Literature DB >> 20019969

Changes in health utilities and health-related quality of life over 12 months following radical prostatectomy.

Jennifer Ku1, Murray Krahn, John Trachtenberg, Michael Nesbitt, Robin Kalnin, Gina Lockwood, Shabbir M H Alibhai.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although radical prostatectomy (RP) is an effective treatment for prostate cancer, it has potentially deleterious effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Utility is an important global measure of HRQoL. This utility is also used in decision-making models and economic evaluations. There are no published prospective data characterizing men's utilities for health outcomes post-RP.
METHODS: From July 2003 to June 2006, patients undergoing RP at the University Health Network in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, completed the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS), a disease-specific HRQoL and utility instrument. Men were included if they had clinically localized prostate cancer and had completed HRQoL measures prior to surgery and at least once within 9 to 18 months after the RP. Health-related quality of life was measured prior to surgery and at 4 stages after surgery: 0 to 3 months, 3 to 9 months, 9 to 18 months, and 18 to 30 months. Statistical analyses included pairwise t-tests and multivariable linear regression comparing changes in scores between baseline and the 9- to 18-month range.
RESULTS: Two hundred and thirteen men (mean age 60.9, median Gleason score 7) met the inclusion criteria. At baseline, HRQoL was high (mean PORPUS-P [psychometric] = 83.8). Scores declined sharply by 3 months (65.5, p < 0.001) and improved but did not reach baseline by 9-18 months (75.1, p < 0.001). Utility scores (PORPUS-U[utility]) showed the same pattern: 0.94 at baseline; 0.81 at 3 months (p < 0.001); and 0.88 at 9 to 18 months (p < 0.001). Predictors of HRQoL, including baseline PORPUS score, nerve-sparing surgery and smoking status, decline after RP.
CONCLUSION: Symptom scores are known to be affected up to 12 months after RP. Our study demonstrates that global health status also declines and remains affected 1 year after surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20019969      PMCID: PMC2792418          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  32 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Rosen; J C Cappelleri; M D Smith; J Lipsky; B M Peña
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  John T Wei; Rodney L Dunn; Howard M Sandler; P William McLaughlin; James E Montie; Mark S Litwin; Linda Nyquist; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Quality-of-life outcomes for men with prostate carcinoma detected by screening.

Authors:  D S Smith; G F Carvalhal; K Schneider; J Krygiel; Y Yan; W J Catalona
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  M S Litwin; G Y Melmed; T Nakazon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Effect of radical retropubic prostatectomy on erectile function, evaluated before and after surgery using colour Doppler ultrasonography and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring.

Authors:  Y Kawanishi; K S Lee; K Kimura; K Kojima; A Yamamoto; A Numata
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Construction of the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS): a multiattribute health state classification system for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Krahn; P Ritvo; J Irvine; G Tomlinson; A Bezjak; J Trachtenberg; G Naglie
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Do older men benefit from curative therapy of localized prostate cancer?

Authors:  Shabbir M H Alibhai; Gary Naglie; Robert Nam; John Trachtenberg; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Patient and community preferences for outcomes in prostate cancer: implications for clinical policy.

Authors:  Murray Krahn; Paul Ritvo; Jane Irvine; George Tomlinson; Karen E Bremner; Andrea Bezjak; John Trachtenberg; Gary Naglie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Screening for prostate cancer (PC)--an update on recent findings of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  8 in total

1.  Measuring quality of life after radical prostatectomy from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Health-related quality of life following radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew G Matthew; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Tal Davidson; Kristen L Currie; Haiyan Jiang; Murray Krahn; Neil E Fleshner; Robin Kalnin; Alyssa S Louis; B Joyce Davison; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Prostate cancer mortality and metastasis under different biopsy frequencies in North American active surveillance cohorts.

Authors:  Jane M Lange; Aaron A Laviana; David F Penson; Daniel W Lin; Anna Bill-Axelson; Sigrid V Carlsson; Lisa F Newcomb; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter; Peter R Carroll; Mathew R Cooperberg; Janet E Cowan; Laurence H Klotz; Ruth B Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The effect of meeting physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors on quality of life following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Santa Mina; Crissa L Guglietti; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Andrew G Matthew; Robin Kalnin; Nora Ahmad; Uri Lindner; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Does nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy increase the risk of positive surgical margins and biochemical progression?

Authors:  Sultan Saud Alkhateeb; Shabbir M Alibhai; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner; Michael A Jewett; Alexandre R Zlotta; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2010-05

6.  African American prostate cancer survivorship: Exploring the role of social support in quality of life after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kellie R Imm; Faustine Williams; Ashley J Housten; Graham A Colditz; Bettina F Drake; Keon L Gilbert; Lin Yang
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2017-04-11

Review 7.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016.

Authors:  Anne Magnus; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Victoria Brown; Rob Carter
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-05-27

8.  Current Mental Distress Among Men With a History of Radical Prostatectomy and Related Adverse Correlates.

Authors:  Gabriela Ilie; Joshua White; Ross Mason; Ricardo Rendon; Greg Bailly; Joseph Lawen; David Bowes; Nikhilesh Patil; Derek Wilke; Cody MacDonald; Robert Rutledge; David Bell
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.