill; Gretchen R Jorgensen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  The bactericidal agent triclosan modulates thyroid hormone-associated gene expression and disrupts postembryonic anuran development.

Authors:  Nik Veldhoen; Rachel C Skirrow; Heather Osachoff; Heidi Wigmore; David J Clapson; Mark P Gunderson; Graham Van Aggelen; Caren C Helbing
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Compliance analysis of phenylurea and related compounds in drinking water by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry coupled with solid-phase extraction.

Authors:  Yongtao Li; John E George; Christina L McCarty; Steven C Wendelken
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 5.  Consumer antibacterial soaps: effective or just risky?

Authors:  Allison E Aiello; Elaine L Larson; Stuart B Levy
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Triclosan in wastewaters and biosolids from Australian wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Guang-Guo Ying; Rai S Kookana
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Identification of new human pregnane X receptor ligands among pesticides using a stable reporter cell system.

Authors:  Géraldine Lemaire; Wissem Mnif; Jean-Marc Pascussi; Arnaud Pillon; Fanja Rabenoelina; Hélène Fenet; Elena Gomez; Claude Casellas; Jean-Claude Nicolas; Vincent Cavaillès; Marie-Josèphe Duchesne; Patrick Balaguer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Mass balance assessment of triclosan removal during conventional sewage treatment.

Authors:  Jochen Heidler; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Detection of triclocarban and two co-contaminating chlorocarbanilides in US aquatic environments using isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amir Sapkota; Jochen Heidler; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Efficiency of conventional drinking-water-treatment processes in removal of pharmaceuticals and other organic compounds.

Authors:  Paul E Stackelberg; Jacob Gibs; Edward T Furlong; Michael T Meyer; Steven D Zaugg; R Lee Lippincott
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  16 in total

1.  Biomarkers of exposure to triclocarban in urine and serum.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Ye; Xiaoliu Zhou; Johnathan Furr; Ki Chang Ahn; Bruce D Hammock; Earl L Gray; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Identification of wastewater bacteria involved in the degradation of triclocarban and its non-chlorinated congener.

Authors:  Todd R Miller; David R Colquhoun; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Urinary Concentrations of the Antibacterial Agent Triclocarban in United States Residents: 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Ye; Lee-Yang Wong; Prabha Dwivedi; Xiaoliu Zhou; Tao Jia; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Retrospective nationwide occurrence of fipronil and its degradates in U.S. wastewater and sewage sludge from 2001 - 2016.

Authors:  Akash M Sadaria; Cameron W Labban; Joshua C Steele; Megan M Maurer; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Early life triclocarban exposure during lactation affects neonate rat survival.

Authors:  Rebekah C M Kennedy; Fu-Min Menn; Laura Healy; Kellie A Fecteau; Pan Hu; Jiyoung Bae; Nancy A Gee; Bill L Lasley; Ling Zhao; Jiangang Chen
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Triclosan comes under scrutiny.

Authors:  Catherine M Cooney
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Emerging and priority contaminants with endocrine active potentials in sediments and fish from the River Po (Italy).

Authors:  Viganò Luigi; Mascolo Giuseppe; Roscioli Claudio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Mass Balance of Fipronil and Total Toxicity of Fipronil-Related Compounds in Process Streams during Conventional Wastewater and Wetland Treatment.

Authors:  Samuel D Supowit; Akash M Sadaria; Edward J Reyes; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Human fetal exposure to triclosan and triclocarban in an urban population from Brooklyn, New York.

Authors:  Benny F G Pycke; Laura A Geer; Mudar Dalloul; Ovadia Abulafia; Alizee M Jenck; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.