Literature DB >> 11458073

Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study.

M S Litwin1, G Y Melmed, T Nakazon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigate the longitudinal recovery of quality of life after radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the self-reported health related quality of life in 247 men undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patients were assessed at baseline before surgery and postoperatively every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for up to 48 months (median 30). We measured general and prostate specific health related quality of life with the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 SF-36 and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine whether some patients were more likely than others to have a successful return to baseline functioning after treatment.
RESULTS: In the SF-36 60% of patients reached baseline in all domains by 3 months. By 12 months, greater than 90% of patients reached baseline in all domains. Mean recovery time for these domains was about 4(1/2) months. The recovery of urinary function to baseline was 21% at 3, 56% at 12 and 63% at 30 months, respectively. About 80% of patients recovered to baseline urinary bother. In the urinary domains patients who recovered did so at an average of 7 to 8 months, and there was little additional recovery after 18 months. By 1 year postoperatively, approximately a third of patients reached baseline sexual function and about half recovered to baseline sexual bother. At 2 years postoperatively, sexual function and bother returned to baseline in 40% and 60% of patients, respectively. Mean recovery time was about 11 months for sexual function and about 9 months for sexual bother. There was little additional recovery in the sexual domains after 18 to 24 months. In the bowel domains more than two thirds of patients returned to baseline by 3 months, and greater than 90% recovered by 12 months, with a mean recovery of 4.8 months. Unmarried men were more likely than those married to regain baseline sexual function (p = 0.03) and urinary function (p = 0.07). Patients who were 65 years and older were more likely than those younger to return to baseline sexual bother (p = 0.03). There were trends that showed patients with higher incomes as well as those who were white were more likely to recover baseline scores for urinary function and the physical component summary. Another trend suggested that men with a higher education were less likely to regain urinary function (p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Most quality of life recovery occurs early after radical prostatectomy, except in several domains, including urinary and sexual, which continue to improve even beyond 2 years postoperatively. Patients should be encouraged that recovery may continue for months or years after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11458073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  35 in total

1.  Racial differences in well-being and cancer concerns in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Sumedha Chhatre; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz; Ravishankar Jayadevappa
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Cognitive behavioral stress management intervention improves quality of life in Spanish monolingual hispanic men treated for localized prostate cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Lara Traeger; Jason Dahn; Ivan Molton; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Neil Schneiderman; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Novel techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: evidence of efficacy?

Authors:  Marnie R Robinson; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature.

Authors:  A C Wootten; J M Abbott; A Farrell; D W Austin; B Klein
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Effect of minimizing tension during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary function recovery.

Authors:  Keith J Kowalczyk; Andy C Huang; Nathanael D Hevelone; Stuart R Lipsitz; Hua-yin Yu; John H Lynch; Jim C Hu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Sexual self-schema and depressive symptoms after prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Hoyt; Kristen M Carpenter
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Optimism and prostate cancer-specific expectations predict better quality of life after robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrea A Thornton; Martin A Perez; Sindy Oh; Laura Crocitto
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2012-06

8.  Health-related quality of life following radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew G Matthew; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Tal Davidson; Kristen L Currie; Haiyan Jiang; Murray Krahn; Neil E Fleshner; Robin Kalnin; Alyssa S Louis; B Joyce Davison; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  [Sexuality of couples 5 years after radical prostatectomy. Sexuality of patients and their partners 1 year postoperatively in sexually active couples].

Authors:  T B Jordan; R Ernst; G Hatzichristodoulou; A Dinkel; T Klorek; C Beyrle; J E Gschwend; K Herkommer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Changes in health utilities and health-related quality of life over 12 months following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer Ku; Murray Krahn; John Trachtenberg; Michael Nesbitt; Robin Kalnin; Gina Lockwood; Shabbir M H Alibhai
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.