| Literature DB >> 20016811 |
M León1, P M Yaryura, M S Montecchia, A I Hernández, O S Correa, N L Pucheu, N L Kerber, A F García.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to isolate and select indigenous soil Pseudomonas and Bacillus bacteria capable of developing multiple mechanisms of action related to the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi affecting soybean crops. The screening procedure consisted of antagonism tests against a panel of phytopathogenic fungi, taxonomic identification, detection by PCR of several genes related to antifungal activity, in vitro detection of the antifungal products, and root colonization assays. Two isolates, identified and designated as Pseudomonas fluorescens BNM296 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BNM340, were selected for further studies. These isolates protected plants against the damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum and were able to increase the seedling emergence rate after inoculation of soybean seeds with each bacterium. Also, the shoot nitrogen content was higher in plants when seeds were inoculated with BNM296. The polyphasic approach of this work allowed us to select two indigenous bacterial strains that promoted the early development of soybean plants.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20016811 PMCID: PMC2789335 DOI: 10.1155/2009/572049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Bacterial species source and origin.
| Strain | Source |
|---|---|
|
| ATCC§ |
|
| Sunflower capitulum [ |
|
| DSMZ† |
|
| DSMZ |
|
| DSMZ |
|
| DSMZ |
|
| DSMZ |
|
| DSMZ |
|
| NRRL‡ |
|
| ATCC |
|
| ATCC |
|
| DSMZ |
|
| ATCC |
|
| This study, agricultural soil |
|
| This study, agricultural soil |
|
| This study, agricultural soil |
|
| This study, agricultural soil |
|
| This study, agricultural soil |
|
| This study, agricultural soil |
*Banco Nacional de Microorganismos, INBA-CONICET, Argentina, †German Resource Centre of Biological Material, Germany; ‡Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection, USA; §American Type Culture Collection, USA.
Antagonism of isolates against different pathogenic fungi.
| BNM | BNM | BNM | BNM | BNM | BNM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 340 | 343 | 297 | 296 | 299 | 345 | ||
| Ascomycota |
| +++ | +++ | +++ | − | − | +++ |
|
| ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
|
| |||||||
| Mitosporic Fungi |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | − | + | ++ | |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | + | − | ++ | |
|
| ++ | ++++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | |
|
| |||||||
| Oomycota |
| +++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Relative growth in the presence or absence of bacteria as follows: same as control, (−); 99% to 61%, (+); 60% to 31%, (++); 30% to 1%, (+++); total inhibition, (++++). Experiments were repeated three times for each bacterial fungal combination on PDA medium. Bacterial strains used: B. amyloliquefaciens BNM340, B. cereus BNM343, P. fluorescens BNM296 and BNM297, and B. cepacia BNM299 and BNM345. Siderophore producers (BNM296, 297, 299, and 345) were also tested in KB medium and were found to be effective antagonists in comparison with the results in PDA. The fungal strains tested also belonged to the Banco Nacional de Microorganismos, INBA-CONICET, Argentina (BNM).
Main characteristics of the selected strains.
| Characteristic | BNM340 | BNM343 | BNM297 | BNM296 | BNM299 | BNM345 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siderophores* | nd | nd | + | + | + | + |
| Chitinolytic† | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 9.0 ± 1.4 | 6.8 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 4.0 ± 0.0 |
| Cellulolytic‡ | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.5 |
| Proteolytic§ | 31.0 ± 1.4 | 31.5 ± 2.1 | 31.5 ± 2.1 | 35.0 ± 5.7 | 29.5 ± 2.1 | 35.5 ± 0.7 |
| Volatile comp.** | nd | nd | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 1 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| Antibiotics†† | nd | nd | − | + | + | + |
| Biosurfactant‡‡ | + | ++ | +/− | +/− | + | − |
| Auxins§§ | 8.4 ± 4.1 | 11.3 ± 6.0 | 4.12 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
| P solubilization*** | − | − | − | + | + | +/− |
Results of the first screening tests for characterization of B. amyloliquefaciens BNM340, B. cereus BNM343, Pseudomonas sp. BNM296, and BNM297, B. cepacia BNM299 and BNM345.*+, Siderophore detected after 72 h at 30°C, + orange halos between 1–5 mm.†Mean halo diameter (mm) and SE of chitin consumption on agar-chitin plates. ‡Mean halo diameter (mm) and SE of cellulose consumption on microcrystalline cellulose plates. §Mean halo diameter (mm) and SE of casein consumption on skim milk plates. **Relative growth of Fusarium solani in the presence of isolates but with no physical contact with them. †† PCR analysis of different compounds related to antibiosis. ‡‡hemolytic halo, +/− halo radius between 0–1 mm, + halos between 1–5 mm, ++ halos >5mm on blood-agar plates. §§Mean and SD amount of IAA (μg/mL) in the spent culture medium after eight days of incubation of the three independent experiments performed. ***Solubilization of CaHPO4, +: solubilization halo ≥10 mm, +/− : halo <10 mm, − : no solubilization halo, nd: not determined.
