Literature DB >> 20018432

Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions: preliminary findings.

Seung Hyun Cho1, Jae Young Lee, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the potential usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography to evaluate focal solid hepatic lesions. In total, 51 patients with 60 focal hepatic lesions, which included 17 hemangiomas, 25 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 15 metastases and three cholangiocarcinomas, underwent ARFI elastography. The lesions were classified into three groups: Group I consisted of metastatic liver tumors and cholangiocarcinomas, group II consisted of HCCs and group III consisted of hemangiomas. The stiffness and conspicuity of the tumors as depicted on ARFI elastography and the echogenicity and conspicuity of the tumors on corresponding B-mode images were analyzed. Shear wave velocity was obtained to quantify stiffness for 36 focal hepatic lesions: 11 hemangiomas, 17 HCCs and eight other malignant lesions. On ARFI elastography images, group I tumors (n=18) appeared stiffer than the background liver for 13 lesions (72%), softer for two lesions and had identical stiffness in three lesions compared with the background liver. For group II tumors (n=25), 13 lesions (52%) appeared stiffer than the liver, six lesions appeared softer than the liver and the remaining six lesions showed the same stiffness as the liver. For group III tumors (n=17), six lesions (35%) appeared stiffer than the liver, seven lesions appeared softer and the remaining four lesions showed the same stiffness as the liver. There were no statistical differences among the three groups in terms of tumor stiffness as seen on ARFI elastography images (p>0.05). Of the 60 lesions, 41 (68%) displayed a clearer or equivalent margin on the ARFI elastography compared with that seen on B-mode images. The shear wave velocities were: Group I, 2.18+/-0.96 m/s (mean value+/-SD); group II, 2.45+/-0.81m/s; group III, 1.51+/-0.71 m/s (p=0.012). With a cut-off value of 2m/s for the shear wave velocity, the positive predictive value and specificity for malignancy were 89% and 81%, respectively. Images obtained with ARFI elastography provided additional qualitative information regarding the stiffness and tumor margin of liver tumors. By measuring shear wave velocity, quantification of stiffness was made possible and showed the potential to differentiate malignant hepatic tumors from hepatic hemangiomas. 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018432     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  39 in total

1.  Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of the liver: can fat deposition in the liver affect the measurement of liver stiffness?

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Yoshibumi Niitsuma; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

4.  Clinical utility of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for identification of malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Ying; Xiao Lin; Zuo-Liu Xie; Fei-Yun Tang; Yuan-Ping Hu; Ke-Qing Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Shear modulus imaging by direct visualization of propagating shear waves with phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Shaozhen Song; Zhihong Huang; Thu-Mai Nguyen; Emily Y Wong; Bastien Arnal; Matthew O'Donnell; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 6.  Liver elastography, comments on EFSUMB elastography guidelines 2013.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Chiara De Molo; Andre Ignee; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 2, Diagnostic Performance, Confounders, and Future Directions.

Authors:  An Tang; Guy Cloutier; Nikolaus M Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Functional imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tim Ch Hoogenboom; Mark Thursz; Eric O Aboagye; Rohini Sharma
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29

9.  Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Jingfei Liu; Brett Z Fite; Josquin Foiret; Asaf Ilovitsh; J Kent Leach; Erik Dumont; Charles F Caskey; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Acoustic radiation force elasticity imaging in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  Joshua R Doherty; Gregg E Trahey; Kathryn R Nightingale; Mark L Palmeri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.