BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Shorter travel times and distance to dialysis clinics have been associated with improved patient outcomes and a higher health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The objective of this study was to compare HRQOL between prevalent in-center and satellite dialysis patients, as well as compare travel-related factors that contribute to HRQOL between in-center and satellite-based patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASURES: The London Health Sciences Centre is a tertiary care center with in-center and regional satellite hemodialysis units. Patients who consented and completed a questionnaire (n = 202) were enrolled into a cross-sectional, cohort observational study. Patients were administered the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the Kidney Disease Health Related Quality of Life (KDHRQOL) tool and were asked questions relating to travel to dialysis clinics. RESULTS: Patients who underwent dialysis in the satellites had similar demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters. Patients who underwent dialysis in satellite units reported a significantly superior score on the dialysis stress domain of the KDHRQOL questionnaire. There was no significant difference between in-center and satellite patients on the basis of the SF-36. Satellite patients also reported a significantly decreased cost of transportation, a significantly increased proportion who drive themselves to clinics, and significantly decreased travel time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent dialysis in satellite units demonstrated similar characteristics, comorbidities, surrogate outcomes, and most aspects of HRQOL. Travel time, cost, and receiving treatment in one's own community are important factors that may contribute to a trend toward higher reported HRQOL by patients in satellite dialysis units.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Shorter travel times and distance to dialysis clinics have been associated with improved patient outcomes and a higher health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The objective of this study was to compare HRQOL between prevalent in-center and satellite dialysis patients, as well as compare travel-related factors that contribute to HRQOL between in-center and satellite-based patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASURES: The London Health Sciences Centre is a tertiary care center with in-center and regional satellite hemodialysis units. Patients who consented and completed a questionnaire (n = 202) were enrolled into a cross-sectional, cohort observational study. Patients were administered the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the Kidney Disease Health Related Quality of Life (KDHRQOL) tool and were asked questions relating to travel to dialysis clinics. RESULTS:Patients who underwent dialysis in the satellites had similar demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters. Patients who underwent dialysis in satellite units reported a significantly superior score on the dialysis stress domain of the KDHRQOL questionnaire. There was no significant difference between in-center and satellite patients on the basis of the SF-36. Satellite patients also reported a significantly decreased cost of transportation, a significantly increased proportion who drive themselves to clinics, and significantly decreased travel time. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who underwent dialysis in satellite units demonstrated similar characteristics, comorbidities, surrogate outcomes, and most aspects of HRQOL. Travel time, cost, and receiving treatment in one's own community are important factors that may contribute to a trend toward higher reported HRQOL by patients in satellite dialysis units.
Authors: C Meers; M A Singer; E B Toffelmire; W Hopman; M McMurray; A R Morton; T A MacKenzie Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Garabed Eknoyan; Gerald J Beck; Alfred K Cheung; John T Daugirdas; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Michael Allon; James Bailey; James A Delmez; Thomas A Depner; Johanna T Dwyer; Andrew S Levey; Nathan W Levin; Edgar Milford; Daniel B Ornt; Michael V Rocco; Gerald Schulman; Steve J Schwab; Brendan P Teehan; Robert Toto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert M Lindsay; Janet Hux; David Holland; Steven Nadler; Robert Richardson; Charmaine Lok; Louise Moist; David Churchill Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Shunichi Fukuhara; Antonio Alberto Lopes; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Donna L Mapes; Tadao Akizawa; Jürgen Bommer; Bernard J Canaud; Friedrich K Port; Philip J Held Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: R W Evans; D L Manninen; L P Garrison; L G Hart; C R Blagg; R A Gutman; A R Hull; E G Lowrie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1985-02-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D M Connaughton; A Jamal; J McWilliams; P O'Kelly; J Ormond; A Butler; N McEntee; E Tierney; G Lambe; M Denton; C Magee; P J Conlon Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2012-06-03 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Virginia Wang; Matthew L Maciejewski; Cynthia J Coffman; Linda L Sanders; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Richard Hirth; Joseph Messana Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Albert H A Mazairac; Muriel P C Grooteman; Peter J Blankestijn; E Lars Penne; E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Claire H den Hoedt; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Erik Buskens; Menso J Nubé; Piet M ter Wee; G Ardine de Wit; Michiel L Bots Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Aminu K Bello; Ikechi G Okpechi; Mohamed A Osman; Yeoungjee Cho; Htay Htay; Vivekanand Jha; Marina Wainstein; David W Johnson Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 42.439
Authors: Thomas W Ferguson; James Zacharias; Simon R Walker; David Collister; Claudio Rigatto; Navdeep Tangri; Paul Komenda Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.240