Literature DB >> 20012195

Comparison of artificial insemination with natural mating on smallholder farms in Thailand, and the effects of boar stimulation and distance of semen delivery on sow reproductive performance.

Nutthee Am-in1, Wichai Tantasuparuk, Mongkol Techakumphu.   

Abstract

Following the implementation of artificial insemination (AI) services for smallholder pig farms, we investigated the reproductive performance after AI and its influencing factors. A small-scale boar station with an AI lab was established with two active boars having good genetics and free from reproductive diseases. Individual sow cards were used for reproductive data recording. A total of 171 sows on 92 farms situated within a radius of 50 km from the AI center were included in this study. Sows bred by AI (n = 121) were inseminated twice per estrus by two trained inseminators. A further 50 sows were mated by natural services using local rental boars. The impact of boar stimulation and distance from the AI center to the farm were also determined. Non-return (P = 0.02) and farrowing rates (P = 0.03) were higher for AI than for naturally bred sows (84.0% and 76.0% vs. 74.0% and 70.0% for AI and naturally bred, respectively). For sows bred by AI, boar stimulation increased non-return rate (84.1% vs. 70.0%; P = 0.09), farrowing rate (83.7% vs. 69.2%; P = 0.01) and litter size (11.2 +/- 2.3 vs. 9.7 +/- 1.7; P < 0.01). There was no effect on performance due to distance of semen transport. These results clearly indicate that sow performance on smallholder farms will improve if AI is utilized and boar stimulation is employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20012195     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-009-9508-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  13 in total

1.  Effect of boar contact on follicular development and on estrus expression after weaning in primiparous sows.

Authors:  P Langendijk; H van den Brand; N M Soede; B Kemp
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Variability in relationships between semen quality and estimates of in vivo and in vitro fertility in boars.

Authors:  J M Popwell; W L Flowers
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  The effect of managed boar contact in the post-weaning period on the subsequent fertility and fecundity of sows.

Authors:  J R Behan; P F Watson
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.145

4.  A longitudinal study of sows and boars raised by smallholder farmers in the Philippines.

Authors:  Eugene B Lañada; Jenny-Ann L M Lee; Simon J More; Basito S Cotiw-an; Alberto A Taveros
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Genetic parameters for semen traits in AI boars estimated from data on individual ejaculates.

Authors:  J Wolf
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.005

6.  Factors associated with return to estrus in first service swine females.

Authors:  Anamaria J Vargas; Mari L Bernardi; Fernando P Bortolozzo; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Ivo Wentz
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Evaluation of biological and economic efficiency of smallholder pig production systems in North Vietnam.

Authors:  U Lemke; B Kaufmann; L T Thuy; K Emrich; A Valle Zárate
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  A model for economic comparison of swine insemination programs.

Authors:  W R Lamberson; T J Safranski
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  Uterine activity, sperm transport, and the role of boar stimuli around insemination in sows.

Authors:  P Langendijk; N M Soede; B Kemp
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Molecular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease viruses from South East Asia 1998-2006: the Lao perspective.

Authors:  Syseng Khounsy; James V Conlan; Laurence J Gleeson; Harvey A Westbury; Axel Colling; David J Paton; Nigel P Ferris; Jean-François Valarcher; Jemma Wadsworth; Nick J Knowles; Stuart D Blacksell
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  2 in total

1.  The development of a model for artificial insemination by backyard pig farmers in Thailand.

Authors:  Weethima Visalvethaya; Wichai Tantasuparuk; Mongkol Techakumphu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Artificial insemination of pigs reared under smallholder production system in northeastern India: success rate, genetic improvement, and monetary benefit.

Authors:  Govindasamy Kadirvel; Arumugam Kumaresan; Anubrata Das; Kamal Malla Bujarbaruah; Venkatasamy Venkatasubramanian; Shishom Vanao Ngachan
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.559

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.