Literature DB >> 20014353

Sample size requirement to detect an intervention effect at the end of follow-up in a longitudinal cluster randomized trial.

Moonseong Heo1, Yongman Kim, Xiaonan Xue, Mimi Y Kim.   

Abstract

It is often anticipated in a longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trial (cluster-RCT) that the course of outcome over time will diverge between intervention arms. In these situations, testing the significance of a local intervention effect at the end of the trial may be more clinically relevant than evaluating overall mean differences between treatment groups. In this paper, we present a closed-form power function for detecting this local intervention effect based on maximum likelihood estimates from a mixed-effects linear regression model for three-level continuous data. Sample size requirements for the number of units at each data level are derived from the power function. The power function and the corresponding sample size requirements are verified by a simulation study. Importantly, it is shown that sample size requirements computed with the proposed power function are smaller than that required when testing group mean difference using data only at the end of trial and ignoring the course of outcome over the entire study period. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20014353     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Domestic Violence Enhanced Perinatal Home Visits: The DOVE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Phyllis W Sharps; Linda F Bullock; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Jeanne L Alhusen; Sharon R Ghazarian; Shreya S Bhandari; Donna L Schminkey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  The relation between mindfulness and fear of negative evaluation over the course of cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Mark Burton; Stefan K Schmertz; Matthew Price; Akihiko Masuda; Page L Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-11-01

4.  Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Clare Rutterford; Andrew Copas; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Potential biases in the classification, analysis and interpretations in cross-sectional study: commentaries - surrounding the article "resting heart rate: its correlations and potential for screening metabolic dysfunctions in adolescents".

Authors:  Augusto César Ferreira de Moraes; Alex Jones Flores Cassenote; Luis A Moreno; Heráclito Barbosa Carvalho
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Seroprevalence and modifiable risk factors for Toxocara spp. in Brazilian schoolchildren.

Authors:  Alex J F Cassenote; Alba R de Abreu Lima; José M Pinto Neto; Guita Rubinsky-Elefant
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-05-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.