Literature DB >> 20020908

Toxicity data informatics: supporting a new paradigm for toxicity prediction.

Ann M Richard1, Chihae Yang, Richard S Judson.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chemical toxicity data at all levels of description, from treatment-level dose response data to a high-level summarized toxicity "endpoint," effectively circumscribe, enable, and limit predictive toxicology approaches and capabilities. Several new and evolving public data initiatives focused on the world of chemical toxicity information-as represented here by ToxML (Toxicology XML standard), DSSTox (Distributed Structure-Searchable Toxicity Database Network), and ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource)-are contributing to the creation of a more unified, mineable, and modelable landscape of public toxicity data. These projects address different layers in the spectrum of toxicological data representation and detail and, additionally, span diverse domains of toxicology and chemistry in relation to industry and environmental regulatory concerns. For each of the three projects, data standards are the key to enabling "read-across" in relation to toxicity data and chemical-indexed information. In turn, "read-across" capability enables flexible data mining, as well as meaningful aggregation of lower levels of toxicity information to summarized, modelable endpoints spanning sufficient areas of chemical space for building predictive models. By means of shared data standards and transparent and flexible rules for data aggregation, these and related public data initiatives are effectively spanning the divides among experimental toxicologists, computational modelers, and the world of chemically indexed, publicly available toxicity information.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20020908     DOI: 10.1080/15376510701857452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods        ISSN: 1537-6516            Impact factor:   2.987


  10 in total

Review 1.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Collaborative development of predictive toxicology applications.

Authors:  Barry Hardy; Nicki Douglas; Christoph Helma; Micha Rautenberg; Nina Jeliazkova; Vedrin Jeliazkov; Ivelina Nikolova; Romualdo Benigni; Olga Tcheremenskaia; Stefan Kramer; Tobias Girschick; Fabian Buchwald; Joerg Wicker; Andreas Karwath; Martin Gütlein; Andreas Maunz; Haralambos Sarimveis; Georgia Melagraki; Antreas Afantitis; Pantelis Sopasakis; David Gallagher; Vladimir Poroikov; Dmitry Filimonov; Alexey Zakharov; Alexey Lagunin; Tatyana Gloriozova; Sergey Novikov; Natalia Skvortsova; Dmitry Druzhilovsky; Sunil Chawla; Indira Ghosh; Surajit Ray; Hitesh Patel; Sylvia Escher
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.514

3.  Providing the missing link: the exposure science ontology ExO.

Authors:  Carolyn J Mattingly; Thomas E McKone; Michael A Callahan; Judith A Blake; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Inroads to predict in vivo toxicology-an introduction to the eTOX Project.

Authors:  Katharine Briggs; Montserrat Cases; David J Heard; Manuel Pastor; François Pognan; Ferran Sanz; Christof H Schwab; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; Andreas Sutter; David K Watson; Jörg D Wichard
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  The eTOX data-sharing project to advance in silico drug-induced toxicity prediction.

Authors:  Montserrat Cases; Katharine Briggs; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; François Pognan; Philippe Marc; Thomas Kleinöder; Christof H Schwab; Manuel Pastor; Jörg Wichard; Ferran Sanz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA.

Authors:  Jon R Sobus; John F Wambaugh; Kristin K Isaacs; Antony J Williams; Andrew D McEachran; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; Elin M Ulrich; Julia E Rager; Mark J Strynar; Seth R Newton
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Exposure as part of a systems approach for assessing risk.

Authors:  Linda S Sheldon; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  The toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Ann Richard; David J Dix; Keith Houck; Matthew Martin; Robert Kavlock; Vicki Dellarco; Tala Henry; Todd Holderman; Philip Sayre; Shirlee Tan; Thomas Carpenter; Edwin Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity.

Authors:  Arwa B Raies; Vladimir B Bajic
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2016-01-06

10.  The integration of pharmacophore-based 3D QSAR modeling and virtual screening in safety profiling: A case study to identify antagonistic activities against adenosine receptor, A2A, using 1,897 known drugs.

Authors:  Fan Fan; Dora Toledo Warshaviak; Hisham K Hamadeh; Robert T Dunn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.