Literature DB >> 16007683

Multiinstitutional European validation of the 2002 TNM staging system in conventional and papillary localized renal cell carcinoma.

Vincenzo Ficarra1, Luigi Schips, François Guillè, Guorong Li, Alexandre De La Taille, Tommaso Prayer Galetti, Luca Cindolo, Giacomo Novara, Richard E Zigeuner, Emiliano Bratti, Jacques Tostain, Vincenzo Altieri, Claude C Abbou, Walter Artibani, Jean-Jacques Patard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study validated the 2002 edition of the TNM staging system in a multicenter, multinational European series of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
METHODS: The authors analyzed the clinical data of 2217 patients who had undergone radical or partial nephrectomy for localized RCC in 7 urologic centers.
RESULTS: In the current study, 1065 patients (48%) were classified as having pT1a disease, 771 (34.8%) were classified as having pT1b disease, and 381 (17.2%) were classified as having pT2 disease. Tumor histotype was conventional RCC in 1886 patients (85%), papillary in 182 (8.2%) patients, chromophobe in 64 (2.9%) patients, and unclassified in 85 (3.8%) patients. The mean follow-up time was 65.36 +/- 52.09 months. The 5 and 10-year disease-specific survival probabilities were 95.3% and 91.4% in patients with pT1a disease, 91.4% and 83.4% in patients with pT1b disease, and 81.6% and 75.2% in patients with pT2 disease (log-rank test P value = 0.0000). The disease-specific survival rates of patients with pT1a RCC were significantly higher than those recorded in patients with pT1b and pT2 RCC. Similarly, the disease-specific survival probabilities of patients with pT1b RCC were significantly better than those of patients with pT2 RCC. Analyzing the seven series individually, the 2002 TNM staging system provided appropriate stratification for only one series. The 2002 TNM staging system allowed significant stratification of the cancer-related outcomes in the subgroup of patients with conventional RCC but not in those with papillary carcinomas.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of the 2002 TNM staging system in the current multicenter series enabled the authors to demonstrate optimal stratification of patients with localized RCC. Stratifying by tumor histotype, the data coming from the whole group analysis were reconfirmed for clear cell RCC only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16007683     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

1.  Predicting aggressive behavior in small renal tumors prior to treatment.

Authors:  Daniel D Shapiro; E Jason Abel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

2.  Unclassified renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological, comparative genomic hybridization, and whole-genome exon sequencing study.

Authors:  Zhen-Yan Hu; Li-Juan Pang; Yan Qi; Xue-Ling Kang; Jian-Ming Hu; Lianghai Wang; Kun-Peng Liu; Yuan Ren; Mei Cui; Li-Li Song; Hong-An Li; Hong Zou; Feng Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Jean Jacques Patard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  VHL and HIF-1α: gene variations and prognosis in early-stage clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Francesca Lessi; Chiara Maria Mazzanti; Sara Tomei; Claudio Di Cristofano; Andrea Minervini; Michele Menicagli; Alessandro Apollo; Lorenzo Masieri; Paola Collecchi; Riccardo Minervini; Marco Carini; Generoso Bevilacqua
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Validation of the 2009 TNM Classification for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison with the 2002 TNM Classification by Concordance Index.

Authors:  Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Junsoo Park; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-08-22

Review 6.  Renal cell carcinoma: where will the state-of-the-art lead us?

Authors:  A Rose Brannon; W Kimryn Rathmell
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  The role of surgery in clinical management of patients with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Steiner; Hartmut Kirchner; Michael Siebels; Christian Doehn; Hans Heynemann; Zoltan Varga; Detlef Rohde; Joerg Schubert; Dieter Jocham; Christian Stief; Paolo Fornara; Rainer Hofmann; Stefan Loening; Jan Roigas
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  [Imaging renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  A Graser; C J Zech; C G Stief; M F Reiser; M Staehler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Overexpression of IL-32 is a novel prognostic factor in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Lee; Zhe Long Liang; Song Mei Huang; Jae-Sung Lim; DO-Young Yoon; Hyo-Jin Lee; Jin Man Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Risk stratification and prognostication of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Antonio Galfano; Giacomo Novara; Massimo Iafrate; Matteo Brunelli; Silvia Secco; Stefano Cavalleri; Guido Martignoni; Walter Artibani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.