Literature DB >> 20011770

Adhesively luted, metal-free composite crowns after five years.

Franziska Lehmann1, Katrin Spiegl, Grit Eickemeyer, Peter Rammelsberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effect of location and preparation design of abutment teeth and of preparation design on the survival and complication rate of metal-free, adhesively luted composite crowns (Artglass, Heraeus Kulzer) and their clinical performance was investigated in this controlled, randomized, prospective clinical study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After randomization, 114 single crowns (68 posterior, 46 anterior) were prepared either with a 0.5 mm chamfer finishing line or with a 0.5 mm shoulder combined with occlusal reduction of at least 1.5 mm. Buildups were made with a composite material, using the corresponding dentin adhesive. Crowns were manufactured on stone dies and intraorally adhesively luted with resin cement. Follow-up examinations were conducted after 1 month and 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. Documentation included failures and complications, occlusal contacts, plaque accumulation and patients' rating of esthetics and functionality. After 5 years, data for 83 single crowns had been obtained.
RESULTS: Within an observation period of 5 years, 18 complications occurred, including 13 major failures which resulted in replacement of the crowns, and 5 minor complications which could be repaired. All loosened crowns (n = 2) were successfully re-cemented. The Cox Regression did not reveal any effect of location or preparation design on complication rate. Calculation of the Kaplan-Meier survival curve on the basis of major failures indicated a probability of survival of 96% after 3 years and 88.5% after 5 years. Four Artglass crowns had no contact in static occlusion after 5 years and plaque accumulation was significantly higher than for control teeth. esthetic and functional evaluation by patients revealed that acceptance was high.
CONCLUSION: Metal-free composite crowns may be recommended for long-term temporary use. However, the complication rate and the increased plaque accumulation restrict the indication for permanent restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20011770     DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a18144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adhes Dent        ISSN: 1461-5185            Impact factor:   2.359


  6 in total

1.  Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Andreas Ender; Albert Trottmann; Mutlu Özcan; Jens Fischer; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fracture Resistance of Anterior Crowns Reinforced by Short-Fiber Composite.

Authors:  Lippo Lassila; Anssi Haapsaari; Pekka K Vallittu; Sufyan Garoushi
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Indirect resin composites.

Authors:  Suresh Nandini
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-10

4.  Effect of Storage Time of a Ceramic Primer on Microshear Bond Strength to Zirconia.

Authors:  Amir Ghasemi; Alireza Sadr; Anahita Pourhashemi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-11

5.  In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of different esthetic restorations.

Authors:  Amal Abdelsamad Sakrana
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 6.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.