| Literature DB >> 20011070 |
Rodrigo P Soares1, Carina Margonari, Nágila C Secundino, Maria E Macêdo, Simone M da Costa, Elizabeth F Rangel, Paulo F Pimenta, Salvatore J Turco.
Abstract
The interaction between Leishmania and sand flies has been demonstrated in many Old and New World species. Besides the morphological differentiation from procyclic to infective metacyclic promastigotes, the parasite undergoes biochemical transformations in its major surface lipophosphoglycan (LPG). An upregulation of beta-glucose residues was previously shown in the LPG repeat units from procyclic to metacyclic phase in Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis, which has not been reported in any Leishmania species. LPG has been implicated as an adhesion molecule that mediates the interaction with the midgut epithelium of the sand fly in the Subgenus Leishmania. These adaptations were explored for the first time in a species from the Subgenus Viannia, L. (V.) braziliensis with its natural vectors Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) intermedia and Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani. Using two in vitro binding techniques, phosphoglycans (PGs) derived from procyclic and metacyclic parasites were able to bind to the insect midgut and inhibit L. braziliensis attachment. Interestingly, L. braziliensis procyclic parasite attachment was approximately 11-fold greater in the midgut of L. whitmani than in L. intermedia. The epidemiological relevance of L. whitmani as a vector of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL) in Brazil is discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20011070 PMCID: PMC2789580 DOI: 10.1155/2010/439174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Figure 1Opposite mechanisms in the glucose regulation in the LPGs from procyclic and metacyclic L. chagasi (syn. L. infantum) and L. braziliensis [9, 10]. The structure of the glycan core is Gal(α1,6)Gal(α1,3) Galf(α1,3)[Glc(α1-PO4)-6]-Man(α1,3)Man(α1,4)GlcN(α1,6) linked to 1-O-alkyl-2-lyso-phosphatidylinositol anchor. The repeat units are 6-Gal(β1,4)Man(α1)-PO4.
Figure 2Differential attachment of L. braziliensis (procyclic and metacyclic) to L. whitmani (Lw) and L. intermedia (Li) midguts in vitro. *P < .01; **P > .05. Data are the representation of two experiments.
Figure 3Inhibition of attachment of procyclic L. braziliensis to the midgut of L. whitmani (Lw) and L. intermedia (Li) in the presence of phosphoglycans (PGs) (10 μg/mL). Midguts were incubated with PGs from procyclic and metacyclic L. braziliensis and further incubated with procyclic promastigotes. Control midguts were incubated only with procyclic promastigotes. PG procyclic: PG derived from procyclics; PG metacyclic: PG derived from metacyclics. *P < .0001. Data are the representation of two experiments.
Figure 4Fluorescent staining of L. intermedia (a) and L. whitmani (b) midguts incubated with PGs from procyclic (PRO) and metacyclic (META) L. braziliensis, probed with CA7AE antibody (1:400) and developed with FITC (1:1000). Control midguts were incubated with primary and secondary antibodies only.