Seed and root colonization of isolates selected to perform microcosm assays.
| Seed colonization | Root colonization | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (log CFU/seed) | Loosely attached | Strongly attached | |
| (log CFU/mg dwr) | (log CFU/mg dwr) | ||
| BNM296 | 6.65 ± 0.09a | 6.85 ± 0.33a | 6.9 ± 0.66a |
| BNM297 | 6.63 ± 0.17a | 6.73 ± 0.14a | 6.65 ± 0.16a |
| BNM340 | 5.73 ± 0.66b | 5.18 ± 1.20b | 4.74 ± 0.33b |
Mean ± SE values of three independent experiments. Means within columns followed by the same letters do not differ significantly, (P < 0.05) according to Tukey's multiple comparison test using the Infostat software.
Inoculation of soybean seeds with the potential biocontrol agents, response of plant growth in soil infested with Pythium ultimum.
| Treatment | % Disease suppression* | Emergence rate (%)† | Shoot dry wt. (g/plant)‡ | % Nitrogen/plant§ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 85.6 ± 19.4cd | 93 ± 01b | 2.31 ± 0.30a | 1.72 ± 0.17a |
| BNM296 | 95.88 ± 10.1d | 97 ± 03b | 2.72 ± 0.43b | 2.62 ± 0.19b |
| BNM297 | 86.6 ± 12.6cd | 90 ± 01b | 2.39 ± 0.28ab | 1.70 ± 0.25a |
| BNM340 | 86.6 ± 12.6cd | 93 ± 01b | 2.38 ± 0.32ab | 1.74 ± 0.16a |
| P | 0.20 ± 16.7a | 31 ± 11a | 1.53 ± 0.19c | 1.66 ± 0.20a |
| P+BNM296 | 53.7 ± 26.4b | 90 ± 04b | 2.28 ± 0.42ab | 2.49 ± 0.21b |
| P+BNM297 | 1.20 ± 21.4a | 33 ± 16a | 0.60 ± 0.73d | 1.68 ± 0.13a |
| P+BNM340 | 74.07 ± 22.0c | 89 ± 06b | 2.54 ± 0.22ab | 1.85 ± 0.13a |
*Percent disease suppression was calculated using [(A − B)/A] × 100, where A = root rot severity index exhibited by the control treatment inoculated with the pathogen alone and B = root rot severity index exhibited by plants treated with both the pathogen and the bacterial antagonists. Control = non-inoculated seeds in non-infested substrate; P = substrate infested with P. ultimum; BNM296, BNM297, and BNM340; seeds inoculated with P. fluorescens BNM296, P. fluorescens BNM297 or B. amyloliquefaciens BNM340 in non-infested substrate; and P+BNM296, P+BNM297 and P+BNM340, seeds inoculated with BNM296, BNM297, or BNM340 in substrate infested with P. ultimum. Means within columns followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (P < 0.10, MSD = 17.9). †Means ± SE (P < 0 .05, MSD = 0.2). ‡Means ± SE (P < 0 .05, MSD = 0.73). §Means ± SE (P < 0 .1, MSD = 0.44) all according to the LSD test using the Infostat software.