OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between variants in the complement component 5 (C5) gene and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Separate and combined data from 3 large AMD case-control studies and a prospective population-based study (The Rotterdam Study). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2599 AMD cases and 3458 ethnically matched controls. METHODS: Fifteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning the C5 gene were initially genotyped in 375 cases and 199 controls from The Netherlands (The Amsterdam/Rotterdam-Netherlands [AMRO-NL] study population). Replication testing of selected SNPs was performed in the Rotterdam Study (NL) and study populations from Southampton, United Kingdom (UK), and New York, United States (US). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early and late stages of prevalent and incident AMD, graded according to (a modification of) the international grading and classification system of AMD. RESULTS: Significant allelic or genotypic associations between 8 C5 SNPs and AMD were found in the AMRO-NL study and this risk seemed to be independent of CFH Y402H, LOC387715 A69S, age, and gender. None of these findings could be confirmed consistently in 3 replication populations. CONCLUSIONS: Although the complement pathway, including C5, plays a crucial role in AMD, and the C5 protein is present in drusen, no consistent significant associations between C5 SNPs and AMD were found in any of these studies. The implications for genetic screening of AMD are discussed. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between variants in the complement component 5 (C5) gene and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Separate and combined data from 3 large AMD case-control studies and a prospective population-based study (The Rotterdam Study). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2599 AMD cases and 3458 ethnically matched controls. METHODS: Fifteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning the C5 gene were initially genotyped in 375 cases and 199 controls from The Netherlands (The Amsterdam/Rotterdam-Netherlands [AMRO-NL] study population). Replication testing of selected SNPs was performed in the Rotterdam Study (NL) and study populations from Southampton, United Kingdom (UK), and New York, United States (US). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early and late stages of prevalent and incident AMD, graded according to (a modification of) the international grading and classification system of AMD. RESULTS: Significant allelic or genotypic associations between 8 C5 SNPs and AMD were found in the AMRO-NL study and this risk seemed to be independent of CFHY402H, LOC387715 A69S, age, and gender. None of these findings could be confirmed consistently in 3 replication populations. CONCLUSIONS: Although the complement pathway, including C5, plays a crucial role in AMD, and the C5 protein is present in drusen, no consistent significant associations between C5 SNPs and AMD were found in any of these studies. The implications for genetic screening of AMD are discussed. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: G S Hageman; P J Luthert; N H Victor Chong; L V Johnson; D H Anderson; R F Mullins Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: John W Crabb; Masaru Miyagi; Xiaorong Gu; Karen Shadrach; Karen A West; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Motohiro Kamei; Azeem Hasan; Lin Yan; Mary E Rayborn; Robert G Salomon; Joe G Hollyfield Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-10-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrew Dewan; Mugen Liu; Stephen Hartman; Samuel Shao-Min Zhang; David T L Liu; Connie Zhao; Pancy O S Tam; Wai Man Chan; Dennis S C Lam; Michael Snyder; Colin Barnstable; Chi Pui Pang; Josephine Hoh Journal: Science Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Andrew J Lotery; Dominique Baas; Caroline Ridley; Richard P O Jones; Caroline C W Klaver; Edwin Stone; Tomoyuki Nakamura; Andrew Luff; Helen Griffiths; Tao Wang; Arthur A B Bergen; Dorothy Trump Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Salome Murinello; Robert F Mullins; Andrew J Lotery; V Hugh Perry; Jessica L Teeling Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Zohar Yehoshua; Carlos Alexandre de Amorim Garcia Filho; Renata Portella Nunes; Giovanni Gregori; Fernando M Penha; Andrew A Moshfeghi; Kang Zhang; Srinivas Sadda; William Feuer; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Dominique C Baas; Dominiek D Despriet; Theo G M F Gorgels; Julie Bergeron-Sawitzke; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Joanna E Merriam; R Theodore Smith; Gaetano R Barile; Jacoline B ten Brink; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Rando Allikmets; Michael Dean; Arthur A B Bergen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Todd E Scheetz; John H Fingert; Kai Wang; Markus H Kuehn; Kevin L Knudtson; Wallace L M Alward; H Culver Boldt; Stephen R Russell; James C Folk; Thomas L Casavant; Terry A Braun; Abbot F Clark; Edwin M Stone; Val C Sheffield Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240