Literature DB >> 14749052

Variability in relationships between semen quality and estimates of in vivo and in vitro fertility in boars.

J M Popwell1, W L Flowers.   

Abstract

The present experiment was designed to characterize relationships between common semen quality and fertility estimates for three boars known to differ in farrowing rate, number of pigs born alive, and monospermic penetration rate. The approach chosen to accomplish this was to monitor semen quality from these boars and use their semen alternately for either artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization for 40 weeks. This strategy relied on the variability in semen quality parameters that normally occurs in an individual boar over time. When comparisons were made among boars, farrowing rates, numbers of pigs born alive, and monospermic penetration rates were significantly different, but progressive motility, normal head and tail morphology, and acrosome morphology were not. However, when comparisons were made among ejaculates within individual boars, there were significant effects of semen quality on both in vivo and in vitro fertility. For boar 3495, the proportion of spermatozoa exhibiting progressive motility and distribution of spermatozoa in a percoll gradient had a positive linear effect on number born alive and monospermic penetration rate, respectively. For boar 2901, quadratic equations best described changes in litter size as a function of progressive motility and normal acrosomes. In addition, monospermic penetration rate increased linearly as normal acrosomes and the proportion of spermatozoa recovered from a percoll gradient increased. For boar 4291, the relationship between progressive motility and number born alive and between normal acrosomes and number of pigs born alive were also quadratic. However, a significant linear relationship was present only between normal acrosomes and monospermic penetration rate. These results demonstrate that simply relying on the means of common semen quality estimates from some boars has limited value in terms of being used as a prospective indicator of their in vivo or in vitro fertility. In contrast, characterization of relationships between semen quality and fertility estimates is useful for estimating differences in the fertility of ejaculates from individual boars. However, both quantitative and qualitative differences in these relationships among boars are present and a given semen quality estimate that is a good predictor of in vivo or in vitro fertilization for one boar, may not be applicable for others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14749052     DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci        ISSN: 0378-4320            Impact factor:   2.145


  6 in total

1.  Porcine sperm zona binding ability as an indicator of fertility.

Authors:  E D Collins; W L Flowers; R D Shanks; D J Miller
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Comparison of artificial insemination with natural mating on smallholder farms in Thailand, and the effects of boar stimulation and distance of semen delivery on sow reproductive performance.

Authors:  Nutthee Am-in; Wichai Tantasuparuk; Mongkol Techakumphu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 3.  Flow cytometry for the assessment of animal sperm integrity and functionality: state of the art.

Authors:  Md Sharoare Hossain; Anders Johannisson; Margareta Wallgren; Szabolcs Nagy; Amanda Pimenta Siqueira; Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Quality of fresh and chilled-stored raccoon dog semen and its impact on artificial insemination efficiency.

Authors:  Łukasz Jarosz; Zbigniew Grądzki; Marcin Kalinowski; Ewa Laskowska
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Glutathione Peroxidase 5 Is Expressed by the Entire Pig Male Genital Tract and Once in the Seminal Plasma Contributes to Sperm Survival and In Vivo Fertility.

Authors:  Isabel Barranco; Asta Tvarijonaviciute; Cristina Perez-Patiño; Alejandro Vicente-Carrillo; Inmaculada Parrilla; Jose J Ceron; Emilio A Martinez; Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez; Jordi Roca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Pig Seminal Plasma Reveals Intra-Ejaculate Variation in Metabolites.

Authors:  Yentel Mateo-Otero; Pol Fernández-López; Sergi Gil-Caballero; Beatriz Fernandez-Fuertes; Sergi Bonet; Isabel Barranco; Marc Yeste
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-06-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.