Certain non-standard coding tables appear to be more robust to error than the standard genetic code.

Since the identification of the Standard Coding Table as a "universal" method to translate genetic information into amino acids, exceptions to this rule have been reported, and to date there are nearly 20 alternative genetic coding tables deployed by either nuclear genomes or organelles of organisms. Why are these codes still in use and why are new codon reassignments occurring? This present study aims to provide a new method to address these questions and to analyze whether these alternative codes present any advantages or disadvantages to the organisms or organelles in terms of robustness to error. We show that two of the alternative coding tables, The Ciliate, Dasycladacean and Hexamita Nuclear Code (CDH) and The Flatworm Mitochondrial Code (FMC), exhibit an advantage, while others such as The Yeast Mitochondrial Code (YMC) are at a significant disadvantage. We propose that the Standard Code is likely to have emerged as a "local minimum" and that the "coding landscape" is still being searched for a "global" minimum.