Literature DB >> 20014058

Enrichment and analysis of phosphopeptides under different experimental conditions using titanium dioxide affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Uma K Aryal1, Andrew R S Ross.   

Abstract

Titanium dioxide metal oxide affinity chromatography (TiO(2)-MOAC) is widely regarded as being more selective than immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) for phosphopeptide enrichment. However, the widespread application of TiO(2)-MOAC to biological samples is hampered by conflicting reports as to which experimental conditions are optimal. We have evaluated the performance of TiO(2)-MOAC under a wide range of loading and elution conditions. Loading and stringent washing of peptides with strongly acidic solutions ensured highly selective enrichment for phosphopeptides, with minimal carryover of non-phosphorylated peptides. Contrary to previous reports, the addition of glycolic acid to the loading solution was found to reduce specificity towards phosphopeptides. Base elution in ammonium hydroxide or ammonium phosphate provided optimal specificity and recovery of phosphorylated peptides. In contrast, elution with phosphoric acid gave incomplete recovery of phosphopeptides, whereas inclusion of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in the eluant introduced a bias against the recovery of multiply phosphorylated peptides. TiO(2)-MOAC was also found to be intolerant of many reagents commonly used as phosphatase inhibitors during protein purification. However, TiO(2)-MOAC showed higher specificity than immobilized gallium (Ga(3+)), immobilized iron (Fe(3+)), or zirconium dioxide (ZrO(2)) affinity chromatography for phosphopeptide enrichment. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) was more effective in detecting larger, multiply phosphorylated peptides than liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS), which was more efficient for smaller, singly phosphorylated peptides. Copyright 2009 Crown in the right of Canada

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20014058     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  13 in total

1.  Preparation of Highly Porous Coordination Polymer Coatings on Macroporous Polymer Monoliths for Enhanced Enrichment of Phosphopeptides.

Authors:  Alexandros Lamprou; Hongxia Wang; Adeela Saeed; Frantisek Svec; David Britt; Fernando Maya
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Identification of phosphoproteins associated with human neutrophil granules following chemotactic peptide stimulation.

Authors:  Gregory C Luerman; David W Powell; Silvia M Uriarte; Timothy D Cummins; Michael L Merchant; Richard A Ward; Kenneth R McLeish
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of histone modifications.

Authors:  He Huang; Shu Lin; Benjamin A Garcia; Yingming Zhao
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Scalable, Non-denaturing Purification of Phosphoproteins Using Ga3+-IMAC: N2A and M1M2 Titin Components as Study case.

Authors:  Michael Adams; Jennifer R Fleming; Eva Riehle; Tiankun Zhou; Thomas Zacharchenko; Marija Markovic; Olga Mayans
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 5.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics: existing capabilities and future directions.

Authors:  Thomas E Angel; Uma K Aryal; Shawna M Hengel; Erin S Baker; Ryan T Kelly; Errol W Robinson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 54.564

6.  Comparison of metal and metal oxide media for phosphopeptide enrichment prior to mass spectrometric analyses.

Authors:  Matthew B Gates; Kenneth B Tomer; Leesa J Deterding
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Evaluation of quantitative performance of sequential immobilized metal affinity chromatographic enrichment for phosphopeptides.

Authors:  Zeyu Sun; Karyn L Hamilton; Kenneth F Reardon
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 8.  Analytical challenges translating mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics from discovery to clinical applications.

Authors:  Anton B Iliuk; Justine V Arrington; Weiguo Andy Tao
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 9.  Enrichment techniques employed in phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Jan Fíla; David Honys
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.520

10.  PTRF/cavin-1 and MIF proteins are identified as non-small cell lung cancer biomarkers by label-free proteomics.

Authors:  Angelo Gámez-Pozo; Iker Sánchez-Navarro; Enrique Calvo; María Teresa Agulló-Ortuño; Rocío López-Vacas; Esther Díaz; Emilio Camafeita; Manuel Nistal; Rosario Madero; Enrique Espinosa; Juan Antonio López; Juan Ángel Fresno Vara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.