Literature DB >> 20020235

Fixation behavior in advanced stage glaucoma assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1.

Takanori Kameda1, Teruyo Tanabe2,3, Masanori Hangai1, Tomonari Ojima1, Hiroko Aikawa1, Nagahisa Yoshimura1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate fixation behavior in eyes with advanced glaucoma using the MicroPerimeter MP-1.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 39 glaucoma patients who had scotomas adjacent to fixation points. Using the MP-1, we examined the stability and location of fixation with the fixation test and the microperimetry test. We examined retinal sensitivity using the central 10-2 SITA standard programs of a Humphrey Field Analyzer and the macula 10 degrees program of the MP-1 and analyzed the correlation between fixation behavior and retinal sensitivity.
RESULTS: Of the 39 eyes, 37 showed "stable" fixation in the fixation test, while 30 eyes showed stable fixation in the microperimetry test. In the fixation test, 32 of 39 eyes demonstrated "predominantly central" fixation, whereas in the microperimetry test only 26 eyes exhibited the same fixation. Fixation stability correlated positively with sensitivity in the central 10 degrees diameter area (r=0.414, P=0.009). Among the six eyes showing "predominantly eccentric" fixation, the preferred retinal locus of five was in the superior or superotemporal direction from the fovea.
CONCLUSIONS: The MP-1 illustrated the fixation patterns in glaucomatous eyes and the fixation patterns correlated well with retinal sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20020235     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-009-0735-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  24 in total

1.  Reading with multiple preferred retinal loci: implications for training a more efficient reading strategy.

Authors:  A Déruaz; A R Whatham; C Mermoud; A B Safran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Fixation stability and macular light sensitivity in patients with diabetic maculopathy: a microperimetric study with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Thomas Kube; Stephanie Schmidt; Frank Toonen; Bernd Kirchhof; Sebastian Wolf
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Fixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. A microperimetry study.

Authors:  Edoardo Midena; Pietro Paolo Radin; Elisabetta Pilotto; Alessandra Ghirlando; Enrica Convento; Monica Varano
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.975

4.  Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.

Authors:  Christina Springer; Stefan Bültmann; Hans E Völcker; Klaus Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  How spatial orientation of Japanese text affects fixation points in patients with bilateral macular atrophy.

Authors:  Yoko Matsumoto; Mitsuko Yuzawa; Koichi Oda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Diabetic macular edema: correlation between microperimetry and optical coherence tomography findings.

Authors:  Stela Vujosevic; Edoardo Midena; Elisabetta Pilotto; Pietro P Radin; Laura Chiesa; Fabiano Cavarzeran
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease.

Authors:  Michael D Crossland; Louise E Culham; Stamatina A Kabanarou; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Scotoma and fixation patterns using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in patients with macular dystrophy.

Authors:  F Mori; S Ishiko; N Kitaya; A Takamiya; E Sato; T Hikichi; A Yoshida
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Functional assessment of macular hole surgery by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  J E Guez; J F Le Gargasson; P Massin; F Rigaudière; Y Grall; A Gaudric
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A microperimeter that provides fixation pattern and retinal sensitivity measurement.

Authors:  Miki Sawa; Fumi Gomi; Ayako Toyoda; Yasushi Ikuno; Takashi Fujikado; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.211

View more
  19 in total

1.  Use of microperimetry to compare macular light sensitivity in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Ping Huang; Yan Shi; Xin Wang; Samuel Shao-Min Zhang; Chun Zhang
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Microperimetry and optical coherence tomography imaging in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral focal ischaemic glaucoma.

Authors:  Imran H Yusuf; Jasleen K Jolly; Gokulan Ratnarajan; John F Salmon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction.

Authors:  Francesca Verboschi; Daniela Domanico; Marcella Nebbioso; Giulia Corradetti; Sergio Zaccaria Scalinci; Enzo Maria Vingolo
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  Understanding the role of microperimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  Luca Scuderi; Irene Gattazzo; Alessandro de Paula; Clemente Maria Iodice; Federico Di Tizio; Andrea Perdicchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.029

5.  Eye movements during visual search in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Nicholas D Smith; Fiona C Glen; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Compass: clinical evaluation of a new instrument for the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Authors:  Luca Rossetti; Maurizio Digiuni; Alberto Rosso; Roberta Riva; Giuliano Barbaro; Michael K Smolek; Nicola Orzalesi; Stefano De Cilla'; Alessandro Autelitano; Paolo Fogagnolo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Smaller Fixation Target Size Is Associated with More Stable Fixation and Less Variance in Threshold Sensitivity.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Kana Okano; Risako Koshiji; Wakana Funaki; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals.

Authors:  Tomohiro Nizawa; Takayuki Baba; Masayasu Kitahashi; Toshiyuki Oshitari; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-14

9.  Intersession test-retest variability of 10-2 MAIA microperimetry in fixation-threatening glaucoma.

Authors:  Evan N Wong; William H Morgan; Fred K Chen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-20

10.  Fascicular Visual Field Defects in Open-Angle Glaucoma: Evaluation with Microperimetry.

Authors:  Loredana Arrico; Rossella Giannotti; Manuela Fratipietro; Romualdo Malagola
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.