OBJECTIVES: Patients with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) show special clinical behavior compared to patients with other histologic subtypes of RCC. This study aimed to assess the relevance of surgical and systemic options used in treatment of these patients prior to the recent era of targeted therapies. METHODS: Retrospectively, we assessed clinical data of 61 patients with metastatic papillary RCC who were treated at eight centers in Germany. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 20 (range 1-114) months and median age at time of diagnosis was 62 (range 24-85) years. Men were affected predominantly (50/61; 82%). Twenty-one patients (34%) showed metastases at time of diagnosis. In the remaining 40 patients, median time to development of metastases was 30.4 (range 3-143; mean 16.5) months. Sites of metastases were lung (37; 61%), bone (24; 38%), liver (20; 33%), lymph nodes (24; 38%), and local recurrence (17; 28%). Others sites of disease were brain metastases (6 patients/10%), peritoneal carcinosis (5 patients/8%), and others. A surgical approach with potentially curative intention was performed primarily in 11 patients (18%). 31 patients received an immuno- (interferon-alpha +/- interleukin-2) or immunochemotherapy as first line treatment for metastatic disease. Overall, 42/61 patients (69%) received systemic therapy. Supportive care only was performed in 12 patients (20%) because of poor performance status. Median overall survival after diagnosis of metastatic disease was longer than 48 months in patients with tumor resection (n = 11) compared to 13.0 +/- 4.3 months 95% CI 4.5-21.5 (n = 42) months in patients without surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Complete resection of metastases represents a valid option in management of patients with relapsing or metastatic papillary RCC.
OBJECTIVES:Patients with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) show special clinical behavior compared to patients with other histologic subtypes of RCC. This study aimed to assess the relevance of surgical and systemic options used in treatment of these patients prior to the recent era of targeted therapies. METHODS: Retrospectively, we assessed clinical data of 61 patients with metastatic papillary RCC who were treated at eight centers in Germany. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 20 (range 1-114) months and median age at time of diagnosis was 62 (range 24-85) years. Men were affected predominantly (50/61; 82%). Twenty-one patients (34%) showed metastases at time of diagnosis. In the remaining 40 patients, median time to development of metastases was 30.4 (range 3-143; mean 16.5) months. Sites of metastases were lung (37; 61%), bone (24; 38%), liver (20; 33%), lymph nodes (24; 38%), and local recurrence (17; 28%). Others sites of disease were brain metastases (6 patients/10%), peritoneal carcinosis (5 patients/8%), and others. A surgical approach with potentially curative intention was performed primarily in 11 patients (18%). 31 patients received an immuno- (interferon-alpha +/- interleukin-2) or immunochemotherapy as first line treatment for metastatic disease. Overall, 42/61 patients (69%) received systemic therapy. Supportive care only was performed in 12 patients (20%) because of poor performance status. Median overall survival after diagnosis of metastatic disease was longer than 48 months in patients with tumor resection (n = 11) compared to 13.0 +/- 4.3 months 95% CI 4.5-21.5 (n = 42) months in patients without surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Complete resection of metastases represents a valid option in management of patients with relapsing or metastatic papillary RCC.
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vincenzo Ficarra; Luigi Schips; François Guillè; Guorong Li; Alexandre De La Taille; Tommaso Prayer Galetti; Luca Cindolo; Giacomo Novara; Richard E Zigeuner; Emiliano Bratti; Jacques Tostain; Vincenzo Altieri; Claude C Abbou; Walter Artibani; Jean-Jacques Patard Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Börje Ljungberg; Damian C Hanbury; Marcus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Peter F A Mulders; Jean-Jacques Patard; Ioanel C Sinescu Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Stephen D W Beck; Manish I Patel; Mark E Snyder; Michael W Kattan; Robert J Motzer; Victor E Reuter; Paul Russo Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Michael A Gieseg; Theresa Cody; Michael Z Man; Steven J Madore; Mark A Rubin; Eric P Kaldjian Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2002-09-30 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Nathan M Mollberg; Nicholas B Johnson; Shan-Chinga Ying; Khaled Abdelhady; Malek G Massad; Doreen E Chung Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.862