Literature DB >> 2001782

Goal-oriented medical care.

J W Mold1, G H Blake, L A Becker.   

Abstract

The problem-oriented model upon which much of modern medical care is based has resulted in tremendous advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of many illnesses. Unfortunately, it is less well suited to the management of a number of modern health care problems, including chronic incurable illnesses, health promotion and disease prevention, and normal life events such as pregnancy, well-child care, and death and dying. It is not particularly conducive to an interdisciplinary team approach and tends to shift control of health away from the patient and toward the physician. Since when using this approach the enemies are disease and death, defeat is inevitable. Proposed here is a goal-oriented approach that is well suited to a greater variety of health care issues, is more compatible with a team approach, and places a greater emphasis on physician-patient collaboration. Each individual is encouraged to achieve the highest possible level of health as defined by that individual. Characterized by a greater emphasis on individual strengths and resources, this approach represents a more positive approach to health care. The enemy, not disease or death but inhumanity, can almost always be averted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2001782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  38 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of dementia in primary care at an early stage: the need for a new concept and an adapted procedure.

Authors:  J De Lepeleire; J Heyrman
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-06

2.  James Mackenzie Lecture 2011: multimorbidity, goal-oriented care, and equity.

Authors:  Jan De Maeseneer; Pauline Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes as a Measure of Healthcare Quality.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Why research in family medicine? A superfluous question.

Authors:  Jan M De Maeseneer; An De Sutter
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Ways of knowing, learning, and developing.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Novel computerized health risk appraisal may improve longitudinal health and wellness in primary care: a pilot study.

Authors:  Z J Nagykaldi; V Voncken-Brewster; C B Aspy; J W Mold
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Power to advocate for health.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Electronic health record functionality needed to better support primary care.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; John W Beasley; Jesse C Crosson; David C Kibbe; Michael S Klinkman; Christoph U Lehmann; Chester H Fox; Jason M Mitchell; James W Mold; Wilson D Pace; Kevin A Peterson; Robert L Phillips; Robert Post; Jon Puro; Michael Raddock; Ray Simkus; Steven E Waldren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Carlos R Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Susan A Flocke; James M Gill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Encouraging Patient-Centered Care by Including Quality-of-Life Questions on Pre-Encounter Forms.

Authors:  Becky A Purkaple; James W Mold; Sixia Chen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.