Literature DB >> 20014575

Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation.

Hall Sawyer1, Matthew J Kauffman, Ryan M Nielson, Jon S Horne.   

Abstract

As habitat loss and fragmentation increase across ungulate ranges, identifying and prioritizing migration routes for conservation has taken on new urgency. Here we present a general framework using the Brownian bridge movement model (BBMM) that: (1) provides a probabilistic estimate of the migration routes of a sampled population, (2) distinguishes between route segments that function as stopover sites vs. those used primarily as movement corridors, and (3) prioritizes routes for conservation based upon the proportion of the sampled population that uses them. We applied this approach to a migratory mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) population in a pristine area of southwest Wyoming, USA, where 2000 gas wells and 1609 km of pipelines and roads have been proposed for development. Our analysis clearly delineated where migration routes occurred relative to proposed development and provided guidance for on-the-ground conservation efforts. Mule deer migration routes were characterized by a series of stopover sites where deer spent most of their time, connected by movement corridors through which deer moved quickly. Our findings suggest management strategies that differentiate between stopover sites and movement corridors may be warranted. Because some migration routes were used by more mule deer than others, proportional level of use may provide a reasonable metric by which routes can be prioritized for conservation. The methods we outline should be applicable to a wide range of species that inhabit regions where migration routes are threatened or poorly understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20014575     DOI: 10.1890/08-2034.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  38 in total

1.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement.

Authors:  N Owen-Smith; J M Fryxell; E H Merrill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics.

Authors:  Juan M Morales; Paul R Moorcroft; Jason Matthiopoulos; Jacqueline L Frair; John G Kie; Roger A Powell; Evelyn H Merrill; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Assessing Potential Conservation and Restoration Areas of Freshwater Fish Fauna in the Indian River Basins.

Authors:  Jay P Bhatt; Kumar Manish; Rajender Mehta; Maharaj K Pandit
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Ecological carryover effects complicate conservation.

Authors:  Constance M O'Connor; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Motorized Activity on Legacy Seismic Lines: A Predictive Modeling Approach to Prioritize Restoration Efforts.

Authors:  M L Hornseth; K E Pigeon; D MacNearney; T A Larsen; G Stenhouse; J Cranston; L Finnegan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Robustness of movement models: can models bridge the gap between temporal scales of data sets and behavioural processes?

Authors:  Ulrike E Schlägel; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Population trends in Vermivora warblers are linked to strong migratory connectivity.

Authors:  Gunnar R Kramer; David E Andersen; David A Buehler; Petra B Wood; Sean M Peterson; Justin A Lehman; Kyle R Aldinger; Lesley P Bulluck; Sergio Harding; John A Jones; John P Loegering; Curtis Smalling; Rachel Vallender; Henry M Streby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Testing the potential of streamflow data to predict spring migration of ungulate herds.

Authors:  Jason S Alexander; Marissa L Murr; Cheryl A Eddy-Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparing habitat suitability and connectivity modeling methods for conserving pronghorn migrations.

Authors:  Erin E Poor; Colby Loucks; Andrew Jakes; Dean L Urban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Migrating mule deer: effects of anthropogenically altered landscapes.

Authors:  Patrick E Lendrum; Charles R Anderson; Kevin L Monteith; Jonathan A Jenks; R Terry Bowyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.